Should Torture Be Allowed To Coax A Confession Essay

Torture continues to be a subject of great debate in this country. The question as to whether Torture is an acceptable and justifiable method to coax a confession from a criminal has been brought to the forefront by recent events, such as the September 11th and Boston bombing. Although there are laws established to punish criminals, the criminal must first be found guilt for punishment to be rendered as stated by the U.S constitution. However, using torture to coax a confession is in direct conflict with the rights given to the all people by the constitution, therefore, it should not be practiced to any extend. Torture violates the essence of our democracy by tearing away an individual’s rights and subjective them to cruel punishment, a clear violation of the 8th amendment. Advocated of torture believe that it is a
The Department of Justice denies the use of torture methods but according to the Human Rights Watch, International bodies and U.S courts the FBI uses authorizes tactics such as waterboarding, stress positions, hooding during questioning, deprivation of light and auditory stimuli, and use of detainees’ individual phobias to induce stress to obtain information from Al Qaeda members in captivity. Many current and former US officials still argue that the these “enhanced interrogation techniques “were not torture. However, according to the United Nations Committee against Torture and the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture have clearly stated that these techniques are cruel punishments in violation of the laws of Armed Conflict and International Human Rights laws. What even more concerning is that President Trump has spoken out stating that waterboarding is cruel enough and that it America should push for harsher punishments against