Smoking should be banned
When will the government realize that public smoking is toxic to public health? Exposure to fumes can be just as unhealthy for a non-smoker as it is for the smoker. Smoking should be banned in public because people are exposed to hazardous smoke in many places; a ban can lead to prevention and quitting of smoking and second hand smoke can cause many illnesses and diseases. People are exposed to second hand smoke in many places and it is very dangerous. Homes, cars, and work are some places where this exposure occurs. By allowing smokers to smoke we are putting others at the risk of smoking-relating problems. Furthermore, the most dangerous gas is feature in the side stream smoke. Due to this, there is no safe level of exposure to second hand smoke. People are at great chance of disease and illness by just walking past a smoker. Smoke free environments can lead to more smokers quitting and less non-smokers starting to smoke. In a survey, it was reported that 7 out of 10 smokers want to quit, and they believe that a smoke free environment can help them. When a smoker tries to quit, they may see other smoking in public and this might cause an urge to smoke. Each day more than 3800 people try their first cigarettes. Of those 3800, 1000 begin smoking on a daily basis. When kids see people smoking, they may thing that it’s “cool” and they will try smoking for the same reason. Although, smoking is not healthy, the government gets much needed money from cigarettes and banning public smoking would decrease the income. In 2011 government received $25.3 billion of tobacco taxes and the legal settlements. However, it is really worth it getting money from something that causes cancer and other illnesses? People die from second hand smoke and now the government is getting the money from the same source. Second hand smoke can cause many serious illnesses and diseases. For example, chance of lung cancer is...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document