Preview

Siri

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Siri
Dominic Yang Li Ku
Address: Flat F, 4/F, 119-125 Caine Road, Hong Kongii• Email: Yangdominic@hotmail.com • Tel: (852) 9206-0970
EDUCATION
CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
Juris Doctor in Law; Latest Semester’s GPA: 3.42

July 2010

June 2008

UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
B.A.(Hons) in Philosophy and Comparative Literature; (Second Class Honors Division One)
Dean’s List Award: 2007-2008
I

AKITA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
HKU Student Exchange Program

Aug 2007

i

ST. PAUL LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL

May 2004

LEGAL EXPERIENCE i l
Barnes & Daly Solicitors – Legal Intern
• Advised supervising partners on the grounds of appeal against Hong Kong police’s screening system
• Led researches on various aspects of public international law and Hong Kong constitutional law
• Drafted documents including letters to the DOJ, client’s statements and other legal correspondences
• Participated in client interviews and sat in various court hearings

ii Jan 2010

i | | Aug 2009

Parkside Chambers – Summer Pupil sii
• Researched on a winding-up case for a Hong Kong company
• Participated in client interviews on a land dispute case and sat in various court hearings
• Collaborated with other colleagues on a research project for an indecent assault case
• Assisted counsel in formulating arguments for a traffic accident case
Faculty of Law, CUHK – Research Assistant)ii
• Compiled part of a Hong Kong Judicial Review database that stretches back to the 70s
LEADERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITIES
CUHK MOOTING TEAM
• Red Cross Humanitarian Moot 2010 (Lead Oralist)

l

i

i

May 2010

iAug 2010

CUHK ENGLISH DEBATING TEAM
I
• Joint University Debating Championships 2009
• Hong Kong Intervarsity Debating Championships 2009
• Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships 2009
AWARDS
Red Cross Humanitarian Moot 2010; Top 10 Overall Memorials
Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships; ESL Grand Finalist, 1st Runner-up |
Hong Kong Intervarsity

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the several major tasks of this kind of lawyer will be to help counsel their customers in a legal case. To be able to…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of Dean v Phung is one which clearly reveals the prevalence of judicial independence. On the surface it is a case which clarifies the rules governing consent in a medical context; it also reveals social issues regarding the balance of responsibility and risk between individuals and society. Furthermore, it raises questions about the validity of exemplary damages. This case note discusses the issues raised, judicial reasoning, and analyses the decision in the context of policy objectives in the Civil Liability Act.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “How has the law regarding the common law right to reasons for decision differed between Australia and the UK in light of Osmond? Have things changed in light of more recent developments? To what extent should the principles of common law judicial review regarding the right to reasons for decision adapt themselves to the principles of accountability?”…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Haidian district no.8 fucheng GanGuKou way a north street, number 12, 3 floors China consumers' association…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The lawyer is the lead in the legal team and has passed the bar examination and have a license to practice law in their respective state(s). In larger firms, the lawyers can be assigned as partners and associates. The partner has actual ownership in the firm whereas the associate are usually on salary as an employee, not being an owner in the firm. The supervising attorney in a large firm is responsible for the actions and work of the lawyers under him/her. The paralegal is responsible for the litigation process. Some of the responsibilities of the paralegal are preparing casework, investigations, preparing briefings, conducting interviews and scheduling and maintaining client contacts. The support staff are those individuals within the firm that work collectively to accomplish assignments. Investigators are those that conduct the research and gather facts regarding the case to validate or find fault in legal issues of the case. The information technologists (IT) individuals are those who maintain the software and hardware in the firm and keep the necessary equipment operational.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Applied Management Project

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages

    17. Tsang (1999), “Law society Gazette-Focus ' '. Available at www.lawgazette.co.uk/archives/1999-10-08/00000012.html, (Accessed: 27th July, 2010)…

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tommy Giger Essay

    • 4833 Words
    • 20 Pages

    From, Joseph Thomas Verghis, 1/11 Gipps Street, Wollongong, NSW 2500 Ph: 0411 646 085 Email: josephthomas555@gmail.com…

    • 4833 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophers and the Law

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexandrowicz, Austin, Cairns-Way, Hux, Locke, Mavraganis, Mete, Monahan, Murphy, Olivo, O'Malley, Rock, and Philip Sworden. Dimensions of Canadian and international law in the 21st Century. Toronto, Canada. Emond Montgomery Publications Limited. 2004.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Evidence Rule

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Administrative Law, Trimester 2, 2012 Assignment Question „[The] statutory “no evidence” ground of judicial review is both wider and more specific than was the case with “no evidence” grounds for judicial review at common law.‟ Justice Kirby, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] 210 CLR 222, at [111]. Of the judgments in Rajamanikkam, which do you prefer, and what justification can you provide for your preference? In answering the question, you should read the following three prescribed cases. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam (2002) 210 CLR 222 Television Capricornia Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1986) 13 FCR 511 SGFB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) FCAFC 422 You may, however, also choose to read the following supplementary reading. The supplementary reading consists of the following three cases. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Sunchen Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) FCA 21 The supplementary reading also consists of the following article. Andrew Pinchin, ‘No Evidence’ and ‘Mistake of Fact’: A Reconsideration (2007) 55 AIAL Forum 59-85 This supplementary reading might assist your understanding, but students will not be penalised for not referring to it, nor rewarded for referring to it. The focus should be on the prescribed reading for the assignment. As this is a reflective and not a research essay, you should not refer to material outside the prescribed and supplementary reading. You should follow the advice below, but also the advice given in the Study Guide on the assignment. Note especially the reference to penalties if the 1500 word limit is exceeded. You should also follow any further advice on the question provided in lecture notes. Some advice on the assignment The question requires students to reflect on primary material, rather than merely…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apple's Siri Analysis

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The article introduces the Siri---a voice controlled virtual personal assistant from Apple that relies on artificial intelligence, about how it works as a search engine. The author uses a small study at The Arora Report to analyze Siri may change people’s habit. The new habit will be using voice to find exactly what one wants without having to comb through a large number of results, some of which may not be relevant. This article also indicates that Siri searches information by asking a question in ordinary language and quickly finding the answer; it makes Google search look like a horse and buggy compared to a car. The problem for Google is that it makes most money from the most common searches. It is only a matter of time before Siri shifts search revenues from Google to Apple.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Rights

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kennedy, Brian. "Walking the Fine Line in Taiwan 's New Criminal Code." Taiwan Review. 01 August 2003. Government Information Office, Republic of China (Taiwan). 10 Nov 2007 <http://taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=873&CtNode=128>.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluation Letter

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    motions in several cases. During the final weeks of her externship, Ms. Extern researched the…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kim, Shin & Yu 12th Floor, Leema Building # 146-1, Susong-dong Chongro-ku, Seoul Korea Tel.: Fax: +82 2 735 5822 +82 2 739 6606/6182…

    • 5019 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dobinson, Ian and Roebuck, Derek Introduction to Law in the Hong Kong SAR, Sweet & Maxwell, 2001…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hong Kong Legal System

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    questions addressed: HK sources of law, jury service and reciprocity between the HKSAR and PRC legal systems. The examination was held over two hours and written on a closed book basis. As with past exams, the examiners prepared a list of factors in advance of the examination that were relevant to answering each question. Thus, to answer the questions successfully, candidates needed to address a majority of those factors and to do so in a in a structured and relevant manner. Candidates should have also been able to express themselves in a clear and succinct manner. In order to answer the questions satisfactorily, candidates needed to have been able to cite relevant sources of law and/or major commentators in each area, as appropriate. The overall standard was not very good and was, impressionistically, not as good as in previous sessions. There were a very small number of papers that could be said to have attained even a very good, let alone excellent, standard. The vast majority were at the level of a very bare pass. On the whole, the same reasons for the poor standard of performance were present as in previous sessions: lack of relevant knowledge, lack of comprehension of the scope and parameters of each question, failure to address the question adequately either by directing material to answer the specific question or by responding to only one part of the question, and an inadequate standard of written English necessary to clearly communicate a response to the question. However, on this occasion it seemed that these factors had a detrimental impact on the performance of a wider group of candidates.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays