Preview

Similarities Between The MRTP Act And The Competition Act

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
282 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between The MRTP Act And The Competition Act
The MRTP Act was a precursor to the Competition Act and sought to legislate over issues relating to restrictive and monopolistic trade practices. There are areas of similarities between the MRTP Act and the Competition Act. The primary distinction between the enactments stems from the legislative objec¬tive. While the thrust of the Competition Actis to promote competition, the objective of the MRTP Act was to prevent economic concentration and restrictive trade practices.
Even in respect of merger control provisions currently found in the Competition Act, the MRTP Act used concentration of economic power as the basis of merger control. Chapter III of the MRTP Act sought to regulate activities of undertakings whose asset value crossed certain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since 20th century the competition has increased to global level. Canada was the first nation to enact the first competition statute of modern times. It was an Act to prevent and supress group formed in check of Trade was passed one year before United States passed the most famous statute on competition law i.e. Sherman Act of 1890. The competition law gained huge recognition in European nations like Germany, Sweden, and Norway which were slowly adapting Anti-Cartel Laws.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A contract is a special kind of voluntary agreement, either written or oral, that involves legally binding obligations between two or more parties (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 126, para. 1). A contract protects each party with the legal means of enforcing a right or redressing a wrong if another party does not perform his or her obligations following to the terms of the contract.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monopoly occurs when a company has such a large portion of the product market that it can set its own price despite the market equilibrium. Monopolies date back to Standard Oil Co. Inc. in 1870. Standard Oil Co. Inc. controlled also the entire oil market in its time and made huge profits by doing so. The Sherman Antitrust Act was put in place to combat monopolies and their power in the marketplace.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egt1 Task 3

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Government imposed antitrust acts/industrial regulations are to protect consumers of an industry’s actions pertaining to price and quantity preventing a monopoly to that end benefiting society.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ac 208 Examiner's Report

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages

    provisions for example, the 10% limit in s 76(9A), the fair value requirement and the type of…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 4 main pieces of legislation that are collectively known as the Anti-trust laws. They are the Sherman Antitrust Act, The Federal Trade commission Act, The Clayton Antitrust Act and the Celler-Kefauver Act. The Sherman Antitrust Act is legislation enacted to protect Americans against monopolies. It makes it illegal to make contracts or conspire to restrict trade or commerce. It also outlaws monopolies. The Federal Trade Commission Act established the Federal Trade Commission and set up how it would be run, with a group of 5 people that did not follow party lines that would be chosen for 7 years terms and would make sure no antitrust laws were being broken. The Clayton Antitrust Law closed a lot of the loopholes that the…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressives had beliefs such as industrialization and urbanization had created troubling social and political problems. Progressives wanted to bring about reforms that would correct what they saw as problems and injustices. The Antitrust Laws were designed to prevent and punish anti-competitive practices. Progressives complained that the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was inadequate and ineffective in limiting the abuses of big businesses. The Progressives made states pass the antitrust laws to make cartels and monopolistic practices illegal and to regulate railroad rates.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Trace and agree book value of reacquired franchise rights to respective impairment analysis schedule to ensure no impairment losses.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I believe that the banks are not acting in a responsible fashion with their solicitation of consumers for credit cards and credit card lines. As mentioned in the article, the banks are advertising "promotions of credit card and debt to increase limits" in an attempt to gather additional consumers. I think by advertising these credit cards to college and high school students, and then providing them with higher credit limits and promotions, the banks are aiming to increase the number of irresponsible spenders in today's society to make money.…

    • 3370 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May of 1998, Microsoft Corporation was charged with violating parts of the Sherman act…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is the correlation between ‘restraint of trade doctrine’ and ‘modern competition law’? This article seeks to examine the relationship between the two by tracing back cases when the Sherman Act was newly enacted and the interpretation given by the US Supreme Court. The article has two parts. Part I deals with the doctrine of restraint of trade in order to…

    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Except as permitted under the Act (for example, any fair dealing for the purposes of…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    AntiTrust Laws

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States has a free market. This is very beneficial to consumers because it enables them to have a variety of products to choose from and it allows them to buy them at competitive prices. If it were not for the antitrust laws that the government put into effect there would not be much of a market. There would only be big businesses that produced everything and they would set the price consumers would pay. Antitrust laws protect companies from one another so they compete for business and are not forced out of business by a larger company. It is because of these antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act (1890), the Clayton Act (1914), and the Federal Trade Commission Act (1914), that Americans today are able to have a free market and businesses are able to compete.…

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust Laws Effective

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The antitrust laws accomplish these goals by promoting and fostering competition in the marketplace and preventing anticompetitive mergers and business practices.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective enforcement of the antitrust laws in order to eliminate restrictions on competition is the prime objective for every competition authority. Our focus is continuously on the most serious violations, such as horizontal agreements and concerted practices between competitors. The harm done to consumers and society of such activities is undisputable which need to be curbed.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays