Single sex schools should not be banned
Do you want your children study in single sex schools? Single sex schools are the schools that have all same gender students. There are many very famous single sex schools in America like Wellesley College, Smith College, and Mount Holyoke College, which are recorded in the long history of excellence in the education sector. Many people love single sex schools because they think they can get better education than study in a coeducation environment (Sax, 2011; Sommers, 2011). Nevertheless, some support means that some others are not supporting single sex schools. According to the article “Single-Sex Schools: Separate but Equal?” (2011), readers can know that a report in “Science” magazine shows that there is no evidence to show that single sex schools are better than coeducation in academic outputs and single sex schools may also “reinforce sex stereotypes” (n.p.). People who think single sex schools should be banned believe that single sex may do harm to students in academic and personal character area (Fabes, 2011; Sherwin, 2011; Williams, 2011). However, this paper will show people that single sex schools should not be banned because they provide a better academic environment, and they give parents an extra option to choose the right schools for their children.
One of the reasons that single sex schools should not be banned is they give students a great environment to study. First of all, students can study any subject they want without the stereotyped thinking about the “boys’ subjects” or “girls’ subjects”. It is “normal” that female students are more likely to study language and literature which are “girls’ subjects”, and male students would prefer math and science which are “boys’ subjects” (Sommers, 2011). Why this is normal? McAuliffe (2011), who is the president of Bryn Mawr, tells people that, “Cultural force [leads] many young women to believe that there are some fields of study that just aren’t for them” (n.p.). Single sex schools make this kind of “normal” become more normal, which students can learn any subject no matter that they are male or female learn math or languages. In the article “Know Your Child”, Sax (2011) shows people that German researchers did an experiment, which was that they separated 401 girls into two classrooms, which are one single-sex classroom and one coed classroom. The result after one term was the girls in the single-sex classroom less consider physics as a “boys’ subject”. Furthermore, some reports show that the temperature of the classrooms influences the study differently between male and females (Salomone, 2011). According to the article “Single-Sex Education: The Pros and Cons”, Stanberry (2011) tells people that female students may get better academic output in a warm classroom; however, a cool classroom is better for male students. If it is true, single sex schools can provide the different temperature classrooms for male and female students for their better study. In a word, single schools should not be banned because they provide the great study environment for students.
Except the beautiful academic environment, another reason for single sex schools should not be banned is that they give parents more option to choose for their children. Most parents want their children to have the best education. Single sex schools are good options for parents, but no one says you must choose single sex schools. Not everyone matches single sex schools’ education system, but some match. People should not take away parents’ right of choosing schools for their children. Sommers (2011), claims in the article “A Necessary Option” that we cannot judge single sex schools as good or bad but “the option [of single sex schools] has produced many heartening successes in the public system – especially in poorer districts where parents lack the resources to send their children to private single-sex schools” (n.p.). It means that single sex schools give poor...
References: Fabes, R. (2011, October 30). What our research shows. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/
McAuliffe, J. D. (2011, October 28). What we’ve discovered. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/
Salomone, R. C. (2011, October 28). More federal oversight. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/
Sax, L. (2011, October 17). Know your child. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/
Sherwin, G. (2011, October 17). Segregation is not a cure. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/
Single-sex schools: separate but equal? (2011, n.d.). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/
Sommers, C. H. (2011, October 28). A necessary option. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/
Sommers, C. H. (2011, October 12). Column: fight proposed ban on single sex schools. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/story/2011-10-12/single-sex-school-education/50744974/1
Stanberry K. (2011, n.d.). Single-sex education: the pros and cons. Great Schools. Retrieved from http://www.greatschools.org/
Williams, V. L. (2011, October 28). Don’t be tempted. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/
Please join StudyMode to read the full document