Preview

Should Judges Be Appointed

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Judges Be Appointed
Unit III “Position Paper”
Under Article II of the Constitution, the President has the power, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint Judges of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life there for, each nomination to the Supreme Court has a long-lasting influence on the Courts decisions. Since the Supreme Court began in 1789 there have been 160 nominations for Supreme Court justices, 124 of which were approved, six of which chose not to serve. (Senate Statistics)The United State constitution has our supreme court justice nominated by the president and approved by the senate, so that the Justice isn’t pressured with facing reelection stress and political support. The System of appointing Supreme Court judges is well thought though by allowing the legislative branch check the executive branches nomination.
The Main idea behind appointing Supreme court Justices is to minimize the amount of factors that could influence a Justices court decision. The Pressure of getting reelected is something that congress members and the President face all the time. Whether it be voting of a bill with lots of publicity or the latest war congressmen and the President are always worried about how the situation will make or break their political career. Supreme Court Justice have the luxury of being appointed and can honestly and unbiased make decision on cases. Being appointed also save the justices from the hassle of campaigning like the congressmen and President have to. Campaigns are very costly and time consuming. Congressmen are up for reelection every two years this gives them one year in office until they have to start campaigning. Campaigning distracts congressmen from their duties and gives an advantage to other congressman to alter the outcome on a bill based on who will be able to attend. As shown below in the table the amount of money spent in election campaigns is astronomical.

Another factor that would alter the court justice’s



Cited: "U.S. Senate: Reference Home Statistics & Lists Supreme Court Nominations, Present-1789." U.S. Senate: Reference Home Statistics & Lists Supreme Court Nominations, Present-1789. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2012. <http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/nominations/Nominations.htm>. "OpenSecrets PolitiQuizz: The Congressional Money Chase." - OpenSecrets Blog. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/05/politiquizz-the-congressional-money-chase.html>. “The Money Behind the Elections." Opensecrets RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpicture/>. "- OpenCongress." - OpenCongress. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://www.opencongress.org/people/votes_with_party/senate/democrat>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the Supreme Court, with a chief justice and five associates, as well as federal district and circuit courts, and established the office of attorney general.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MGT 320 Mastery Exercises

    • 2152 Words
    • 8 Pages

    a. The President has the power to nominate judges with the advice and consent of the Senate…

    • 2152 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the election, if President Obama was not able to get the Senate to approve his United States Supreme Court applicant, the next president would potentially be responsible for filling the vacant spots on the court over the term due to possible retirements and deaths. If a Republican is elected president, the court could continue to issue decisions that are favorable to conservatives in the many cases it hears. If a Democrat is elected president, the court could shift towards a more liberal direction. How the new president forms the court will differ depending on which party controls the Senate after the…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Constitution was created, some topics were explained in great detail, yet some were explained very vaguely causing many disputes over how certain topics should be dealt with. In Article III, it states how the Judicial Branch works. It decides what the court bases their decisions on. In Article II of the U.S. Constitution it states how a justice must be replaced, who picks the new justice, which is the president, yet there is no time frame stated on how long it must take to pick a new justice. The president of the United States is to pick the new justice and the Senate confirms it. After a sudden death to Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, the decision must be made to pick a new justice now or to allow the new…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zane Singletary 09/16/2014 ENGL-101-16 Ms. Kimberly B. Ward Should Judges be Appointed or Elected Introduction and Outline Since the United States Democracy was first established, legislators and constituents have asked the question “Should judges be appointed or elected?”. Many state legislators have argued that since judges make decisions that directly affect constituents, they must be elected and nonpartisan races are held for judgeships. On the other hand, the United States Constitution states that all federal judges shall be appointed to the bench and have lifetime tenure so as to preserve judicial independence. Although this policy may sound admirable, this method oftentimes leads to higher executives appointing their personal comrades,…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. And also to protect our Supreme Judges from political pressure. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He served for four years in the U.S. Court of Appeals before being nominated to the United States Supreme Court. This nomination was brought about by President Ronald Regan when Justice William Rehnquist moved up to the position of Chief Justice. Justice Scalia was confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is a committee of 18 members of the United States Senate. Their jobs consist of conducting hearings before the Senate votes on the confirmation of federal judges, which also includes the confirmation of Supreme Court Justices; Justice Scalia was confirmed by the members and took his seat on September 26,…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Filibusters Research Paper

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * ”Senate Filibusters and the Cloture Rule.” Congressional Digest 90, no. 2 : 34-64. Academic Search Premier.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an argument wether President Obama should replace the justice in the election year or wait and let the next president choose.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The president and Congress have some control of the judiciary with their power to appoint and confirm appointments of judges and justices. Congress also may impeach judges, alter the organization of the federal court system, and amend the Constitution.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first state court system for the American colonies was established as early as 1629 in Massachusetts. They created what was known by as a general court system. This court was comprised of 118 elected officials, and 18 assistants. This in fact set off a chain reaction and a decade later county courts were developed and the general court took on the role of a higher court. As time progressed, so did the courts. By 1776, all of the American colonies had established fully functional court systems (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2010). In was not until 1789 when congress gathered to discuss a judicial power for the United States. So on March 4th of that same year the Supreme Court was established as the higher court for America. President George Washing signed the Judiciary Act on September 24, 1789, and later that day nominated John Jay of New York to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The justices changed a number of times throughout time, but after a time it was necessary and was determined that nine justices shall serve on the panel for the court. Even though the justices are nominated by the president, it still…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During their tenure, a Justice will be able to continue learning and understanding the law, so that in every situation they know what is constitutional and unconstitutional. Confucius once said, “Study the past if you would define the future.” The decisions of Supreme Court Justices have led to many new laws. However, those decisions are made by justices who have been doing that for a while. These Supreme Court Justices understand our past, the decisions, laws, and consequences, and know how to act upon that because of their prolonged tenure as justices. Under no circumstance does anybody just stop learning, so Justices will be ripe with knowledge until their time is done, they choose to step down, or are impeached. Therefore, Supreme Court Justices life tenure helps them understand and master their role in the Supreme…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays