Preview

Should Schools Be Allowed To Search Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1173 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Schools Be Allowed To Search Essay
In 1984, fourteen year old T.L.O ( her full name was never disclosed due to her age ) was called down to the principal’s office after she was discovered smoking in the girl’s bathroom. T.L.O’s purse was searched and school administrators found cigarettes, one dollar bills, a small amount of marijuana, and other items. T.L.O had stated that she had not been smoking, however, her friend admitted to doing so. After being taken to the police station, T.L.O admitted to selling marijuana at school and smoking in the bathroom. It’s cases like this that emphasize why it’s so important to grant school administrators the right to search its students with reasonable suspicion and probable cause. The most common items that are searched through at schools are lockers, cell phones, bookbags, and the occasional body search. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” However, when a student is on school grounds, schools can use “reasonable suspicion” and aren’t required to present a warrant to search a student. …show more content…
Savana’s mother sued the school district and took her case to district court. The district court determined that Savana’s Fourth Amendment rights had not been violated. Savana then took her case to the supreme court where it was concluded that Savana’s Fourth Amendment rights had been violated. The court voted 8-1, in favor of Savana. However, the court also stated that the school administrators were entitled to qualified immunity. This was because at the time of the search, Savana’s unconstitutionality was not expressed. It's cases like Savana’s that show the ugly side of school searches if not properly executed. However, if properly done, school searches can be a positive impact on a school and its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In school, student's Fourth Amendment rights are limited. Teachers and school administrators are legally allowed to search students without a warrant. Student's basic rights are being violated and it shouldn't be legal. Their rights shouldn't be limited because it invades student's privacy. Also, these searches could be unreasonable and suspicion less. These students can be searched without a warrant. People in school shouldn't have their rights limited and violated just because of suspicious teachers. This limitation of students' rights is unconstitutional.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Safford Arizona school on October 8th, officials strip-searched a 13-year-old girl after they received information from another student that the girl possessed "prescription strength" 400 mg ibuprofen and 200mg naproxen. While attending math, assistant principle Kerry Wilson entered the classroom and instructed Savanna Redding's to his office. Upon entering, she immediately noticed her planner placed on his desk. However, what she didn't recognize was the knife, cigarette and lighter that was contained inside it. Admitting the planner was hers, she explained to the assistant principle that she had lent the planner prior to her classmate, Marissa and had NO knowledge of what was inside it. Also brought to her attention was a large white bottle of ibuprofen that was also found in the planner. Unsatisfied, the assistant principle asked to also search the rest of her belongings in order to disprove her claim. When no evidence was found, he proceeded to send her to the school's nurses office for what can be considered a strip-search. She was told to remove a clothing and in the processes her private areas (breast) were exposed. Complete embarrassed, she remained calm and did as she was told. No pills, or any other illegal item was found on her. Naturally, when Savanna 's mom discovered this she "dropped the bomb" and filed a lawsuit saying it violated her daughter's fourth amendment right (which was the right thing to do)and that she was never contacted during the search at anytime. Proceeding to the trial, the District court found no violation and a panel agreed, but on the appeal in a "en banc decision 6-5" the court reversed the other decision saying that it DID in fact violate her fourth amendment right. School district appealed to the Supreme Court and approved there appeal and granted certiorari. It was reasoned that the strip search was not justified nor was the scope of intrusion reasonably…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Issue before the court was that two high school sophomores Lindsay Earls and Daniel James along with their families challenged their schools drug testing policy as an unlawful search that violated student’s right to privacy. They alleged that their policy requiring students to consent to random urinalysis testing for drug use violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case brings the question up of was T.LO's rights broken or not. The fourth amendment is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. T.L.O is the person who sued because she felt that the contents in her bag were only found because it was searched unlawfully. In Juvenile Court it was decided that there had been no Fourth Amendment violation. T.L.O was searched without probably cause of any illegal activity. The fact that she was smoking cigarettes in school have the principle no reason to think she is dealing marijuana.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Jersey vs. T.L.O

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The students were then accompanied to the Vice -Principal Theodore Choplick’s office. During a somewhat interrogation Choplick questioned them about violating a school rule by smoking in the bathroom. The first girl admitted to smoking, but T.L.O denied that she had been smoking in the bathroom and stated she had never smoked in her life. Choplick then asked TLO into his private office where he furthered interrogated her and demanded she hand over her purse. Upon opening the purse he discovered a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, a small gram of marijuana, a pipe, empty plastic bags, a stack of one –dollar bills, an index card that appeared to list students who owed TLO money, and two letters that implicated T.L.O’s involment in dealing marijuana. The Vice -Principal then called the police and the girl's mother, who voluntarily drove her to the police station. At the police station, T.L.O confessed that she had been selling marijuana at school; therefore the state of New Jersey filed charges against her in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Middlesex County and placed her under one year probation. T.L.O claimed that the evidence couldn’t…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a town named Vernonia, Oregon, the local public schools faced a major problem regarding the drug use of students while participating in high school athletics (3). The Vernonia School Board were disturbed that drug use increases the risk of sports-related injury (4), so they approved an anti-drug policy, the Student Athlete Drug Policy, which requires random drug testing of the school’s student athletes (5). However, this became a conflict with the parents of a child named James Acton. The parents refused to sign a consent form to allow their kid to take the drug test because they felt it went against the 4th Amendment’s prohibition against “unreasonable” searches (6). The case was dismissed in the Federal District Court and was appealed to the Court of Appeals for the 9th District (7). This court favored the Acton families’ complaint, but random drug testing in public schools was ruled allowable in 1988 in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin (8). The case went on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to conclude conflicting court decisions (9).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill” involves students and their Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that citizens are free from unreasonable search and seizure from the government. However, school administration (an extension of government) does have the power to implement searches and seizures that may be outside of the constitutional scope in order to maintain good order and discipline in the school. This is evidenced by the Supreme Court case New Jersey vs. T.L.O where the Supreme Court ruled that requiring schools to obtain warrants for searches would interfere with the swift and informal disciplinary procedures needed in schools. However, the Supreme Court also stated that there must be reasonable grounds to conduct a search and it is limited to individualized suspicion and not group searches. Students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter school grounds.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is concerned with privacy along with search and seizure restrictions that apply in public schools, but, the Courts give school officials and police more flexibility to conduct searches in school. In this case and law review you will learn about two different cases where Courts balance a student’s privacy rights against the school’s interest in safety and student discipline. This means that students often have less protection against what they might perceive as unreasonable searches and seizures at school, than in other places. The Fifth Amendment is concerned with fundamental fairness. This means that school officials cannot hold or punish a student without stating the reason and providing an opportunity to contest the charges.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On June 26, 1995, the Supreme Court decided on the case Vernonia School District v. Acton as to whether or not random drug testing of high school athletes violated the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment. During the 1980 's and 1990 's there was a large increase in drug use. The courts decision was a strong interpretation of the Fourth Amendment and the right decision upon drug testing high school athletes.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arizona vs Grant

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kathy Davis, John Kelsey, Dia Langellier, Misty Mapes, and Jeff Rosendahl Surveillance in Schools: Safety vs. Personal Privacy Locker Searches students.ed.uiuc.edu/jkelsey/surveillance/locker.htm…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (The Free Dictionary 2013)…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For countless years, students have been drug tested, while teachers remain un-involved. Although teachers can request at any time that a student get drug tested, students are unable to request for teachers to be tested. People may believe that a teacher should not be tested, but they have just as much access, if not more, to drugs as students do. Therefore; drug testing should be required for teachers. Besides the biological parents, teachers have a powerful influence over students. If a person is going to have a career that molds the teens in our society, regardless of whatever opinion the teacher may have about marijuana or heroin, he or she should ensue the rules that have been provided by our government.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the constitution protects United States citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. Our forefathers recognized the harm and abuses that occurred in the colonies to innocent people by the British, and they made sure to write protections into the U.S. Constitution. Fearing the police state that any nation has the potential to become and recognizing that freedom and liberty is meaningless when victimization by the police is a real and foreboding threat the Fourth Amendment was created. The Fourth Amendment has gone through many challenges and controversies in the past, and currently the issue of how the Fourth Amendment applies to students in public schools has come to be contended in the courts. While it is apparent…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After this discovery he continued to search the purse thoroughly and found some marijuana, a pipe, plastic bags, money, an index card containing a list of students who owed TLO money, and two letters that signaled her in marijuana dealing. So everything being discovered now will be used against her in court. After the discovering of these items in TLO purse she was taken to the Juvenile Court and received delinquency charges which,in court TLO tried to say that her 4th Amendment was violated but the court said the search conducted by the Vice Principal was reasonable because TLO was a delinquent. On the contrary The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court came to the conclusion that there was a Fourth Amendment violation. The New Jersey Supreme Court said, holding that the search of the purse was unreasonable. She was sentenced to one year probation and brought up on charges by the local authorities. Though the Supreme Court did not say that the Fourth Amendment did not apply to students. The Fourth Amendment states that a search and seizure cannot be lawfully conducted without a warrant or probable cause. However, in a school setting, a search is considered to be reasonable and within the constraints of the Fourth Amendment if there is reasonable suspicion…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays