Preview

Should People Seeking Government Assistance Be Required to Take Drug Tests?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should People Seeking Government Assistance Be Required to Take Drug Tests?
“Shouldn’t you have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check since I have to pass one to earn it for you?” That’s the question many, hardworking Americans are asking themselves. In today’s America, government aid is highly depended on. The US government has spent $498 billion dollars this year on welfare alone. Mandatory drug testing for welfare applicants is becoming a popular idea across the U.S. Many states including Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Louisiana are considering adopting laws that would require states to drug test welfare applicants.
In Florida, Republican Gov. Rick Scott passed a law that required welfare applicants to pay for and pass a drug test from July through October 2011. According to the National Conference for State Legislatures, Florida was one of three states in 2011 to put a drug testing for public assistance in the books; twenty eight states in 2012 proposed similar measures. The Department of Children and Families reported that 108 people tested positive for drugs, while 3,936 adults showed no sign of drugs in their system. Another 2,306 people opted not to take the drug test, though the survey did not ask why they were refusing to take the test, so there is no data to show whether those people objected to the policy or had obtained employment and therefore canceled their application.

In September 2011, a University of Central Florida student, with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, sued the state over the new law mandating drug testing of all welfare applicants. A little more than a month after the suit was filed, a federal judge ordered a temporary stop to the drug testing. A bench trial is scheduled for March 2013 before U.S. District Judge Mary Scriven.
Required drug tests for people seeking welfare benefits ended up costing taxpayers more than it saved. Of the 4,086 applicants who scheduled drug tests while the law was enforced, 108 people, or 2.6 percent, failed, most often testing positive for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whether or not a drug test is required by recipients of welfare has been questioned time and time again by many states. In the article "No drug test, no welfare", Kimberly Yee expands upon on this question by explaining what her stand point is on the many advantages of drug testing for welfare. In this particular article, Ms. Yee does not sufficiently argue her position on the subject of welfare recipients taking drug test to receive benefits.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ok, let's all look at this as realistically as we can; if just 1 person failed a drug test for the welfare, that's a whole extra few hundred dollars per month that our government can save, and that's only for 1 person! A typical drug test cost around $10 for the cheaper ones. That's store price too, that's not considering what government contracter bulk…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Studies show that the cost of the tests averages about $30. Assuming that 1,000 to 1,500 applicants take the test every month, the state will owe about $28,800-$43,200 monthly in reimbursements to those who test drug-free. That compares with roughly $32,200-$48,200 the state may save on one month’s worth of rejected applicants.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Isn't it ironic in our society today, that individuals are administered drug testing if they want to bring home a paycheck in efforts to provide a roof over their head, clothes on their back, and food in their mouth? At the same time it's not required by another individual who is requesting government assistance in their efforts to receive the exact same things? You could argue that the individuals applying for those jobs are not personally obligated in any way to subject themselves to undergo any drug-testing. However, those same individuals would likely be overlooked for any consideration of employment due to failure of meeting the companies drug-free policy. So why aren't welfare recipients required to undergo drug-testing in order to receive any government assistance?…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an ongoing debate on whether drug testing of welfare recipients is legal in mant of the local state governments. This paper hopes to expand on some of those topics in a por vs. con setting:…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The definition makes welfare sound easy, but there are many loop holes in the system that many people take advantage of. With over 40 million Americans receiving food stamps and 50 percent of households relying on government assistance, the system is doomed to fail if there is not a change. Hard working Americans will not be able to much longer provide what many receiving assistance have grown accustomed to. Throughout the course of American history welfare has been “reformed” many times to only cause problems later in the future. The idea of welfare was formed with great intentions, but it has spiraled out of control. Many people take advantage of the tax dollars that people work hard for. Some Americans spend their government check on drugs. They simply sale their food stamp card for extra cash to buy unnecessary things. The author of “Welfare Programs Should Include Mandatory Drug Testing” shares a personal experience and states, ‘Growing up, my mother was a recipient who abused the welfare system. I remember having no heat or electricity and being so hungry it was painful. My siblings and I would fist fight over food. She would trade her food stamp card for various things like cash, cigarettes and an occasional joint. She just wouldn 't help herself, and we were the kids that no one…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is much debate regarding this issue. Supporters of requiring drug tests for welfare applicants believe that there will be many people deterred from applying due to knowing they will not pass. They also believe that some will fail the drug tests. These supporters believe this number of people will be so large that there will be a significant decrease in welfare spending. Other supporters have said “substance abuse is a prominent barrier preventing people from making the necessary transition from governmental dependence to self-reliance.”(Targeted News Service) Opponents have said this is a direct violation of our constitutional rights as American citizens. Some have even said it is not right to assume that just because people are poor, they drug users. Other opposers of welfare drug testing have argued that it will not save money at…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal foundation for suspicionless student drug testing rests upon Vernonia v. Acton (1995). In that landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a school policy requiring student athletes to pass random urinalysis tests as a ground for participation in interscholastic sports. The Court rejected a Fourth Amendment claim asserting that such tests are an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. Closely watched nationwide, the decision effectively opened the door for school districts to institute similar policies of their own.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drug testing has its pros and cons. One pro is that it would immediately take off any drug users who could use the money for drugs or other illegal substances; adding to that, it would give people the motivation to stay off drugs for themselves and their families if they want to still receive government benefits. Some people look at it like, if people are getting jobs have to get drug tested, why don’t the people receiving welfare have to?”(HRF, 2014). One of the cons for drug testing is that people feel like it is discrimination against the poor. The poor believe that higher up people who are considered rich aren’t required to take a drug test (HRF,…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an age of laziness, and by that I mean people take the easy way out more often than they should. Now that being said, finding the easy way to do something is not always a bad thing. The case of Americans fraudulently receiving welfare checks is an example of the laziness I am discussing. As a society, we need to make this accepted practice an unaccepted practice. We need to stand up and make the process of applying and receiving these benefits more stringent than they currently are. I believe through use of mandatory random drug testing, progress monitoring, on- going physical and mental examinations, we can discourage the continued misuse of these funds.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug testing welfare recipients has been a major topic across the United States for a few years now. Many argue that if working class people are subject to a test prior to hire or randomly during the length of employment, why should those that don’t have to work for money not have the same treatment? Invasion of privacy is a huge disadvantage on the government’s part, yes it is free money but that doesn’t entitle anyone, even government, to control every aspect of your life or hold it constantly over a person’s head until they feel guilt or just flat decline assistance. Let’s ask ourselves just one question; if you went to the bank for a car loan, being this is a necessity for everyday living to own, how would you feel if they asked you to take a drug test prior to lending you the money? I feel many peoples’ tune would change drastically.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The need for welfare among society today has become increasingly large. Although the need for welfare is rapidly increasing, so is the use of drugs. This is posing as a major problem for the welfare programs. Welfare programs are now trying to put into place a new qualification where any possible recipients of welfare are required to take a drug test. For the most part, welfare recipients respect the requirements of their contract with the agency. The drug testing will just be used to eliminate any persons taking advantage of the welfare program for inappropriate use and to ensure that the welfare will go to the people who are actually in need of it. While many are more than willing to take the drug tests, there are also quite a few who are very reluctant toward this new qualification. In order to decide whether or not drug testing is a logical and fair requirement, all the pros and cons need to be laid out on the table.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many welfare programs available to the public that a lot of individuals depend upon. Without access to certain benefits some people may not survive. Such benefits include food stamps, medical assistance, cash assistance, day care vouchers and job placement assistance. Although some may argue that there are people who take advantage of the welfare programs, there are plenty of people who require and appreciate the benefits provided. Recently there has been talk of drug testing welfare recipients. Because the public is concerned with welfare recipients taking advantage of the system they want to keep drug addicts from receiving benefits. This is a major controversy right now is our society but once investigated it is clear that welfare programs should not require mandatory drug testing.…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    United States lawmakers face one of the most pressing issues of our time-welfare reform. New screening processes, often considered a direct violation of constitutional rights, have already been enacted in many states. Strong evidence exists, asserting that the practice of administering drug testing to welfare recipients will cost the U.S. taxpayers more money in the long run, stigmatize applicants and participants, and serve only the purpose of making the pharmaceutical companies more powerful. In order to protect the constitutional rights of potential welfare recipients, United States lawmakers should avoid further criminalizing the poor by submitting them to drug testing and/or a nationwide welfare registry.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But it shouldn’t be stereotyped to only people who have a history of drug abuse. Because anyone could be a drug abuser but some people just got busted in their drug use earlier than others. Granting any financial assistance to the poor individuals with drug addictions, proponents contend, does little to help them. Giving financial aid is only enabling them. We shouldn’t pay for someone welfare because they choose to be lazy. If we can work they should work to, and if they choose to suffer than that’s on them. We shouldn’t have to get our paychecks shortened to pay some one who wants to not work. We got up and put the over time in so we could get some extra not to pay someone who wants to do nothing with their life. On the other hand opponents argue that drug testing is uncalled…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics