Preview

Should This Student Be Expelled

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
327 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should This Student Be Expelled
Freedom of speech is one of the most fundamental rights that Americans enjoy. It is also one of the most threatened rights, because freedom of speech means the freedom to express one’s discontent with the statues quo and the desire to change it. Some fight to set limits to our freedom of speech, while others fight to defend it. Hentoff is one of those people who fight, via writing, to defend it.
Douglas Hann, a white, junior and a varsity football player at Brown University, was disciplined for alcohol abuse and for racial insults against a black fellow student. Hann was celebrating his 21 birthday party at the courtyard, he was really drunk and shouted into the air “Fuck you, niggers!” referring to a black fellow student and later another student opened the window and called for quiet, and he was answered with a religious insult “Fucking Jew”. Although there was no physical action or any violent fight or threats, but many students were offended by the remarks Hann made. Indeed, Vartan Gregorian, the president of Brown University had to take action, along with the Undergraduate Disciplinary Council and they concluded that Hann had to leave the University forevermore. The president of Brown University, Vartan Gregorian denies that they haven’t expelled anyone for the “excersice of free speech”.
Nat Hentoff, He took his B.A at Northeastern University and attended Harvard University for postgraduate study. He’s a writer of many magazines, journals, and newspaper. He writes a regular column for the village Voice, the New York City weekly and he contributes to the Washington Post, the New Yorker. In one of Hentoff’s article “Should this student have been expelled,” he clearly argues that Douglas Hann should have not been expelled from Brown University, regardless Hann’s drunken incidents and hateful speech. Hentoff feels that “hate speech” codes, such as the one at Browm University, violate the first amendment that guarantees freedom of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tyler Chase Harper, a high school sophomore, was sent to the principal’s office for violating the dress code. He was wearing a T-shirt which contained statements that disparaged the homosexual community. Chase filed suit in federal court claiming that the school violated his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion, as well as rights protected by the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses under the federal Constitution and the California Civil Code.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josh Renville, an 18 year old student attending Fargo North High School has petitioned against the school in question for violating his first amendment right to freedom of speech. The school prohibited Renville from using a photograph in which he his holding his favorite rifle for his senior portrait in the yearbook. Renville claims that by prohibiting the photograph, the school is infringing on his rights to freedom of symbolic speech. Despite Renville’s claims, the actions taken by the administrators at Fargo North High were completely constitutional. Fargo North was acting well within their constitutional limits to promote the ideals of public education, to properly monitor any media that would have been associated with the school, and to limit any action that inherently interfered with the school’s disciplinary…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There often comes a time in all of our lives when we must each realize that our actions can severely hinder the lives of others. Whether our actions are intentional or unintentional has no relevance, as it is imperative that we sustain the common bond that tie us together as people and dispels any subversive efforts that aim at creating racial barriers. Having been adequately briefed about the event that occurred on campus, I have decided to elucidate how this type of unbecoming behavior completely goes against our moral code and our obligation to treat each other with respect and dignity. First, it is my belief that this type of behavior only contributes to further legitimizing the concept of race and thus, begins to forge social stereotypes that not only marginalize individuals but also makes them susceptible to other discriminatory practices.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    College students that belong to the majority group usually aren’t fond of being told that their unintentional actions mean they’re actually a racist. Conversely, those who support these checks on language grow more angry, discouraged that their majority counterparts cannot agree with strict rules on communication. Whenever something offensive is spoken, students adopt a victimized sense of self, creating a tirade of upheaval. Rather than developing mob mentality, calling for major change, peaceful discussion should instead be…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of speech is one of the most fundamental rights that Americans enjoy. It is also one of the most threatened rights, because freedom of speech means the freedom to express one’s discontent with the statues quo and the desire to change it. Some fight to set limits to our freedom of speech, while others fight to defend it. Hentoff is one of those people who fight, via writing, to defend it.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bret Weinstein, an Evergreen professor was harassed and called racist for refusing to leave campus during the clearly racist “Day of Absence”, propagated by Black Lives Matter. He was “cornered by students” who shouted that he was a racist, while other students patrolled the hallways wearing masks and carrying weapons. Weinstein fled the school for “literal fear of his safety”. (The College Fix). This mentality is scarily similar to the one shared by Ras the Exhorter.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mizzou Free Speech

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article, Mizzou, Yale, and Free Speech, Nicholas Krsitof discusses today’s most sensitive issue: racism. His audience is the people of the United States so he is sure to pull out all of the most controversial issues. He carefully tip-toes around the subject of racism when he shifts the focus from racism and points his readers towards accepting all forms of diversity. He incorporates the need for acceptance of diversity and the increasing cry for the first amendment, also known as, freedom of speech. He attempts to cover every perspective in his article when he goes from the point of view of a liberal, a Christian, and even a transgender person. He argues that there is diversity so that we can challenge each other and in the words of Kristof, “Education is about stretching muscles.”…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herbeck, Tedford (2007). Boston College: Freedom of Speech in the United States (fifth edition) Zacchini vs. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company 433 U.S. 562 Retrieved on March 2, 2008 from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/zacchini.html…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Campus Analysis

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loyal Torch followers will remember that back in 2010, Audaer, a law student at Syracuse's College of Law, was subjected to a prolonged and wrongheaded disciplinary investigation for allegedly running an anonymous satirical blog about life in law school. In the style of The Onion, the blog attributed obviously fake quotes to students, faculty, and staff at the College of Law and generally made fun of life in law school. Even though the blog included a disclaimer making clear that "No actual news stories appear on the site," the College of Law threatened Audaer with harassment charges for more than three months, and, making matters worse, refused to reveal the identity of his accusers or what expression in particular had justified the charges. When Audaer and his attorney attempted to receive information from Syracuse about the charges, the law school brazenly demanded that they sign a gag order that would have effectively prevented any media from reporting on the case using this information and effectively prevented Audaer from interviewing witnesses. For allegedly engaging in purely protected speech, Audaer was even threatened with…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article titled, “Colleges Should Censor Racist Hate Speech,” (Virginia Law Review, March 1990) Daryl Brown concludes that colleges should censor hate speech on campus and the prominence of blatant and subtle racism on campus will require a two prong…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A highly well-known right given to American’s is the freedom of speech which stems from the first amendment. This prohibits the government from creating any laws that could stop the people from exercising their feelings, or speaking their thoughts. American’s deserve the right to share their opinions as well as criticize our government. The first amendment is often seen as our most important right as American’s. In some countries, citizens are not allowed to criticize or question their government without the fear of being imprisoned. This right is important because it gives American’s the opportunity to give their own personal ideas and inventions regarding the government which creates the existence of multiple points of view. In turn, this initiates a productive and constructive society with a…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What would you do if a swastika was hung outside your dorm room or building by another student? How would you react to any offensive object or behavior that was considered free speech of another person? Many people do not know what they would do or how they would react and handle the situation if they found themselves in it. In the essay, “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus,” author Derek Bok gives insight on the same situation which becomes a major concern at Harvard University, involving some students. Freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment which allows many actions and personal expressions to be valid and legal. Freedom of speech should be allowed on college campuses as long as it does not cause danger of personal threats to anyone.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays