Preview

Sissy Speech Code

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
531 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sissy Speech Code
Sissy After reading all three essays, and yes I did read all of them even though the last was a difficult read, I chose to write about the first one about speech codes on campus and the problems of free speech. The problem I see with this is that we’re all afraid to hurt someone’s feelings, it’s the “sissification of society”.
How are we to let our children and young adults grow up if we are telling them what they can and cannot say to voice their options. How are we as a society able to grow as thinkers if we can’t voice those thoughts without repercussion. I know the First Amendment does not protect against “offensive speech”, but any speech can be offensive to someone. So I say if your easily offended then grow some thicker skin and have an open mind. It’s just sad to also see these law students at Stanford University wanting to enact these “speech codes”, that they think censorship is okay provided that your motives are okay. When are motives okay to go against the First Amendment? How far will this go they tell us what we can’t say soon it will be what we can’t think then what we can’t do. They more I think about this topic the more I try to figure out where this type of thinking comes from. One aspect I can think of is the “entitlement” that people have these days. That things should be giving to them without
…show more content…
Why do we give participation trophies or ribbons to kids? It is giving them a false sense of accomplishment. They really didn’t earn a trophy, yes they participated in the event, but they didn’t do enough to earn a trophy to show that they gave that extra determination to be better than the next kid. When we don’t push our children to be better all they are going to do is settle for mediocrity. If we have a society and generation that just settles for that mediocrity where will it put us as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jon Katz, an American journalist and author, also argued: “Institutions that are supposed to be breeding grounds for original and innovative thought have embraced the forced re-ordering of moral conscience” (Katz). However, speech codes do not stifle freedom of speech. It merely adds to the exclusions of the first amendment in order to create a safe learning environment and equal opportunities for all. Speech codes, in no way, limit learning, in fact, they enhance learning…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many children that compete in youth sports receive trophies for their participation. The question is, are these trophies leaving a positive or a negative impact towards children. Supporting participation trophies, Lisa Heffernan states that it does teach children good values with her argument titled “In Defense of Participation Trophies”. Opposing participation trophies, Vivian Diller states that it does not prepare children for the real world with her argument titled “Do We All Deserve Gold? Setting Kids up to Fail”.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I comprehend Alan M Dershowitz’s speech of “A Real Test For Any Proposed Speech Code or Policy” as accurate because it can not be up to citizens to decide which words are offensive and which words are appropriate. More specifically, I believe that adding restrictions to Americans freedom of speech would be in total violation of the First Amendment and completely unrealistic to enforce. For example, Alan Dershowitz’s states "the proper response to offensive speech is to criticize and answer it, not censor it.” Although Harvard Law might counter this by saying that they didn’t want anyone at their school to view the offensive words of Tom Paulin. I maintain that freedom of speech is part of our foundation in America and we need to use it to benefit…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Bill of Rights, Amendment I states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Bill of Rights). These rights were basically protecting what people say, and write, however, we are slowly loosing those rights. We have to worry now about offending someone because of our language, or saying something that is considered politically incorrect. A quote that has made a big difference in my perception when dealing with people is “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”. (Lydgate) As I grow older, I see this to be so true. If you look around, you see people being offended more and more. When you please one group, then another group will be offended. There is no way to please everyone, even with claiming terms are politically correct/incorrect. We are in a vicious cycle of using a word in the proper context, it being misused, being changed to a politically correct word, then the word being misused again.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Participation Trophys

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page

    Participation trophies lose their meanings at times.youth athletes take them for granted. Coaches spend $2000-$3000 on participation trophies every year. Coaches could spend those funds on sports organization…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states that only if a person’s speech has substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others it may be censored. Most people take that how it is supposed to be taken. If you actually read the law, it is easy to see that many things…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the general public is asked to refrain from the use of a few words that may be offensive to others, the right to freedom of speech is not infringed upon. In most cases a group of concerned citizens vocalize the need to discontinue the use of a particular word that evokes discomfort in other citizens. For example, there is a campaign against the use of the word “retarded,” and it is called “Spread the Word to End the Word (Downes).” It is not required by law for every citizen of the United States to abstain from using the word “retarded,” so the right to freedom of speech has not been…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that by allowing students to censor the topics or views which they don’t approve of, society is actually polarizing students’ opinions of various situations on college campuses. If there is one “widely accepted view” because others have been by and large censored out, then anyone holding a different view would be more stringently opposed. In turn, those with this nonconformist view end up feeling attacked and are forced to go on the defensive. At that point instead of being able to have an informed discussion and debate the validity of each other’s opinions, neither side can sit down and have a rational discussion without attacking the other, or feeling attacked…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    swdsdsd

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. The First Amendment grants each citizen the right to freely express him or herself as he or she chooses. This is not without restraint. Network television and radio have the right to censor offensive content. NBC will never show full-frontal nudity. WWNO will never broadcast “bad” words. There are also restrictions for the sake of public safety. One can be arrested for yelling “fire” in a crowded theater because the panicked reaction might cause injury or death. This kind of rule has also caused great debate on whether the instructions to…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Freedom of speech issues are constantly in the media today. There are plenty of incidents where people’s constitutional rights were met with great and unnecessary force. The First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America guarantees the freedoms of speech, religion, assembly, press, and the right to petition the government. These freedoms are impeded when their freedoms are met with retort. When free speech is not allowed in the public sector, honesty is no longer accepted. This, in turn, sets the precedent of honesty as being looked down upon and considered rude. Why should someone’s opinions be punished because they don’t go along with what is standard or declared acceptable by others. By infringing on the freedom of someone’s speech, it is the same as punishing them for being who they are. Freedom of speech should not be obstructed or met with retort by the…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    paper

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is free speech and the dangers of limiting vocabulary only society’s choice of acceptable words? Is profanity even called for? Is it good or bad parenting to teach your children to use profanity at such a young age? Does censoring words hinder a person’s ability to express their opinion regarding something? Amendment One states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (Constitution).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Universities have the responsibility of teaching students new material that they are not familiar to and the students’ responsibility is to learn and interpret those ideas. The alternative to speech codes is education. If students are taught and informed about matters like offensive language and controversial topics they would have an understanding of how it can affect others. However, what if the violence breaks out because there are no speech codes that can regulate what a student can and cannot say? On many campuses there are already free speech zones where students can express their thoughts, but provided in a previous example verbal violence occurred between the religious speaker and the female student. Is this why the speech codes were created; to prevent students from acting in violence? Speech codes are the very thing that can cause violent reactions. Speech codes are used to restrict students however it is not educating students to do the right thing. Speech codes are also applied to most environments on campus even though in many circumstance they are not needed. Instead of solely restricting students from offensive speech on campus and in lecture school should educate students about offensive speech instead. The reason why educating students about offensive speech is important is because by educating the students the university will be avoiding any future conflicts between students. “Instead of learning that voicing one's opinions invites silencing, students would be taught that spirited debate is a vital necessity for the advancement of knowledge. And they would be taught that the proper response to ideas they oppose is not censorship, but argument on the merits” (Stone and Creeley Para. 11). Educating students uncomfortable topics is important for their…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the material in question. In almost every case, the effort to ban books is said…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today many children expect to always receive an award when participating in sports, clubs, or other activities. This sense of entitlement is greatly impacting the younger generation and teaching them they do not need to strive to do their best. It also teaches them to just do enough to fit in with others. Michele Borba says, “Kids know when they deserve a trophy. Those unearned accolades make kids hooked on those awards. There goes the internal motivations and the joy of doing your best. What is the point of effort? If everyone is going to get a trophy for just showing up and breathing” (Axelson). Kids who work above and beyond to improve aren’t getting the appropriate recognition due to the entitlement of others.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays