Preview

Similarities Between Pol Pot And Napoleon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
920 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Pol Pot And Napoleon
What is it that brings all dictators together in comparison? Is it their ruthless actions towards others? Could it be their thirst for power? Or maybe it's the fact that all dictators use others to gain for themselves. "He [Napoleon] would only be too happy to let you make your decisions by yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where would we be?" (Orwell page 50). These examples prove Napoleon, ruler of Animal Farm, and Pol Pot, ruler of Cambodia, are indeed similar. Pol Pot was Dictator of Cambodia and head of the Khmer Rogue from 1975-1979. The Khmer Rogue was a communist party within Cambodia. The Rogue first initiated a coup d'ētat in 1970, which sparked a civil war which lasted 5 years …show more content…
For starters, both Napoleon and Pol Pot made attempts to rid parts of their 'old societies'. To do so, Napoleon burned all human tools and avoided the Manor House. He also pushed the animals to work harder than ever on the farm. "All that year the animals worked like slaves. But they were happy to work; they grudged no effort or sacrifice well aware that everything they did was for the benefit of themselves and those who would come after them." (Orwell page 5) Similarly, Pol Pot destroyed all existing jobs and forced everyone to work back breaking hours on a farm to create a classless peasant society. Secondly, both rulers used the aspect of fear to control the other people/animals in the community. Napoleon always roamed around with his retinue of dogs to drill fear into anyone willing to challenge his authority. He was always quick to kill anyone that might be against him, even if the evidence was not prominent. In the same way, Pol Pot used detention centers such as S-21, to drive some into such fear that they confessed to things they were innocent of. The last parallel between both rulers is that they both adopted names that made them appear to be friendly. Although this was deceptive, the point was to brainwash all into thinking that their ruler was a friend, not a foe. For example, Napoleon went by the title Comrade Napoleon in the beginning of the novel to gain the animals trust and support. "Loyalty and obedience are more important." (Orwell page 50). Likewise, Pol Pot changed his title to Brother Number One. What brings Napoleon and Pol Pot together in comparison, is their violent tactics, controlling power, and use of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is quite clear that they were similar when we know the story is criticising h Soviet Union. Other than that, pig can also represent the idea of greed that help the reader understand Stalin’s personality which always took advantage of other people like boxer(his loyal citizens). Orwell used Napoleon as a pig to represent Stalin successfully, the characteristic of Napoleon is perfectly connected to Stalin’s and the events that happened when they became the leader are identical. As both turned a peaceful government into dictatorship with a tyrant which Stalin/Napoleon…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Pol Pot took over Cambodia, it was one of the most horrible genocides next to the Holocaust, in the 1970’s; this was a big part of history. In March 1970, Marshal Lon Nol, a Cambodian politician who had previously served as prime minister, and his pro-American associates staged a successful overthrow to depose Prince Sihanouk as head of state. At this time, the Khmer Rouge had gained members and was positioned to become a major player in the civil war due to its alliance with Sihanouk. The Communist Party of Kampuchea (CPK), otherwise known as the Khmer Rouge, took control of Cambodia on April 17, 1975. The CPK created the state of Democratic Kampuchea in 1976 and ruled the country until…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the memoir, first they killed my father by Loung Ung, the author demonstrates how the Khmer Rouge use techniques of brain washing, food ration in order to be loyal to pol pot. Also In First They Killed My Father Loung and her family were invaded by the Khmer Rouge, who lied about the United States bombing Phonm Penh. Loung and her family had to leave to go to different villages and they stayed for a while but then they went to the camp. When they arrived to the camp they had to forget there old lives and obey Pol Pot laws.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were two of the most evil men in history, responsible for countless atrocities. They had many similarities as well. Both men committed genocide to further their political agenda, massively improved the militaries of their respective countries, had their own different groups of secret police and spies, and finally they were both tyrannical totalitarian dictators. Despite sharing many similarities, their government structure and political philosophies were very different. Adolf Hitler was a Fascist who believed in a highly centralized government with himself at the top of the pyramid. Joseph Stalin was a communist who believed in collectivism and instilling fear into his political opposition. Although there are…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Hitler and Stalin both employed a special police force to help control the country under their totalitarian rule, Hitler’s force relied on having secret police everywhere while Stalin relied on having individuals report their friends and coworkers. To control citizens by spying on them and imprisoning them, Hitler employed the use of the Himmler’s SS and the Gestapo political police. The SS initially started off as Hitler’s personal bodyguards, but under Himmler’s command, they evolved into a more powerful force, who were eventually responsible for the Final Solution. The Gestapo, while somewhat similar to the SS, were Hitler’s secret police, who focused on taking down any opposing political opponents, primarily those who went underground after the creation of the one party system in Germany. The Gestapo were responsible for the capture and imprisonment of most opposing political leaders in Nazi Germany. According to the book on Germany, “Denouncers and…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    General Lon Nol in 1970. To regain political power Prince Sihanouk and his followers joined forces with a communist guerilla organization known as the Khmer Rouge. The new founded alliance then attacked Lon Nol’s army and the civil war within Cambodia began. During this time Cambodia was caught in between two civil wars. In the neighboring country of Vietnam a civil war between the communist north and pro-western south broke out.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pol Pot And Ilse Koch

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pol Pot and Ilse Koch actions on other people are seen as sick and dirty, because of the way they treated people. Pol Pot, right after winning a civil war, would make, “ Former civil servants, doctors, teachers and other professionals were stripped of their possessions and forced to toil in the fields as part of a reeducation process.” Pol Pot’s, “`reeducation process,” would be an example of slavery to a next step. Thousands of people being forced to work on fields, but, if the citizens revolted they were, “ tortured in a detention center, such as the infamous S-21, and then killed.”…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1954 Cambodia became independent, after being ruled by the French. Prince Norodom Sihanouk took power, but a man named Pol Pot did not agree with him, and made his own army to take him out. His army was called the Khmer Rouge (Red Cambodians). However, before he could attack, the U.S. removed the prince from power by a military coup (soldiers who act without know which political actions will be achieved because of their actions), The prince joined forces with Pol Pot to go against the new military Cambodian government. The U.S. then invaded North Vietnamese border camps, which made the North Vietnamese join Khmer Rouge.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Orwell uses Napoleon to talk about Stalin, the Russian dictator. One of the similarities he highlights is manipulation. Napoleon states, "The whole management and organization of this farm depend on us. Day and night we are watching over your welfare" (31; ch. 3). In saying that they will "watch over your welfare", Napoleon ensures that the animals will trust him. He exaggerates the "day and night" part to make them feel reliant on him. Stalin does this as he convinces the people of Russia that their previous leader was far worse than he. Another similarity Orwell uses is forced labor. He says, "[I]n August Napoleon announced that there would be work on Sunday afternoons as well. This work was strictly voluntary, but any animal who absented himself from it would have his rations reduced by half" (54; ch. 6). Napoleon often plays mind games with…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Farm Dbq

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Joseph Stalin was the most ruthless dictator throughout history. The book, Animal Farm written by George Orwell, was an allegory of how Stalin harshly ruled over the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953. Animal farm follows a group of animals who wanted a utopia and while striving for this goal, made a dystopia. When the animals took over the farm, the leaders became the pigs since they were the most intelligent. Overtime a pig named Napoleon took complete control of Animal Farm using various methods of deception. Napoleon stays in charge of Animal Farm by using Animalism, fear and propaganda.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During their quest for power, Napoleon and Qaddafi have many resemblances in their rise to power, laws/policies and cruelties. They are both bloodthirsty dictators who sacrifice many innocent lives for their own personal gain. They tear families apart, and cause the death of many to satisfy their lust for the perfect government. They manage to sway many to their ideas and declare themselves the dictator. After all, a revolution is established out of extreme liberty in order to create a dictatorship.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For one, Napoleon was extremely egotistical. He only cared for himself and was only concerned with how things affected him. The good of everyone else was secondary. Count Mole, who was a Councilor of State, Minister, and peer of France said of Napoleon, “he thought of nothing but his own gratification, of magnifying himself and his power without limit and without rest.” When Napoleon proclaimed to his troops on the Commencement of the war and third Coalition, he stated, “Soldiers, your Emperor is among you!” As you can see from the quotes, Napoleon thought of himself as a Godly being who was better than everyone else and looked down on others. This is one of the reasons I think he is more of a tyrant than a hero.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over time there have been many dictators in the world. Today I will compare and contrast two of them, Fransisco Franco and Benito Mussolini. So let's jump right is with Franco. Franco was a Spanish general who, after the Spanish government began to fail in 1936, took up arms and rebelled against the government. It took him three years, and the help of other famous Fascists such as Hitler and Mussolini, but in 1939, he became the dictator of Spain, or El Caudillo (the leader) as most people referred to him as. Mussolini’s rise to power was a bit different from Franco’s, but it remained relatively the same. In 1919 Mussolini gathered right wing supporters and organized them into the fascist party. Then, Mussolini organized a paramilitary group…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Originally sponsored by Vietnam, Khmer Communist Party was dedicated to the formation of a Cambodian socialist state. The party planned to follow the Maoist approach of initiating widespread revolution through initial insurgent activities in the countryside. By 1960, Khmer Communist Party was moving beyond merely expressing Maoist philosophies; the group was now actively engaging the Cambodian government in battle. Utilizing terrorist tactics, the terrorist group would battle the Cambodian government from 1960 to 1975. During this time, Cambodia's long-time leader Norodom Sihanouk dubbed the guerilla organization the Khmer…

    • 4677 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism In Pol Pot

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pol Pot’s political agenda was largely comprised of Marxist-Leninist philosophies but owes the worst excess of its tyrannical reign to Stalinism. Stalinism is representative of a total authoritarian dictatorship that…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays