Singer's Argumentative Analysis

Arguing that our responsibilities are changed because of geographical distance or an empathy for a certain group has value as a clarification of how we are likely to act in real-world conditions, however Singer's argument target what the affluent are morally obliged to do without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance. The nature of providing support to organisations in forms of small proportion of income, as Singer suggested, is the necessary amount and method. This means that it is challenging to raise even any intuitive protestations to it. To do so would be to be one of those petty people who protest about a 1% tax hike, despite the improvements to their children's schools and local roads, for example.