At first glance Senator McCarthy and Abigail Williams, the antagonists during McCarthyism and throughout The Crucible respectfully, seem very different, however, their actions and mannerisms are mirrored in many aspects. In both cases the antagonists influence their trials greatly. McCarthy went so far as to run the trials while Abigail manipulated the judge to ensure her triumph. Those who did not agree with their practices or who openly spoke against them were immediately accused or declared guilty of the crime, whether it was witchcraft or communist activity. Both McCarthy and Abigail can be observed withholding or creating evidence to suit their goals. In one instance Senator Joseph McCarthy keep evidence supplied in a trial in a secret envelope. The accused, Milo Radulovich, was not allowed to see the evidence and neither was his lawyer. Yet he was still found guilty. Abigail Williams’s accusations were also made with little to no evidence. When she accused Elizabeth Protector of witchcraft she had no proof, certainly nothing concrete. Abigail simply declared that Elizabeth had sent her spirit on her. She then stabbed herself in a further bid for support. It can also be observed that when the accusations began in both the cases of McCarthy and Abigail, they targeted those citizens of lower class and social standing. McCarthy targets Annie Lee Moss, an African American woman who had been working as a communications clerk in the US Army Signal Corps in the Pentagon. In Good Night and Good Luck Edward R. Murrow address McCarthy’s tactics stating, “There are three Annie Lee Moss’ in the phonebook and yet only one of them is black.” Abigail Williams first names Tituba, Sarah Good and Goody Osborne. Three characters who are seen as lower class citizens by their fellow people. Both antagonists exploited the situation of fear established in both 1950’s America fear of communism and Salem’s fear of witchcraft. While McCarthy used this fear to gain power and manipulate others into sharing his ideals, Abigail took it further and also used it for her own personal gain and later for revenge. The power they had gained prevented others from speaking out against them in fear of their own lives. However, there were instances in which other powerful people spoke out against them and these instances led to the downfall of both McCarthy and Abigail. Although both suffered a downfall and were reduced to much lesser stance, neither of them received any form of punishment for their actions. After being questioned about the false accusations and deplorable tactics by the senate, McCarthy was merely moved to the back bench. He received no jail time and although he became an alcoholic, did not suffer nearly as much as the people he accused did. On the other hand, Abigail was able to flee from Salem and become a prostitute in Boston but was never sought after. It can be observed after delving into both McCarthy and Abigail’s characters, that though they had some minor differences they were remarkably similar for being from such different periods of America’s history.
The goals of the protagonists of The Crucible and Good Night, and Good Luck were nearly identical in every way. Both John Proctor and Edward R. Murrow were respected and greatly influential members of their respectful societies. Proctor was regarded by the people of Salem as an honest, hard-working, family man. Edward R. Murrow was an established, likeable, journalist who was able to influence the media greatly. Murrow used his television program, “See It Now”, to draw the public’s attention to the extreme wrongness of McCarthy’s trials. Murrow wished to expose McCarthy’s accusations as fraudulent and save innocent people from the loss of their livelihoods. Similarly, John Proctor wanted to expose Abigail Williams for the fraud she was and save innocent people from being killed as a result of their apparent guilt, particularly his wife. Although his involvement with Abigail was much more personal than that of Edward R. Murrow’s with McCarthy, he was working towards the same end goal of stopping the trials. Both men knew that upon calling for McCarthy and Abigail’s accusations to be examined, they themselves would suffer greatly. And they did. Murrow and his crew are accused of communist activity by McCarthy himself, though there was no evidence presented against them. Upon Proctor accusing Abigail of falsely condemning people as witches, he himself was accused of using witchcraft. Abigail and the other girls supported this accusation by pretending that Proctor was harming them using his supposed abilities. Even though both characters achieve their goals and stop the antagonists, it is not without cost to themselves. Proctor makes the ultimate sacrifice for the cause, in his death which ended the witchcraft trials and their subsequent hangings. Murrow suffered too, although on a much smaller scale as he lost his television show and was made to be part of another that he despised. It is clearly shown that both protagonists achieved their similar goals, regardless of the extreme differences in consequences.
Throughout The Crucible and Good Night, and Good Luck it can be observed that the majority of the unnamed public did not agree with the ideals of the antagonists. These people seemed to wish for the same end to the trials as the protagonists, though many of them did not speak publicly. In The Crucible, upon Rebecca Nurse being accused of witchcraft Proctor presented the court “… A sort of a testament. The people signing it declared their good opinion of Rebecca… They were all members of the church [who had] never seen [any] sign [she] had dealings with the Devil,” which shows that even though 91 people were prepared to help Rebecca Nurse, they did not do so without prompting. This representation of the general public’s view was much more subtle in Good Night, and Good Luck. After the episode of Murrow’s show in which he expressed his controversial views on McCarthy and the phones began ringing wildly, it was found that there was a 15 to 1 approval rating of what Murrow was doing. The major difference in the actions of the public in the two periods of time is that people in Salem allowed their names to be associated with the accused, Rebecca Nurse, by signing a testament to her character. While those in the era of McCarthyism were too fearful of the likelihood that they would be accused and their livelihood ruined, to associate their names with those like Murrow. It is evident that in both eras of America’s history the views of the general public were aligned with the protagonists rather than the antagonists but they were too fearful to express their views publicly.
Upon analysing Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible and George Clooney’s movie Good Night, and Good Luck, Senator Joseph McCarthy’s hunt for communists in 1950’s America can be observed as being deeply reminiscent of the Salem witch trials that were held nearly three centuries previously. Throughout this paper the truly remarkable similarities between not only the antagonists of these eras and their fictional counterparts, but the protagonists and the general public, were discussed. It was found that there were only a few differences between the people and their actions in both time periods and many of these were quite inconsequential in the end.