Preview

Should The French Government Undertake Military Action?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1010 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The French Government Undertake Military Action?
The following paper is intended at establishing whether the French president may undertake military action, along with establishing to what extent involvement from the parliament is necessary in such scenarios. The paper will focus on the constitutional aspects of the question and will therefore refer to the French Constitution along with other relevant legal materials and customs.
This will be done in the following manner: Firstly, the main characteristics of the French President, the Parliament and the semi-presidential system will be reviewed. Secondly, relevant articles of the French Constitution will be considered in order to identify the competences that military action require in France. Thirdly, the precise procedure that must be undertaken and the organs of the state that are involved in
…show more content…
This means that the President of the Republic, the executive head of state , and a Prime Minister, the head of government appointed by the President who is accountable to parliament, work together to direct the government while the President is particularly influential in matters that concern foreign policy or national security. The Prime Minister’s main role is to bring bills in front of the National assembly , who will decide whether a bill may be passed or not. His other functions may be merely to accomplish the will of the President if he comes from the same political party. If he comes from a different political party, then his role is closer to other European Prime Ministers, meaning that he is more independent and must achieve compromises with the President.
The French Parliament has a bicameral structure, and is composed of a Senate, an indirectly elected upper chamber, and a National Assembly, an elected lower chamber. The Parliament exercises legislative and financial powers. It also has the powers to restrict the powers of the government and the competence to amend the constitution

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of Prime Minister has been constantly evolving over the years, and it can be argued that the degree of power he/she wields changes with it. For example, during the late 17th century, a Chief Minister existed as a special advisor to the monarch. However by the late 19th century, the Prime Minister is the leader of the largest party of House of Commons and enjoys greater political power, whereas the monarch acts as Head of State.…

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1793, France was at war with it’s surrounding countries; Austria, Prussia, Sardinia, Great Britain, and the United Netherlands. France turned to America for support because in America’s time of need, during The American Revolution, France aided America. France thought it was time for America to repay them. In response, the US drafted the Proclamation of Neutrality which said that they would not be taking any side in the war. Although some may say that America was obligated to aid France, America made the right decision to stay neutral, since America was vulnerable lacking a strong army, and they had no legal obligation to take action.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Foreign Secretary describes a meeting he has had with the French, Belgian and Italian governments (FO 371/19892)…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2004 Haitian

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On February 2004, the violent coup Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide from office was orchestrated by military force. This paper wants to identify and describe the reasons for this Haitian revolt. There are many interpretations and concerning this event; therefore, I want to assess different perspectives about the ousting of President Aristide. Finally, this paper will discuss the positive and negative results from this 2004 Haitian coup d’état.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [3] Julian Jackson, France: The Dark Years 1940-1944,(New York: Oxford University Press, 2001) p. 168.…

    • 2547 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dreyfus affair shook France, and Europe, greatly affected French politics and jeopardized France’s future. The significance of the affair on French politics from 1894-1906 was to be colossal. The affair triggered many movements that were dormant and waiting for such commotion to appear. With hindsight we can deduce that the Dreyfus affair was not the start of a political battle but an event that precipitated the final battle where the fate of the French republic would be decided. During this investigation we will be analyzing the various affects the Dreyfus Affair had upon politics in France, from the years 1894 to 1906. To present an elaborate and in-depth analysis of the question posed, primary and secondary sources will be used, including French and English sources. I have chosen to investigate the Dreyfus Affair as I have noticed that its importance is beginning to fall into oblivion. The French population has now almost forgotten how different their lives would be if the Dreyfus Affair had taken a different turn. Reducing the importance of the affair has gradually occurred due to authors that have only briefly overlooked it in French history schoolbooks.1 Thus, in total defiance to these inaccurate and neglectful historians, I have set out to prove that this affair was not minor, not insignificant and that it was a colossal event that shaped French politics of the 20th century. Even today, it is possible to perceive how the Dreyfus Affair acted upon politics in the later parts of the 20th century. We can see how the French collaboration with Nazi Germany during Vichy France was directly related to the Dreyfus Affair. This collaboration was the revenge of the nationalist right-wing elements that had failed to overthrow the government. An even more pertinent example of the continuing repercussions of Dreyfus Affair was the dishonourable discharge of Colonel Paul Gaujeac (head of French military archives) in February 1994 after submitting a…

    • 3917 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We admire the French peoples attempt to create their own republic but in wake of the Reign of Terror we question the liberty of their efforts. We believe they have gone too far and fear they may destroy our experiment. As the French begin a war against Great Britain we strongly support diplomatic harmony with Great Britain. We support the ratification of Jay’s Treaty. The treaty will help us solve the outstanding issues between our two countries since American independence. It will bring about order and stability by promoting commerce and investment in America. England has stood a strong example of constitutional order as opposed to the radicalism of the French Revolution.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PM limited by European Constitution which defeats Parliamentary Sovereignty. Limited by scrutiny of Parliament (apparently).…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay will examine the ideologies of the French revolution of 1789. Two perspectives on the French revolution were held by the conservatives’ elite and the educated philosophers. The educated philosophers believed that a revolution was the only way that the middle and lower class were to have a say in matters of state, and obtain their rights. Their goal in the revolution was to turn the absolute monarchy into a constitutional monarchy. The conservatives believed that the absolute monarchy should stay intact to preserve their heritage, and that the revolutionary changes brought more problems than they solved.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    War of 1812 Causes

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Document 1: This excerpt is from a report from the Committee on Foreign Relations of the U.S. House of Representatives on our nation 's growing conflict with France and Great Britain…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common European Army

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The UK and France have been willing to follow the USA’s example of military force and shown support for the idea of an EU army. Other nations have clearly rejected this approach on the basis of pacifist arguments and because they are reluctant to commit to the high level of military spending this would imply. While the EU does like to see itself as the diplomat of the world and flaunt its achievements with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), it still ponders the possibility of a middle-of-the-road strategy of militarization and securitization. There is no necessity as regards the creation of European Union Army because member states already cooperate sufficiently with each other.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From the very beginning of history, the military intervention in the state making affairs has been very common phenomenon, not only in Pakistan, but also in many other countries of the world, military is considered very important element in the function of a country.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the 1993 charter presidential powers, enumerated in art. 46, included determining the structure of the government, the appointment and dismissal of the prime minister (and the government), veto powers, decree powers, the right to initiate referenda. The government was considered the ‘supreme body of executive power’ (art. 70), but its work was ‘monitored’ by the president (art. 72) who could also preside its meetings, endowing him with agenda-setting powers. Government appointment, oversight, and dismissal combined with legislative initiative (art. 64) were far from insignificant powers (as the scores in Table 7.4a, b indicate), but the president was confronted with a parliament endowed with the right to ‘determine the directions of domestic and foreign policy’ (art. 58.4). Members of parliament also had the right to initiate legislation, something which the constitution also granted to the government, the Supreme Court, and ordinary citizens…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays