Preview

Simons Vs Stevenson Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
108 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Simons Vs Stevenson Case
The trial Simons V. Steverson started in August, 1997. A Los Angeles filmmaker name Shawn Simons was in the production of an original movie picture and hired a New York entertainment lawyer named Mark Steverson. Steverson who claimed to be a well experienced entertainment lawyer was employed by Simons to write up contracts with anyone related to the production such as actors, crew members, location agreements, loans, and including an agreement between Allerton and Silverline. Such acts were to be completed before the upcoming Film Distribution Market on October 19,1997. Steverson failed in fulfilling the agreement before the set date and had completely neglected all of his responsibilities.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lavr Johnson Wheaton Case
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lavr Johnson Wheaton Case

    Wheaton is liable for the manager’s injuries. Under the doctrine of Respondeat Superior Liability. The principle in this case would be Wheaton and the agent would be LaVar Johnson. Under this doctrine an employer is liable for torts committed by agents, who are employees and who commit the tort while acting within the scope their employment, in addition, it also makes the principal liable both for an employees' negligence and for her intentional torts (pg. 944).…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case Outlines
    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Case Outlines

    The court ultimately ruled with the defendant. The main reason was the language of the contract. The terms and conditions were too specific and definite to rule any other way but in the favor of Billy Cannon, as the absence of the Commissioner’s contract was…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jeffrey MacDonald Case
    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jeffrey MacDonald Case

    Jeffrey MacDonald was born on October 12, 1942. Jeffrey MacDonald was an intelligent and handsome man. He had a very beautiful family, including a wife and two young daughters. He attended Princeton University for 3 years in New Jersey while he was married to Colette MacDonald. While he was still in school at Princeton University his daughter Kim was born. After he was done at Princeton University he went to medical school in Chicago and later on had his other daughter Kristen. The family later on in life moved to North Carolina where Jeffrey would later on receive a job offer as a doctor in the Special Forces. Early in the year of 1970 Jeffery and his wife found out they were having another child.…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sibler v Stacey s
    • 4506 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Sibler v Stacey s

    2 The plaintiff Arnold Silber was then and is now the President and sole shareholder of the plaintiff Value Industries Ltd. ("Value"), the owner of Staceys. The defendants Dale Hicks and Ken Chu were at all material times employed by the defendant British Columbia Television Broadcasting System Ltd. ("B.C.T.V."). On the date of the events giving rise to this action, November 25th, 1980, Hicks and Chu were operating as a news reporting team. Hicks was the on-camera journalist who delivered the commentary and Chu was the cameraman.…

    • 4506 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Larry Ross Case Analysis
    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Larry Ross Case Analysis

    1. Does Larry Ross provide an accurate and realistic picture of how organizations operate? If you think so, is it true of all, most, some or only few organizations? Why did you answer as you did?…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Russell V Queen Case Study
    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Russell V Queen Case Study

    This case fell according to the JCPC under powers in favor of the federal government. The reasoning for this case is not convincing. The reason for this is that it does not ban alcohol for the entire country, but instead merely restricts and regulates it. The legislation for this case could have fallen under: section 92 (9), which deals with saloons, taverns, and shops; section 92 (13) which is about property and civil rights in the province; or section 92 (16) which are all matters of local or private nature. This law was about restricting how people were able to obtain alcohol, meaning how it is sold. Once it is sold it also becomes property within a province. Therefore the argument that the JCPC made that it…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Robert martin jones case
    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Robert martin jones case

    are dual responsibilities working in this case. Robin need to except her part in the downfall of this…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Amistad Questions
    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Amistad Questions

    He is the leading attorney in the Supreme Court case, using Cinque’s words to win the trial…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Justin King Answer
    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Justin King Answer

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    May God Have Mercy (John C. Tucker): A True Story of Crime and Punishment
    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages

    May God Have Mercy (John C. Tucker): A True Story of Crime and Punishment

    Steve Arey and Terry Jordan were young, inexperienced lawyers who should have never even been considered for a capital case. Judge Persin, the presiding Judge in the case, however, decided on these two gentlemen because other more experienced lawyers refused to take the case because of the huge financial sacrifice it would require. Albeit public speculation that Judge Persin's previous profession as a prosecutor had led him to heavily favor the prosecution, his decision stood. The two prosecutors who Arey and Jordan would be opposed by were Mickey McGlothlin and Tom Scott. Both prosecutors had far more experience than the defense lawyers, but that didn't stop Judge Persin from appointing Arey and Jordan to the case. It was an obvious mismatch, intentional or not, and was just the beginning of many problems that would arise for the defendant's case.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case (4th Amendment)
    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Case (4th Amendment)

    -The court interpreted the plain view rule, for the offer it is a risk but after…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    English Law case
    • 270 Words
    • 1 Page

    English Law case

    Fill in the notes for the landmark case you selected to connect with your topic in the previous lessons. You may use the official court documents for the case and articles written about the case to fill in the required information below.…

    • 270 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Deal v. Hamilton County Dept. of Education
    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Deal v. Hamilton County Dept. of Education

    References: Find Law. (2012). Deal v. Hamilton County BD. Of Educ. 03-5396. Retrieved from http://caselaw.findlaw.com/summary/opinion/us-6th-circuit/2004/12/16/127294.html…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Van Orden v. Perry
    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Van Orden v. Perry

    Thomas Van Orden, an American Lawyer, challenged the State of Texas claiming that the placement of the Ten Commandment monument on state capital grounds was unconstitutional because it symbolized government endorsement of religion, violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment (Van Orden v. Perry Case Brief). The Supreme Court held the monument constitutional as it was merely a recognition of the Ten Commandment in American history and served no religious purposes (Van Orden v. Perry). The Supreme Court also noted that many other government buildings, including itself, have some form of the Commandments as the recognition of its important historical meaning as a source of law (Van Orden v. Perry).…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Essay
    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Essay

    In 1847, the St. Louis courthouse ruled against Scott but he was given the right to a second trial. In 1850, in the second trial, the jury decided that the Scotts should be freed. Mrs. Emerson did not want to lose the Scotts, so she appealed her case to the Missouri State Supreme Court. The Missouri State Supreme Court reversed the decision in 1852. In St. Louis Federal Court, Dred Scott sued Mrs. Emerson’s brother, John Sanford. The Court ruled in favor of Sanford. Dred Scott appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More