Preview

Smoking Ban

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Smoking Ban
Rights or Wrongs? There are many controversial issues in today’s society. The smoking bans around the United States are one of the issues. Many people are for the smoking bans, because they help reduce the amount of second hand smoke. Second hand smoke along with direct smoke can cause cancer in the lungs of adults and children. Others believe it’s against the rights of a person. The government telling people what to do is going against the Constitution. The smoking ban harms the rights of American people in public places. It is the right of smokers to be able to smoke in public places. The government should not tell people whether or not they can smoke in certain areas. According to Molyneaux, “It is legal to smoke tobacco, so the government has no right to try and make people stop. State representative Ben Waide says, “I think that this piece of legislation takes government into an area where government should not be.” The evidence in this state’s that the smoking ban hurts the rights of Americans.
As many places don’t agree with the smoking bans, it should be up to the public places. Even though places are public they are owned privately by others. The bans are hurting the people that go to those public places. According to Debatepedia, “Small workplaces will often ignore the ban and are unlikely to be caught.” As the smoking bans persist they still keep hurting rights of all Americans who choose to use tobacco. The businesses around the United States are hurting because of the government wanting to ban smoking and tobacco use in them. According to Debatepedia, “If enough people want to go to non-smoking bars, then the companies will set up non-smoking bars.” Since companies haven’t set up any this means that there are few people that want them. Businesses would lose countless amounts of money due to the lack of smokers business. In the economy, the rights of all the businesses would be hurting because of the bans being put in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ban on Hiring Smokers

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe there shouldn’t be a ban on hiring smokers because if you really think about it majority of today’s society does smoke. There will be many places that would be underemployed because there won’t be enough people out there to hire because they smoke. If they want to smoke there needs to be a designated place for them to smoke and they either A need to bring a change of clothes to smoke in or B just don’t smoke while working. The change of clothes could be used because the smell of the smoke stays in the clothes and say they are taking care of a patient who has asthma, well the smoke smell on the clothes wouldn’t be good for the patients and there is nothing that covers up the smell of smoke once on your clothes or in your hair. So therefore I think there should not be a ban on hiring smokers.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is recognized for its laws regarding freedom. By allowing smoking in public places, we are taking away the freedom of health from nonsmokers. Through banning areas where smoking is permitted, we limit freedoms of the smoker, but do not eliminate the freedom entirely. The ban would be seen more as a restriction on where these freedoms can be exercised to ensure well being for all people, smokers and nonsmokers. These limitations are for the good of the American people as a whole, which makes the ban an appropriate course of action.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What about the non-smoker who always has to respectfully get up and move tables every times someone lights up, or the couple that covers their nose while walking down the street to avoid the smoke traveling in front of them, And let’s not forget the children who are easily sickened and is forced to play in the sand while someone’s father is having a quick smoke on the bench at the park. Smoking should definitely be banned on the non smoker behalf. It is worse for those that work in a bar, café or a restaurant. They have no way of escaping that dirty stale cigarette smell, and it’s not…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerianpaper

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smoking cigarettes can cause lung problems. Both first-hand and second-hand smokers are affected by cigarette smoke. Scientific findings and researches show that the chemicals in cigarettes, apart from the smoke, can lead to health problems such as lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes should be banned in public places. In public places, more people, both young and old, can be exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. My position differs from those who might say that smoking altogether should not be banned. My position is that smoking in public places should be banned. It does not include smoking in private places like homes. Smoking in public places should be banned because it poses health risks to individuals who are non-smokers and who do not want to inhale the fumes from cigarettes. The risks are double to those who already have lung ailments.…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicotine Research Paper

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In many public places people are limited to where they can smoke, they need to remove themselves from areas of common socialization. Smokers can feel judged, unaccepted or rejected by friends or family that are nonsmokers. In politics - There has been a constant battle between the government and the tobacco industry with different studies about health hazards, such as the formation of an independent council for tobacco research to look in to health claims, which was not independent and served to undermine scientific evidence demonstrating the negative health consequences. Also changing laws, such as banning all TV, radio, and billboards; and federal supported program to enforce prohibiting sales to minors. These have caused economic changes to the industry and tax income from the drop sales of…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are smoking bans against smoking in public places really that necessary to protect non-smokers from the harmful chemicals of second hand smoke? The answer from a smoker is: Yes! However, another question that should be asked is: Do smoking bans infringe upon the rights of your freedom to smoke if you choose to smoke in places other than your personal residence or automobile? The answer from a smoker is: Yes! Therefore, the real question that must be asked is: Are smoking bans becoming too restrictive? Comment by SVSU: Quite a few questions here. Why not simply state these things?…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following viewpoint, Stephen Kaufman, who is a staff writer for the Washington File, published by the U.S. Department of State, states that the American public has changed its attitude regarding to smoking (Kaufman 1). Kaufman supports his statement that public attitudes are changing in a meeting with John F. Banzhaf, an lawyer who teaches public interest law at George Washington Law School in Washington, D.C. (Kaufman 1). Smoking bans are generally seen as an effort to protect the health of nonsmokers (Kaufman 1). Eleven states have banned smoking in indoor public places such as malls, restaurants and bars (Kaufman 1).…

    • 3940 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Welfare and Cigarettes

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cigarettes business is one of the most profitable industries in the world. The government receive huge amount of taxes from cigarettes companies and it actually uses the money to help fund the welfare program, in which a lot of people can benefit from. Making production and sale of cigarettes illegal will definitely hurt the income of the government, and add pressures on many people who are in need of welfare programs.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When something starts to validate an individuals health rights, issues will be brought up. Smoking is something that America has discovered more and more about over the years and has found increasing numbers of facts about diseases and problems associated with it and the pollution it emits. Anyone who passes by a smoker can inhale the excess smoke and…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Smoking Bans in Casinos

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Many smokers argue that a smoking ban infringes on their rights to enjoy a cigarette. But really, it’s the non-smoker whose rights are violated when they are forced to gamble or work in a cloud of secondhand smoke. “Research from Stanford and Tufts universities shows secondhand smoke is a danger to millions of casino patrons and thousands of workers” (Myers). People have a right to enjoy a casino without being in danger. Baskies sums it up well:…

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their right to smoke is not being taken away by a ban on outdoor public smoking on the National Mall. While certainly everyone has the right to expose themselves to whatever hazard they would like to, be it cigarettes, alcohol, or even illegal drugs, no one has the right to present someone else with hazards without their consent. Yes, everyone has the right to choose whether or not they will smoke. However, those that are exposed to second hand smoke in public places do not have the right to choose. Smoking in a private setting is acceptable as exposure for others is made when they choose to stay and exposure is limited. Typically in bars or taverns where smoking may be allowed, children are not allowed…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many smokers will argue about their rights to smoke, while conversely this stance can cause infringement on the nonsmoker’s rights to breathe clean air free from the effects of second-hand exposure. Smoking laws should be revisited and stricter laws should be enforced to protect the health of the innocent. To what degree can a recreational activity be allowed to cause harm to unwilling participants? Stricter law in this area is the only measure to protect those who are subjected to another individual’s addiction or habit.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three parties are hurt when the government decrees that no eating establishment can allow smoking. First, it negatively affects the right of the tobacco users who wants to smoke at their favorite spot. Next it takes away the freedom of business owners to choose how they will conduct business and how they will meet the interest of their customers. Third, it affects nonsmokers as occurred in Las Vegas Nevada where smoking was outlawed but it failed to have the desired effect of halting smoking. Owners of eating establishments were forced to stop providing a separate smoking area; in practice the business owners didn’t chase out customers who smoked in the place of business. It was a challenge to enforce and it…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking Ban Argument

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Years ago smokers could smoke almost anywhere with the exception of hospitals, confined areas and locations that stored flammables. Over time smokers began to be segregated into designated smoking areas, followed by bans of smoking inside public places, then designated areas out doors. Today many public and private locations have banned smoking on their grounds altogether, and many other places are considering or trying to enforce a no smoking policy as well. Ironically many smokers have been forced to move from their homes as no smoking policies prohibit smoking inside and outside their own residences.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking imposes a huge monetary cost upon society in two main ways. Firstly, through absenteeism from work as a result of health problems, this is bad for the economy and society. If the economy is in bad shape then people spend less money and go out less, therefore they interact less. If people interact less then society begins to stagnate.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays