Preview

Similarities Between Locke And Hobbes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Locke And Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both played a major part in philosophy during the 17th century. Their ideas set the groundwork for two of the most well-known political systems today. Absolutism, which was based off of the ideas of Hobbes was a political system in which all state/political authority and economic control rested in the hands of a king or queen. In this type of government, the sovereign had complete control of an entire empire and they were not accountable to anybody but God. The ethical belief of absolutism was that certain standards were established against what moral questions could be judged and there was a fine line between right in wrong no matter what the situation was. Locke had very different ideas that established the political system of constitutionalism. Unlike absolutism, constitutionalism established a government where instead of the rulers having total control, their power was limited by a system of laws that they had to obey. Since constitutionalism did not grant all power to the ruler, it allowed the people to have some say in what went on in the government. Locke provided an explanation of his ideas in chapters two and seven of his Two Treaties of Government. These writings by …show more content…
No one had greater power or privileges over each other. Since God created everyone equally it was important for people to protect each other. The only exception was if someone committed a crime that threatened the safety of another person’s freedoms, possessions, or life. Since there were no superiors in a constitutionalist government, everyone had the right to enforce punishments as long as they didn’t exceed the degree of the crime. With its emphasis on freedom, equality and governing based on reason, this chapter is considered one the most important in Locke’s Two Treaties of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With the exception of Athenian democracy and Rome during its republican era, mankind, insofar as them being subject to government control, for most of its history has been constrained and dominated by monarchical rule. This classical form of antagonistic dominion has consisted of the tyranny of self-proclaimed (and therefore illegitimate) sovereigns over a class of subjects. However, this system of power has undergone a fundamental transformation as representative democracies have superseded over monocratic bodies. The magnitude and import of this shift can be regarded as progressive, because it is grounded on the belief that a political institution can sustain an orderly society, while simultaneously preserving the liberties and equalities of individuals. John Locke and Alexis de…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lack of an impartial judge is a defining characteristic of the state of nature, and this lack of a common judge can lead to confusion and violence therefore leading to the state of war. The state of nature and the state of war are not two separate concepts but the state of nature has the fundamental problem and civil government is the solution for the problems of the state of nature.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Locke agrees with Hobbes that the purpose of government is to create order in society but contends that people are reasonable and would cooperate with each other and could rebel if ruler were tyrant. Ruler stays in power only as long as he has consent of those governed. He said people had natural rights, including right to life,…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke shared similarities within their political theories; however their theories also had some major differences. Both men were responding to the crisis of the 17th century and they were highly influenced by the scientific revolution. Hobbes and Locke rejected all previous theories regarding human nature. They used the same methodology, and the men accepted an atomistic view of society. They believed that individuals were rational and were motivated by self-interest. Hobbes and Locke traced their theories from a state of nature to the social contract. They agreed that the legitimacy of the government rested on the consent of the governed. Together, both men rejected legitimate political authorities such as Divine Right of Kings, brute force, historical tradition, and feudal contracts. Both political philosophers offered interesting arguments pertaining to government, human nature, and the state of nature.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke and Hobbes

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    How does the founders' view of power affect the framers' reactions to John Locke? According to Locke, how does man enter the political society and what is the purpose of that society? What obligations does the government have in the civil society? What obligation does the individual have? How do Hobbes and Locke differ? Do you think Americans would agree with Locke? You may read the first paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence to assist you. What evidence do you have to support your view?…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke is an important and influential person in America’s history, from his ideas of separation of powers, social contract theory, and to his Two Treatises of Government, he has helped to make America become better than it was before him. In the Two treatises of government, he showed the importance of personal government and democratic nation, this placed the basic ideas of the Constitution. During his time, the monarchy and the Parliament and church were too powerful. He wanted to separate the powers of each government, so that the state could not disturb the person’s right. John Locke stated that all men are created equal and ideas regarding the first amendment.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    magnesuim

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although absolutism was the preferred form of government, many rulers believed in democracy. Democracy is when the people have a say in what goes on in the government. John Locke, writer of Two Treatises of Government, believed that people were reasonable, moral and that everyone had natural rights from the moment that they were born. “When legislators try to destroy or take away the property of the people, they put themselves into a state of war with the people…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke’s published works, Two Treatise of Government, conveyed his theory that to govern or set up a system of government, the people must first consent to being governed in that way. By consenting, they expect for them, their property, and their rights to be protected. The government, in turn, is responsible for protecting its citizens and looking out for what is best for them. This agreement is unofficial the contract made between the people and their governance for consent to be…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origin of government is traced back to the civilizations existing before centuries—which belonged to ancient Egypt, China, India or Mexico. Apparently, the retrospective governments, such as that of the Chinese empires or of England before the 19th century, had existed in a form called absolute monarchy, in which a king, or a queen, an emperor possesses the utter might of reigning over a nation without the existence of laws limiting his or her authority. In respect of this tyrannical system, corruptions, abuses of powers, brutal penalizations, and acts of seizing rights of citizens were usually treated as an “ordinate;” consequently, being frustrated of the ruthless and heinous kings, a new group of people rose in defiance to such popular dictators as James II, and George III. Among one of the people defying the tawdry monarchs stood John Locke, a famous English activist who were responsible for his famous book The Two Treatises of Government. As regards the democracy nowadays, Locke and his political philosophy have influenced the principles of the United States of…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He argued that all people were born equal with the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. He stated that the reason for government was to protect peoples natural rights. In his book Two Treatises on Government, he described the fairness of law. A quote from his book was “Those who are united into one body, and have a common established law and judicature (court system) to appeal to, with authority to decide controversies between them, and punish offenders, are in civil society one another…” Locke believed if a government failed to protect its citizens natural rights, then they had the right to overthrow it. His beliefs later became a foundation for modern democracy and his ideas inspired later revolutionaries in Europe and the…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Paper

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In The Second Treatise of Government, Locke defines political power as the inalienable birthrights of man, and the need for the formation of a legitimate government. John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government defines a legitimate government in relation to the protection of inalienable rights. He views a valid government as one, which upholds his three main natural laws of life, liberty and property. Locke insists that it is proper to make laws for the regulating and preserving of property, and the execution of such laws, and in the defense of the common-wealth from foreign injury. This is needed for the public good. Locke’s political power is the ability to uphold a constitution. Locke’s reasoning for the creation of a government arises in the need to protect life, liberty and justice. Locke concludes that the reason why men enter into society, is the preservation of their property. The protection of life, liberty and justice then becomes the reason for a new legislative. The value Locke places on property is only furthered in his discussion of the will of the people.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutionalism views government from the opposite side: the government must carry out actions for the betterment of the people. Because of this switching of roles, government’s power is limited to ensure they do not gain too much power over the people. Voltaire wrote, “The best government seems to be that in which all ranks of men are equally protected by the laws.” Unlike Absolutism, in which the rulers are like Gods, the government is equal to regular citizens in the eyes of the law. This limits the government’s power in society. Another limit, described by Montesquieu, is the separation of powers. He wrote, “There can be no liberty where the executive, legislative, and judicial powers are united in one person or body of persons, because such concentration is bound to result in arbitrary despotism.” Limiting the government this way gives liberty to the people, which they do not have under Absolutism, and prevents the government from consolidating power to one person or group, which is the purpose of Absolutism. And if the people believe the government is not representing their interests, according to Locke, they can revolt. He wrote, “When legislators try to destroy or take away the property of the people, or try to reduce them to slavery, they put themselves into a state of war with the people who can then refuse to obey the laws.” Locke believes that government should be limited by the will of the people, as opposed to the people being limited by the will of the…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke main idea was every individual’s equal rights and fairly equal government. Locke believed that the individuals of the same species and rank should be treated equally within one another without subjection or subordination. He says that all men are naturally in “a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature…” he is saying that men have the right to control their own freedom. Locke appears in recommend the legislative and executive branches to the right to create a new government if the old one fails. Locke wrote these words in 1689 and it had an impact in the declaration of independence 8 years later. This shows that John Locke’s ideas had an effect on our government today. (Document A)…

    • 657 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays