Should Police Brutalizing Racial Minorities

Police Brutalizing Racial Minorities Police brutality and racial profiling has been the talk of the century. Dating back to the Civil Rights Movement, minorities have been treated as inferiors to the white race; even post Civil Rights Movement, minorities have yet to be treated as complete equals in the United States of America. In the past decade, police brutality and racial profiling have made the front page of many news articles and news channels. Law enforcement officers should incorporate using their non-lethal weapons; after all, it is unnecessary to kill someone in order to subdue them when a non-lethal weapon is available. Like most issues, there are two sides to every story. In the case regarding police brutality and racial profiling, there are indefinitely two sides. One is the agreement in which police abuse their powers and brutalize the members of minority groups. People believe that police officers often use excessive force against people who are suspected of crimes and often end up killing them. People argue that police use vague justifications in apprehending a suspect, which leads to the injury or death of a member of a minority. Also, police are allowed to use the stop and frisk method,
But a multitude of those deaths include members of ethnic minorities by law enforcement officers. With these heartbreaking events, questions start to rise. Questions such as: Are police using excessive force? Are police abusing their powers as law enforcement officers? Does racial profiling have to do with these murders? These questions are all controversial topics in which has struck America, leaving the questions unanswered. In order to lessen the uproar towards law enforcement, officers should incorporate using their non-lethal weapons that they are assigned with. It is unnecessary to kill someone in the act of subduing them. After all, law enforcement officers are equipped with their gun and weapons that are