Should Robots Replace Jobs

Humans are pushing technology to the point where the presence of humans is absent. The downsides of robots are human workers would be obsolete, and it would be easier for a government to collect data with the help of automated robots.In addition, letting humans have too much of a trustful relationship with robots. Most opponents could argue that new jobs could be opened, new knowledge could be discovered about the world around us.As well as new software is constantly updated for maximum efficiency, trying to prove that point that robots are helpful to society. By using both sides of the drawbacks and Benefits of the Robots, it helps us decide where they could represent a threat. Despite these benefits of Robots in our world, humans are pushing
Robots will not merely take jobs, they’ll also create them.”(Khan,TechCrunch), making higher and better paying jobs.While making new and better jobs in STEM related fields, repairing, programming, and making robots, these jobs require more experience and higher skill, causing replaced workers whom jobs are also in a different field, would need to learn or go back to school to get the jobs.Concluding, that robots would make human workers obsolete. The automation of robots, government or companies and organization make it easier to collect data using the sensor on-board many robots today.Most robots today have various sensors to collect data around them, sound, location, video, distance, etc.This data is then stored on the storage in the Robot, while most robots use secure method to encrypt this data, its hasn’t stopped the government or hackers from trying to access the data found on these robots.One instance of this happening is on a Roomba, a tiny autonomous vacuum machine that so innocently clean
One example is, “A fatal 2016 crash involving a Tesla sedan was caused by the driver’s over-reliance on his vehicle’s Autopilot system and by a truck driver’s failure to yield while entering a Florida roadway, a federal panel determined Tuesday.”, (Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times).Proving, the driver had to trust in the system, which cause a accident.This could've been avoided if the driver didn’t have as much trust in the system that could fail dramatically. While many would argue that robots reduce risk with robots operation rather than Human, “Security robots offer end users and enterprise security leaders the ability to deploy cutting-edge technology to improve operational efficiencies, safely and securely patrol large areas, and integrate seamlessly with existing security investments. But that’s not all. Robots are poised to offer organizations a reduction in liability”(), as well as Tesla's autopilot mode, where the car drives itself is safer than a human driver. ”driving with Autopilot activated is 38 percent safer than non-Autopilot driving.”().Using robots we can reduce the risks of human error in our daily life. But while robots could reduce risk, like Human, there is always room for error and when there is no humans to fix the errors, it could fail horribly