Preview

Similarities Between Samurais And Knights

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
451 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Samurais And Knights
Do you ever wonder what would happen if knights and samurais lived together? Even though they lived in completely different places around the world they developed a similar culture. So were the similarities between knights and samurais greater than the the differences they had back then? My thesis is that even though both knights and samurais never met they were more similar than they were different.
One reason why samurais and knights were more similar than different is because of the way they were trained when they were little and the social system they had. The social system they had was very similar starting with a figurehead in the top of both samurai and knights social system. Both of them also had a military leader and lords with lots

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knights Vs Samurai Dbq

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article “knights and samurai” a document based investigation it clearly shows how a samurai would win on a one on one battle against the knights. While knights and samurais have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in Armor, training, and beliefs.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even before the Kamakura period the Japanese warrior had begun his ascent to a higher social status. During the Heian period collateral branches of the imperial line, the Minamoto and Taira clans, represented two of the greatest warrior associations. Wars and battles that broke out during the eleventh century in the Kanto area presented the local warriors and the powerful clans with the chance to continue to build up their power (Schirokauer 181). During Kamakura period the provincial warrior class had managed to consolidate political power at the expense of the nobility. Under the Minamoto clan leader, Yorimoto, the Taira clan was defeated in the Gempei War, a bakufu or "tent government" was established – which demonstrated the military origins of his power - and the emperor named him shogun. The shogun had delegated power under the control of the emperor – which by this time was merely theoretical – and would represent an institution in Japanese politics that would last until the nineteenth century (Schirokauer 289). The shogun maintained his power through the loyalty of vassals - warriors who vowed service to a lord in exchange for military protection and land rights. This loyalty would become the characteristic ideal of the samurai warrior.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai Dbq Analysis

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think that the Samurai would win in a battle against a knight. While knights ad samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the Samurai and this can be seen in weapons, training, and their honor code…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Musui’Story is a samurai’s autobiography that describes the Tokugawa society. Katsu was born as the third son of Otani family, and was given away to a family with hereditary privilege. Unlike Hagakure: The book of the Samurai, and other Samurai books written functionally. Musui’Story taught all Samurai after him a lesson by telling his unworthy and complicated life of a samurai’s way, running, cheating, lying, challenges and triumphs. This essay would analyze Katsu an a subject to demonstrate the real samurai’s life reflecting the class dedifferentiation in the late Tokugawa Era.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knights and Samurai have many similarities. They are different too, because of their culture, and skills. While they have differences and similarities they both would have a chance to win if they were at war. The Knights and Samurai have a 50, 50 chance to win because of their armor, training, and code.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason why I think the similarities are greater than differences is social position. The reason why I think social position is because; “The life of a samurai was not his own but belonged entirely to his lord, and it was the duty of a (samurai) to consider this at all times….”. [Doc B]This…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    European and Japanese feudalism were similar in that they had a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system. The Japanese classes were the shogun (similar to a king in Europe), who held all the power. Then the daimyo, who owned the land, (similar to the lords and nobles in Europe), divided their land to the lesser samurais (similar to the European knights), and the same to the peasants, artisans, farmers, and merchants (similar to the serfs in Europe). In both Europe and Japan, the hierarchy was held together as a land-for-loyalty exchange. Both Japanese and European feudalism was based on mutual obligation, but the Japanese problems of internal attacks led to them begin using a feudal system for military aspects, while the Europeans foreign invasions led to them begin using a feudal system to protect and economically grow.…

    • 566 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The samurai (or bushi) were the soldiers of premodern Japan. They later created up the ruling military category that eventually became the best ranking social caste of the Edo amount (1603-1867). Samurai used a variety of weapons like bows and arrows, spears and guns, however their main weapon and image was the arm.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All in all, samurai and knights have more differences than they do similarities. This includes their armour, views on death, and of course their loyalty to their lords. Although they both had similar loyalty rules, the differences in how they served their lord and others…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knights Dbq

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin Knights and Samurai have a lot of common traits, but they also have differences. Traits that they both share are, they are warriors who protect their land. But a difference is that they have different weapons,armor,training and different religions. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be given to the knight and this can be seen in their training,armor,and their Honor Code.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered what the similarities and the differences were between the Samurai and knights? Samurai and knights were very strong warriors in the medieval era, they had different cultural ideas, but Samurai and Knight also had similarities. Samurai and Knights were similar, but also different in some areas. The similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at three areas, social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai and Knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint. The Japanese called their warriors Samurai, and the Europeans called their warriors Knights. They both swore oaths of loyalty to noble lords and fought to the death to defend them. This happened at the same time even though Japan and Europe were thousands of miles apart.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Body Paragraph#1: Both the Europeans and the Japanese had successful warriors that helped them succeed. In both feudal Japan and Europe, constant warfare made warriors the most important class. Called the “Knights” in Europe and “Samurai” in Japan, the warriors served their local lords. In both cases, Knight and Samurais were bound by a code of ethics. Knights were supposed to agree to the concept of Chivalry, while the Samurai were bound by the Bushido, or “The way of the warrior.” Both Knight and Samurai rode horses into battles, used swords, and wore armor. The European armor, which was worn by the knights, was usually all metal, made of chain, or plate metal. Japanese…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Europeans and the Japanese have many aspects of feudalism in common, but also many that differ. Their feudalisms are more differences than similarities. The differences include their cultural and political aspects. They have similarities in the social aspects.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics