Preview

Should Humans Test Subjects In Clinical Trials?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
790 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Humans Test Subjects In Clinical Trials?
1. Title: Should humans test subjects in clinical trials?
I will agree to disagree on the issue that if it is ethical to test on humans, seeing that the there is a need for it to be done however it has consequences as with all medical research. I agree for the simple fact that it is a waste of money to run tests on animals and would have to retest on humans. In say that I know that I will be called inhumane because the question would be posed to me “so what about the harmful sections of the trials would you allow humans to under all that probing etc.?”. I will defend my answer by say that it would have to depend on what type of trial is being carried out. Of course, any clinical test being carried out and humans are the test subjects; they
…show more content…
A lot of these trials drugs are associated with a number of side effects which later on cause complications in these people. Hence these researchers need to take great care in their selection process. Some may I am this inhumane, but prisoners who are serving life and death penalty sentences should be used as part of clinical trials, being treated with the exact ethical conduct as would a freeman would. This would save these research centers money, as they sometimes have to pay participants. Especially prisoners who are sick, for example with cancer they have to be taken care of by the state, this will make it less burdensome for the …show more content…
She goes on to state that these challenges have created two key factors that is causing non-successful clinical trials- the conversion of scientific findings into published clinical studies, which are need to be distributed for healthcare system medical practices (Sung et al., 2003)
Other challenges that can be found with using humans test subjects is the potential psychological issues and possible life-threatening side effects, invasions of privacy on a social and economic stance, as a life history has to be taken so there are no errors, as these trials may relieve underlying issues, which were once not known and physical harm, which will be experienced by the test subject due to the type of procedures to be carried out (UCI, Office of Research, 2014). Although the challenges of clinical research are to numerous to mention, there are benefits to them as well. Humans taking part in clinical trials make it easier and faster or results to be published and to have clearer information available to the public on that particular drug. More efficient drugs could be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does the research that we test on animals benefit humans, but it also really helps boost the world of medicine for the animals. Additionally, some of the medicines that we test for humans can be translated over to animals to help fight against the large number of animals that are dying from disease. Animals are very useful when it comes to research like this because they get to benefit from it to.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is because a human life is valued more than any other subject used in clinical trials. In order to ensure the efficacy and legitimacy of treatment, human subjects are the most accurate compared to animals. Human subjects cultivate concrete information and data necessary for the improvement of medicine and health care as a whole. Baillie, McGeehan, T.M. Garrett, and R.M. Garrett (2013) stated, “…human experimentation is necessary for medical progress. Animal testing is useful, but it cannot provide the final word on either safety or efficacy” (p. 300). On the contrary, this does not excuse the researcher from disregarding a clinical participant’s life and safety. According to Baillie et al. (2013), humans are not objects that are used however the researcher desires (p. 293). Human experimentation, conversely, has a long history of abuse. Many rules and guidelines have been set in place to prevent researchers from taking advantage of human subjects all in the name of “science”. Due to these unfortunate events, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have been established to protect and oversee the organization and conduction of human experimentation (Baillie et al., 2013). One historical event that led to the development of stringent biomedical experimentation rules and guidelines was the Tuskegee syphilis research experiment (Head, 2012). This experiment was widely acknowledged and is known as…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered as the best research design for decisions about the effect of different interventions but randomization does not apply to many clinical issues related to real world setting. The current scenario of clinical research indicates some major challenges associated with traditional clinical trials and patient care. The foremost challenges being most researchers consider RCTs as the mainstay of clinical research, which instead are slow and expensive. They rarely produce findings, which can be easily adopted into routine clinical practice. The second challenge is that traditional trials are not relevant to routine clinical practice. This is because traditional RCTs determine the effectiveness of treatments delivered to carefully selected populations under ideal conditions. As a result, this creates difficulties in translating the results to the real world. The third challenge is the evidence paradox, which shows that although hundreds of RCTs have been performed so…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, scientists have done very unwise and unimaginable experiments with humans as the test subject. Like in 1932, the public health service was working to find treatment for syphilis in the african american race.They had 600 black men, 399 with syphilis and 201 that did not have the disease. Without the patient's knowing that they were contracted with syphilis, scientists told the men that they were being treated for “bad blood”. But really they were not given the right treatment to cure their illness. Also in exchange the men received free medical exams, free meals, and burial insurance, which is like life insurance. But in 1968 this research raised concern for peter buxton and others, so they wrote a news article about what these…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of todays biggest ethical dilemmas can be found in the Medical field. We all turn our heads away and cringe when we hear the term "human test subjects", as the past has been dark and far from any morality in this domain; yet we do not cease to use the findings of the sadistic experiments. Researchers now use mice and other animals which can show the effects a(n) medication/evolution/disease may have on humans. But I find testing on clueless animals immoral.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing is so painful for animals and they don't understand why they're being put through this pain. It is also very inhumane and morally offensive. Animal testing is cruel and an inhumane way to torture animals for mankind's own benefit. There have been millions of animals that have suffered a vicious, painful death in the name of research. Lastly there are alternatives to Animal Testing such as computer modeling, As science continues to transform our world beyond what we know, and technology continues to transform and expand upon what we depend on. Medical research and testing will also transition to embrace and…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not only humans, but animals also benefit from the use of animal testing. In fact, if animals aren’t used for medical research certain vaccines for rabies, hepatitis and other diseases wouldn’t be curable (Trull). However, many people argue that the human anatomy differs from that of animals. Nonetheless, animals and humans still share common features. For example, monkeys, just like humans, share the same fundamental use of hormones to counteract infections, which has helped scientist improve research (Trull). For the people who doubt animal testing should go to hospitals and look at patients who have survived from illnesses and diseases, because if it had not been for animals lives wouldn’t be…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you feel getting chemicals dropped into your eyes and on your skin, being confined into a small cell waiting to be tortured? Now why is it fair to do this to animals? There are so many reasons why animals should not be used for scientific research. Animal testing is unethical, and completely immoral. Not to mention it is unnecessary and there are many newly developed options that avoid animal cruelty. Additionally, animal testing has been proven to be ineffective and inaccurate.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use is up. Some are injured and will still live the remainder of their life in captivity. The doctors will not do anything to help the animals that are in pain that happen to be the reason because of them. It is the aspect of animals testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred. Even though animals and humans have many things in common like how we both have the same organ system, there are also many things that are different between animals and humans. Many animals cannot handle or take the same medication as humans, most the surgeries that are operated on animals are just too strong for an animal to take so they end up dying or sick for the rest of their lives. (Animal Testing…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 3

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In my opinion, a lot of people in foreign countries are uneducated and therefore, may not fully understand the risks, complications and side effects of these experimental drugs. If they do not have the means to adequately research the drug prior to testing it, they may end up doing so without fully understanding what potential side effects are involved. I am not sure how well companies educate these foreign countries and or people involved in the case study. If these people are not educated properly than it is unethical for them to test experimental drugs on them.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Rights - Paper 3

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people feel that animals have no rights and are here solely for our use.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Human Society International it states that 9/10 candidate medicines that appear safe and effective in animal studies fail when given to humans. This shows that every 10 experiments done on animals only 1 will work. This also shows that animals are being killed even if the experiment doesn’t work. In the UK an estimated 70,000 people are killed or severely disabled every year by unexpected reactions to drugs. All these drugs have passed animal tests (Human Society International). This shows that animal testing isn’t reliable if the medicines that are approved are killing people who are taking them. This is important because if the medicines are killing people that have been tested on animals, their should be a new way to make sure they’re safe.This shows that animal testing is useless and there should be another way to make sure drugs are safe before giving them to…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    rights and well being of the participants must be weighed against the study's value to…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, ethical human experimentation is okay as long as it follows the Nuremberg code. Animal experimentation should not be used as it is considered torture to the animals and you would not get exact results for humans than you would with animals.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays