Preview

Should There Be A Punishment For The Use Of Free Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
753 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should There Be A Punishment For The Use Of Free Speech
Imagine you're one of the most loved person in your town because you act yourself, make friends with everyone, and go around and try to help people that are in need. Then one day someone started spreading lies about you which made people starting to avoid you. How would that make you feel? Should there be a punishment for the use of some people using free speech a little too far? I, myself, believe that there should be a punishment for the negative use of free speech. To many people take advantage of First Amendment which is Freedom of Speech. To much hate speech, spreading of false accusation, and all sorts of rumors that can lead people to have suicidal intentions. When does free speech end and hate speech start? What do you think of the topic of hate speech? Well lets see why the reason why people aren’t getting in trouble …show more content…
My belief is yes I do think there should be a limitation on Freedom of Speech. Especially with what happened to me and what I have seen what it has done to people when someone spreads lies about me. But others would not agree because the ones who would decide would be the government and they might not be very fair and would be bias with what they think is hostile. “They are almost certainly wrong. The truth is that when the government gets to decide which speech is permissible, its exercise of that authority is almost always driven by political considerations, not principled distinctions. And those who proposed the restrictions often come to regret it.”(PBS) People nowadays don’t like how much the government controls our life. That’s why some people don’t come out and say anything about people going after them and just result to suicide because government really doesn’t help at all maybe just a little. But the limitation is a hard to decide because where does free speech end and where does hostile and hate speech start. With talking about suicide. Do you know why people commit suicide

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intent of the Framers

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Freedom of speech is part of the first amendment which states, “You are free to say almost anything except that which is obscene, slanders another person, or has a high probability of inciting others to take imminent lawless action.” (Patterson, 2008, p. 98) With the freedom of speech it is necessary to put certain restraints into place. The government cannot restrict what people say unless there is a clear and present danger to other people from the voicing of the statement. The freedom of speech was originally intended to give people the right to voice their opinion without being taken to court for it as long as it did not hurt anyone. Currently freedom of speech is viewed as a way to allow people the chance to speak for themselves. By allowing this government is allowing people to have a say in their governance and not ruled by the government without their input. This allows us to have a say in our government and what is represented by us. In 1927, Fiske vs. Kansas was a case that helped to invalidate state laws that restricted expression. The events that changed freedom of speech over the years are the burning of the flag court case, the “pentagon paper” publishing, and other such events throughout the years.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American Citizens our freedom of speech is protected by the Constitution’s first Amendment which “guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition…” (Cornell Law 2017), but that doesn’t or shouldn’t give anyone the right to cause harm or violence against another person or group of people if we do not agree or share the same beliefs. The laws were created to protect us, but many people interpret the laws differently and therefore, feel entitled to speak freely even if it causes…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, is there such thing as too much freedom of speech? On one hand we get to vocalize and become more unified as a country. Then on the other hand we could push it so far that we could destroy the country. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law,” but should we (Bond and Smith, Pg.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guarantees our freedom of expression, as it is written in the constitution, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their statements; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” This clause is the based foundation of the articles: “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” by Ronald Eissens, and “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Not Be Regulated” by Sandy Starr, in which both authors reveled their opinions and standing on this issue by using different styles and presenting their ideas in different ways.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether it's through the internet or verbally conflicts occur and can end up in physical violence. People believe hate speech should be censored and prohibited from the 1st amendment. They believe that not everything you say should be protected by the first amendment. Advocates are concerned about the increase of incidents , threats , and potential hate crimes. With the first amendment being as lenient as it is on what we can say a lot of hate speech is…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate speeches has its very negative background and with it come hateful groups and very heinous actions. Nothing good has come from hate speech and it has only been destructive towards the youth and the laws that hate speech hides under shouldn’t be the only reason that these people should be able to use this type of speech. Hate speech causes underlying issues and shouldn’t be popularized or made for as a joke. Hate speech encourages negativity between races,religions,political views, and sexual orientation. Hate speech should banned just like everything else in this world that is no good for anyone.The destructive behaviors that are imitated by children who already use such behavior and they become homophobes and xenophobes.Hate speech should have never existed and therefore needs to be erased as soon as…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Freedom of speech issues are constantly in the media today. There are plenty of incidents where people’s constitutional rights were met with great and unnecessary force. The First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America guarantees the freedoms of speech, religion, assembly, press, and the right to petition the government. These freedoms are impeded when their freedoms are met with retort. When free speech is not allowed in the public sector, honesty is no longer accepted. This, in turn, sets the precedent of honesty as being looked down upon and considered rude. Why should someone’s opinions be punished because they don’t go along with what is standard or declared acceptable by others. By infringing on the freedom of someone’s speech, it is the same as punishing them for being who they are. Freedom of speech should not be obstructed or met with retort by the…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allowing people to speak freely is easy when what they say is not offensive. Being free to say things that offend or insult other groups of people may be necessary to challenge those in power or to identify problems within society. I am sure some would argue that hate speech serves no purpose but to offend and divide. To that argument, I would quickly point out that we should not be afraid of what people say, write, or think. You don't fight ideas by attempting to silence them. You fight them with better ideas. Also, who decides what is offensive? For example, if someone said, “I'm sick of Black people killing each other in Chicago”, some would find that offensive, but is that hate speech? We can easily say no, but it would not be our decision. Once a law is in place, those in charge decide how it is implemented. This is the other problem with limiting free speech, those in power would set and interpret the law. History is littered with examples of people gaining power then using that power to silence their…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people take advantage of the freedom of speech.According to the observer it states that “these same people would claim that the right of freedom of speech has a limit that ends once a speaker’s words turn offensive or derogatory”.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Hate Speech

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prior to the 1930’s speech was not as protected as it is today (Bell, 968). This is a freedom that many take for granted or spend very little time thinking about. While it would be easy to say that banning hate speech would clearly take away the freedom of speech, the truth is banning hate speech would actually provide opportunities for more people to enjoy free speech. According to Bell’s article in the Indiana Law Journal, minorities who are subjected to hate speech are more likely to avoid those situations whether it involves their place of work, home or public environment (966). They are not engaging in discussion like opponents of banning hate speech suggest, there is a clear understanding that this situation is not safe and must be avoided. While some would contend that hate speech is simply, spoken words that some find offensive, Stephen Newman, in Liberty, Community and Censorship, describes hate speech as words that heighten prejudice, and intimidate specific people (375). Even the Supreme Court does not always agree on the defining lines of hate speech. Erik Bleich in his article the Rise of Hate Speech lists several court cases that have helped to define the law in regards to hate speech. These cases include Chaplinsky V. New Hampshire, which introduced the term “fighting words”, Biauharnais V. Illinois, this case involved printed materials, and the case quoted in every article RAV v. City of…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do Words Matter?

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Words are very powerful, and sometimes the words we use offend people. Freedom of speech is highly valued but what happens when your freedom becomes hurtful or disrespectful to someone else? There are so many different kinds of people and different things that offend each person. In this day where we are more inclined to say whatever we want, we see more and more offense being taken to the words that get said. It's hard to understand why certain words can be insulting to someone when it may not seem that way to you. We have to ask ourselves, why do we care what other people say and should we censer everything that goes into the public just so people don't get offended?…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate Speech Policy

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995, the number of hate sites has increased from one to many. “Today, Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Anti-Defamation League have documented about 2,800 hate sites,” and growing (Leet, 288). Since globalization took place in our world, the internet has become a place where anyone is able to expose all sorts of information to the billions of eyes of the public. Globalization has it’s positive effects and also, increasingly, it’s negative; Hate speech on cyberhate sites is one of them. The United States is one of the most diverse countries in the world. There is however still a notion that the white people are the ‘superior race’. Racial discrimination is still very much alive in our world…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate Groups

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As stated in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, free speech is where, “Congress shall make no law …abridging the freedom of speech …or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Legal Information Institute [LIT], n.d.-f). Despite the brevity, the one sentence that is the First Amendment has proven to be a vague clause that has arbitrarily seen the freedom of hate speech and the persecution of free speech. As pointed out by Tsesis (2016), the First Amendment merely acknowledges the importance of the freedom of speech and of its existence in the United States, but does not define what free speech actually is (p. 1021). The importance of specifying that only “Congress shall make no law” implies that it is the duty of the Supreme Court to determine what is allowed under free speech, as the Constitution was meant to be a be a “living document” to be added on to as the United States changed over time (United States Courts [USC], n.d.-a). However, this poses a problem, as since there have been two and a half centuries of cases decided by the Supreme Court, many people outside of the criminal justice system are dangerously unaware of what exactly their freedom of speech entitles them to. This applies even more so to hate groups, whose…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson one of the founding fathers once said, “A democracy cannot be both ignorant and free.” The first amendment structured to give United States citizens the right to speak freely is an essential law that builds the foundation of the United States Constitution. The first amendment is one of the most controversial laws that higher instructions of learning, churches, state, and local governments have debated for several centuries. So the question is should the United States government place a measure to regulate people from hateful language? When a rap artist writes music to degrade women and display expletive lyrics that warrants a disclaimer for underage children listening to their music should the government stop the rap artist from expressing their genre of music? Most people would agree that hate speech is an abnormal behavior, which warrants some form of punishment to individuals in involved in hate speech. However, some people in society may have a different definition of hate speech, then the next person. In addition, some may even believe that because there is a first amendment that all speech should be permissible.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays