Preview

Should The United States Government Monitor The Internet?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
799 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The United States Government Monitor The Internet?
"People use the internet as a database for their most private information. A large number of citizens use digital banking, complete their taxes on the internet, and may even upload private family information for various reasons. Although the internet is regularly used as a means of sharing with friends and family, as well as a more efficient way to perform daily activities, it is commonly perceived as unsafe. Many people realize that access to the internet can result in many different consequences. The majority of internet users are aware that the internet can be, and rather often is used for illegal or immoral activities such as cyberbullying and hacking. Because of increased illegal activity online, there has been controversy over net neutrality …show more content…
This question gives rise to the controversy over network neutrality, the government instated action that gave equal rules and policies for internet companies. In 2015, the Federal Communications Commission put in place a policy that banned internet servers from manipulating information that is sent through data or the internet. This manipulation could occur in many ways; for example, an internet company could manipulate the connection to be slower for a specific company because their competitor pays for a faster rate. This policy was largely put in place to protect consumers from being forced toward a lobbying company.
However, in 2017 this policy was done away with by the new Federal Communications Commission. The government was wrong in removing the policies involved in net neutrality. It is unfair in a free market and democratic country for a consumer to suffer, because of something they have no hand in. Internet servers should provide a service that moves information quickly and efficiently from one point to the next without any manipulation or analysis being
…show more content…
The boy continued to appeal his case until he reached North Carolina's Supreme Court, which ruled that this law violates the first amendment. The court ruled that the law regulates speech instead of actions, making his abusive use of social media a violation of the first amendment. Currently, it is difficult to define this abuse and sentence one for it, but it needs to be considered one of the most important things in our government. Many adolescents have committed suicide or had to receive medical attention, through therapy and hospitalization, because of this vile act. Bullying is an unacceptable act whether it be face-to-face or through social

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jrlc Chapter 2 Pt. 1

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that eventually some form of net neutrality will have to be put in place to prevent censorship or any restrictions of content based on person-to-person or amount of money being paid for service.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality Rules

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As of December when I wrote this research paper the battle of Net Neutrality is still on going. Several lobbyist are still trying to kill Net Neutrality. Several providers are suing the FCC for reclassifying them under Title II. The future of Net Neutrality is still in question and at any time the rules can be changed or be taken…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Abolishing Net Neutrality Was a Bad Idea With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    But, what the FCC isn’t taking into account is the millions of internet users that want to keep internet neutrality. With net neutrality maintained, users of the internet will have equal access to the internet, which will increase their total…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet should be treated equally (Schewick, 2009). This means that ISP’s cannot discriminate against content by slowing down content they do not agree with or charging internet companies more to have certain content delivered faster (Schewick, 2009). Net neutrality has been the unspoken standard since the creation of the internet. This is because, when the internet was first created, ISP’s did not have the technology to determine which content was going through their network (Schewick, 2009). Since then, technology has improved and ISP’s now have the ability to determine which content is going through their network and effect its delivery to the end user (Schewick, 2009).…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whether we accomplish this by turning ISPs into common carriers or by enforcing a standard non-discrimination rule with the internet, there has to be a zero tolerance for throttling of websites based off of extra fees charged by the customer-side internet provider. No matter what they may try to claim, the main reason the corporations that own our nation’s ISPs are fighting against net neutrality is because they want to make more money. If America backs down on this issue, the internet as we know it will be lost. As Nilay Patel said, “What happens now is entirely dependent on whether the FCC’s new chairman, Tom Wheeler, has the courage to stand up and finally say the right words — that broadband access is a telecommunications service that should be regulated just like landline phones.”Works…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killswitch Documentary

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parker, Clifton B. "Greater Regulation Not Necessary for Internet, Stanford Scholar Says." Stanford News. N.p., 08 Apr. 2016. Web. 13 Feb. 2017.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The government should continue regulations and keep control over net neutrality. Net Neutrality greatly benefits the people of the internet. The current regulations allow people to be free online. They are able to express their opinions and feelings with a free, uncensored internet. With net neutrality, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are not allowed to censor and control what people see on the internet, meaning that manipulation and bias is not possible on the internet.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Net neutrality has become threatened as in April 2010 the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, could not force ISPs to give equal treatment to all internet traffic passing over their networks. In December 2010, the FCC came up with a solution that ISPs can regulate usage based on whether the internet service provided was wired or wireless. For fixed broadband networks, ISPs cannot block any lawful content, services, or applications. Wireless providers, may not block any web sites, however they are allowed to block applications and services. Considering these new guidelines the author suggested that net neutrality was now net semi-neutrality.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet is being regulated more and more by governments, but is it a good thing?…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays