Should Our Global Climate Change Debate Have Gone Wrong?

I am not the only one thinking that our global climate change debate has gone wrong. Too many solutions are made in short term policies and our long term investing in a better and easier future is too little considered which jeopardizes our future economy. We have disturbed the climate, and accelerated temperatures faster than naturally. To adapt to these changes it is going to bring, we need collective action. The responsibility lies in the hands on the developed countries but it is not them who are hit hardest and first which leads to moral corruption such as rationalization, denial and postponing of solutions. The conventional grab bag of public motivation does not seem up to the task (Gardiner, 2011).
Ethically correctness does not necessarily equal win-win situation for the actors
They will consider Vattenfall plans to sell coal power in Germany. Selling coal power could lead to the release of one billion tons of carbon dioxide and cannot be looked at, from a climate perspective, than nothing less than a disaster. Now is the time that the government needs to take responsibility for the situation and do something proactive, which accelerates the development of a renewable energy system in Germany.
Through state-owned Vattenfall, we control one of the largest coal fields in Europe: Field Lausitz in Germany. If the coal is dug up and used as fuel in power plants we can kiss limitations to Europe's emissions goodbye which will not allow us to live up to the Climate Change Convention and its goals that are set to be discussed in Paris in December. There is an immense amount of carbon dioxide, equivalent to 24 times Sweden's emissions last year (Hellberg, 2014)
Obviously, this has created an extensive debate, both in Germany and in Sweden. It is neither consistent with the objectives of the UNFCCC and the EU's internal climate. The coal must stay in the