Preview

Should Labour Embrace A Blue Future?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1799 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Labour Embrace A Blue Future?
Student number – 2217830
Should Labour embrace a blue future?
In the 2010 general election, it was won by the conservative party who became the governing party of Britain with the help of the liberal democrats in the form of a coalition. This victory saw the labour party lose their first general election since 1997 and it the 2010 general election was seen as a very poor performance for the labour, this could be due to the fact that labour lost a vast amount of votes across all social classes (Bill Jones 2010). These result clearly show in many eyes of many labour MPs that the new era of new labour is over and change is needed to aid the future of the labour party. A new direction for the labour party which became a valid option for the
…show more content…
This shift in ideology can be deemed as very successful as it resulted in labour being in power for 13 years until its lost the 2010 general election but its wasn’t a clear cut majority win for the conservatives which saw them forming a coalition, this is provided evidence that the ways of the new labour party are still be effective in this modern world we live in. As in today’s society and the development of modern politics it may be that the ideas and ideologies behind the new labour party may still be relevant and it wasn’t the ways that were going to govern the country that lost them the general election of 2010 but voters voted against the labour party due to performance and valence politics which means that a vast amount of voters base their vote on information much of which the acquire from media and other sources, this leads them to rethink their views about individual parties and leaders (The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2011 VOL 13, 283–303). Also base their vote how they believe the leaders and parties are capable of dealing with valence issues such as the economy which was the dominant issue in the 2010 election and issues like unemployment (David Sanders, 2011) The big incident which occurred under the ruling of the labour was the downfall and the banking crisis of 2007 which was a key reason to the reason why …show more content…
However the ways of the new labour party may still be relevant as modern politics voters are voting based on information and performance rather than looking into party’s policies and manifesto, so it is likely that labour lost due valence politics and not based on their policies and ways of governing the country. So the new labour ways may be able if it’s adopted correctly to grant electorate success but it’s very unlikely that it will be adopted due to the change in leadership. Blue labour probably does have a future in the labour party due to the fact that it has been credited by the Ed Miliband and there is signs that he is implementing and accepting ideas of blue labour and incorporating them with his slightly left wing ideas (Rowenne Davis 2011)Also labour should embrace this blue future as it is a radical change which is suited for a radically changed society and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The enfranchisement of the working classes meant the newly formed Labour party together with socialist ideologies were beginning to put pressure on the Government to introduce reform. (2/3)…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason why Conservatives won is that in there manifesto they promised to stabilise the cost of living which would close the gap between rich and poor and double everyone’s standard of living. This was helped by Labour being identified with the working class rather than the nation as a whole. This was a problem as 40% of manual workers now considered themselves middle class so the Labour policies for the unemployed and working class no longer appealed to them, instead they…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many believed that Thatcher offered an alternative to the Labour government, a change, so after Callaghan’s government was destroyed by economic crises, rising unemployment, hostile trade unions and political misjudgements the Conservatives had a landslide victory with 43.9% of the vote. Before the Conservative rise to power with Thatcher, the Labour party had experience many troubles during their time in government, perhaps this is why the Conservatives won the General election. However was this win purely down to the conservatives and their policies or was it down to the failure of the Labour party.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tories won in the 1959 was a due to a culmination of factors that both forced Labour’s downfall in support and promulgated “just how good life was” for the British people under Tory rule.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1906 general election is often referred to as the ‘liberal landslide’, but the success of the liberal party was arguably due more to conservative mistakes than what they offered new politically. A number of key conservative policies (all highly played out in the national press) all played a part in the reversal of almost 20 years of tory rule in the 1906 election.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fielding, S. (2003). The Labour Party: continuity and change in the making of ‘New’ Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.…

    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Harold Macmillan said in 1957 that Britain had “never had it so good” it was easy to see why he spoke with such optimism. The period of Conservative dominance brought many benefits to the British people including the end of rationing, full employment and a boom in the economy. However, in labour’s 1964 manifesto they described this period as “thirteen wasted years”. It seems difficult to believe that both could be true and in this essay I will be assessing the successes and failures of the Conservative government during this time.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a party the Conservatives can be seen to have achieved considerable success between the years 1918-28. Before the war the party had lost 3 consecutive elections, whereas during the period 1918-28 they were in power for all but 10 months of those 10 years (First Labour Government January- October 1924). It can then be seen through their domination of power that they were very successful. However during the first 4 of those years, whilst in power, they shared it with the Liberal Party, as their chances of winning as an individual party were near non-existent and so this limits the extent of their success. Their failings can also be seen through Stanley Baldwin, whose misjudged decision to hold a general election led the party to disaster in 1924 and lost them their position in government. I will argue that the Conservatives were very successful during those years, and that whilst such success was lessened by these two factors, the period 1918-28 was a largely prosperous time for the party.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 28 Outline

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages

    (36) Britain's Labour party, committed to revisionist socialism, replaced the Liberals as the main opposition party to the Conservatives.…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1924 Labour government was undoubtedly one of the most important developments in party politics, there were other factors that contributed to the change from Liberal vs Conservatives in the 1880 to Labour vs conservative with Liberal's downfall by 1951. The 1924 Labour government was arguably a significant development as it was the first time Labour won an election, proving they had progressed from a small independent party to a real opponent of the Conservatives. This was significant as it showed that Labour had finally gotten their foot in the door and how Conservatives had not fully recovered from their decline in the previous 2 decades. The win was a huge shock to the Conservatives, but they won in a weak position and only lasted 10 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing that affects voters’ minds when they cast their vote is there current living conditions. If they are prospering economically and enjoying life, a change to that would not be welcomed warmly. An example of this was in 2001; New Labour had won by a land slide in 1997 and did so again in 2001. Many political commentators believe that Tony Blair and his chancellor of the exchequer Gordon Browns success in national economic growth had its part to play. Most voters were enjoying the economic boom and did not want an end to that. It will also be quite interesting to see the outcome of the 2010 election is due to the fact many blame Gordon Brown for leading the country into recession and of course as many more people are unemployed or struggling financially more people want change.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, a major reason for Labour’s victory was because Harold Wilson advocated a campaign for economic modernisation of Britain so the nation did not fall behind the excelling economies of European rivals such as West Germany. Economists raise the significant point that economic modernisation looks at the internal dynamics of a nation while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The Conservatives failed in every social and economic aspect of this theory, as shown in 1963, as unemployment reached approximately 800,000 making a mockery of Macmillan’s, ‘never had it so good speech.’ The inability of the Conservative Party to economically modernise Britain led not only to their downfall in the 1964 election, but also to the collapse of Britain’s economy during this era. Economists point out that as a result of Conservative mismanagement of the economic sectors, Britain faced financial hardships, including a huge balance of payments deficit, which undeniably caused higher levels of inflation, causing the cost of living for ordinary British people to rise. Moreover, the economic boom of the late 1950s and the, ‘Age of Affluence,’ had reached its end, with great saturation in the markets for consumer goods. Inevitably, poor…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the Labour party has always adapted their agenda to the working class the Conservatives try to come across as party that does not focus on a specific class, religion or ethnicity but on terms that relate to everybody like ‘the nation’ or ‘the people’. A conservative party can do this, because their name does not, like Labour or Liberalism, imply a certain ideology. The core of Conservatism is to focus on tradition and protects the existing structure of order (Huntington,1957, p. 455). Certain changes in the 60s contributed to this, the working class was shrinking and the manual workers felt less connected by just class with the Labour. You could therefore say there was a shift from class voting to valence voting, which meant that people were less likely to vote according to their class, but more likely to vote what they believed would give the most prosperity (Turner, 2003, p. 190). This does not mean that people will automatically vote Conservative, but it does help the Conservatives because workers are less likely to vote automatically vote…

    • 2456 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays