Top-Rated Free Essay

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places.

Good Essays
I remember that when I was child, I saw one public service announcement in the television that was performed by Yul Brynner, who was an actor of "The King and I". In an announcement, he said, "If I hadn't had smoking the cigarette, I would not have talked to you smoking was hazardous the health". An announcement was played after he had died in lung cancer, which was caused by smoking. This announcement gave me deeply impression that cigarette was harmful our health absolutely. However, how many people agree this? Everyday, we hear much news about the people who die from the cancer, which is caused by smoking or passive smoke. It is obvious that smoking not only affects the health of smokers, but also harms other people who are not smoking. So, many people think government should ban the smoking in public place. However, this issue always provides a lot of controversy. Some people say "Yes", some people say "No". Now, we are going to examine what opinion the people have in this issue.

Some people think smoking should be banned because it can develop lung cancer. Cigarette contains thousands of different organic chemicals. When people who are smoking, the body will absorb a mass of tars, which is harmful the lung. Besides, the nicotine and carbon monoxide, which damage the normal cells of the lung when these chemicals are burnt. The article says over 4,000 varied chemicals, which can cause cancer, include in the cigarette. According to the evaluation, it has about 164,100 conditions are involved by lung cancer and 156,900 people die of lung cancer in the United States in 2000. ("Facts About Lung Cancer", 2001)

Passive smoke is another reason for the people who support for banning smoking in public places. Smoking not only affects smokers but also threatens the life of non-smokers. Passive smoke is created by the flaming and smoking of tobacco products, which contain many carcinogens chemicals, such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide. Non-smokers inhale these chemicals through the air thereby increasing the risk of lung cancer. Besides, many diseases that come from active smoke also affect to the non-smokers. Nasal sinus cancers and the death rate of heart disease are also caused by the passive smoke, which exposes to the air. According to the EPA evaluation, about 3,000 people who are killed by lung cancer, which is developed by passive smoke. Moreover, passive smoke also affects 35,000 to 40,000 non-smokers to develop the heart disease. (Karpilovsky 3)

On the other hand, some businessmen think smoking should not be banned due to their businesses will be affected by the smoking ban. When the smoking is banned, all restaurants or places of entertainment will loss many customers who are smoker. Because the smoker cannot enjoy the smoking when they are patronizing at the restaurant. In the article, the statement of restaurant revenue implies that the income of restaurant for this year is less 0.6 percent than the identical period of previous year. Zeidan Zeidan, owner of Z's Deil mentions his revenue has reduced 20 percent due to the banning of smoking. "We used to get very good business from smokers in here during lunch and breakfast, but now they don't like it because it's so closed in", Zeidan Zeidan commented. (qtd. in Passi 1-2)

Besides, the right of individual would be exploited by the smoking ban. Some people think they have a right to choose whether or not to smoke. Everyone has right and freedom. If the government bans the smoking in public places, means that government deprives the right of the people who are smoker. Allanah, who is a non-smoker, thinks smoking in public area should not be prohibited because smokers should have a right and freedom, such as walking on the street or anywhere same as other people. However, if the smokers who are told smoking is prohibited in public places, they will be exploited the right with smoking. He also says he does not favor the odor of smoking and to be surrounded by the people who are smoking, but he thinks everyone should have a right. If other people who cannot endure, they can select staying out of those areas. (Allanah 4)

From my point of view, smoking should be banned in public places. Firstly, smoking gets a fire easily. Many people who like throwing the cigarette butt that does not go out near the tree. When the tree is burnt out by that cigarette butt, it probably causes the disaster that we cannot estimate. I have heard many conflagrations that are caused by the cigarette butt that does not go out. Secondly, smoking is not good for the environment. When the cigarette is burnt, it will produce much carbon monoxide. When it combines with ozone, which is produced by a chemical reaction in the air between pollution and sunlight, and other chemical, such as nitrogen dioxide and so. It will produce much poisoned gas, which affects environment seriously. In fact, smoking not only kills the smoker, hazards innocent non-smokers, but also ruins the natural ecosystem and environment. Therefore, it is no doubt that smoking should be banned in public places in order to protect all people and environment.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    TOPIC: SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES ATTITUDE: Smoking is dirty, Smoking leaves ashes, matches and butts on the ground, Smoking bothers other people, Smoking is dangerous, People cough and hate the smell, Smoking is bad for your health, Smoking is a bad influence on young people, Careless smokers can cause building and forest fires, Smoking kills and damages the organs. Purpose: To information Thesis: Smoking should be banned from public places Audience: 1. My audience are very aware of…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking Should Be Banned In Public Places In my opinion, smoking in public places should be prohibited. There are many reasons that support this point of view. Smoking is one of the leading killers in world. People shouldn't die because of it. For years people have been smoking in public thinking 'it's my body, I can do whatever I want to it,' but now that it has been proven that smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those around him or her, they should not be allowed to smoke…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places Have you ever been out in public, and you inhaled a cloud of smoke from someone smoking? Smoking in public places should be banned; it not just only harms you as the smoker but also the people around you when you light up a cigarette. It is called Second- hand smoke. Second-hand smoke comes in two ways; side stream and mainstream. Many people may say that smoking should not be banned because it is a free country and that person can walk away or move. But…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking in Public Places Should be banned Argumentative Justin Brennan I think smoking in public places needs to be banned. As a citizen I feel that my family and I should be able to have a choice whether we want to be around cigarette smoke or not. The laws on smoking in public areas are getting much better, but we still need to make more changes. There is no smoking in places like restaurants, bus stops, and some buildings and parks, but not all the laws get enforced as well as they could…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking is a bad habit, and it is not good for human health. It makes people who do not smoke are unhealthy and feel annoyed. Therefore, I think the smoking should be banned in public places such as hospitals, post offices and airports. First, smoking is harmful to people’s health. Smokers want to smoke wherever they want, and they do not care about people surrounding. This reason makes non-smokers get lung and respiratory diseases. For example, children inhale smoke for a long time, they will…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    who smoke have increase over the years. Although they are equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking can be, people still choose to smoke. It is a personal choice and a highly addictive habit. Smokers choose to subject themselves to the health risks of smoking. It is not for the government or any third party to dictate whether or not a person should be allowed to smoke. However, smoking does not only affect the smoker negatively. It also affects all the people around those who smoke because…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Smoking Should Be Banned In Public Places Smoking is currently under siege as never before with a spate of high profile health injuries cases. Cigarette smoke, a dangerous chemical, consists of both active smoke and passive smoke, through which people may inhale. Non-smokers meet smokers in many public places like restaurants, railway stations, buses, offices, etc. Both active smokers and passive smokers are equally affected. Based on two realistic factors including the health affection and…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Passive smoking is the inhaling of second hand smoke. It is damaging the lungs of thousands of innocent Australians every year. All because some people are addicted and protest that it there right to smoke and endanger fellow workmates in public places. Banns are currently in discussion to finally protect workplace employees from passive smoking. Just think of the stench that embeds your clothing when you exit a nightclub or restaurant. With smoking banns in place, venues like these and many others…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you mind people smoking around you in public places? According to the pro-smoking group Air Initiative 7 in 10 of you do. Do you think it is fair to discriminate against smokers, forcing them to stand outside and smoke? On the other hand is it fair that non-smokers should have to inhale second hand smoke which can dame their health? (Do you support this ban or do you oppose it?) Personally I oppose it as I believe that non-smokers shouldn't be subjected to a smoky environment on a night out. I…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay on Should Smoking be banned in Public Places ? MANISH RAJKOOMAR ESSAY Many surveys, studies and scientific research has proved that smoking is injurious to health. Smoke is unhealthy and suffocating. It pollutes the environment. There are two types of smokers - active and passive. The person who smokes is active and other who are near to him and inhale the smoke are passive smokers. Both are equally affected by the ill effects of smoking. Smokers and non-smokers meet at many places like offices…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays