Preview

Should Human Cloning Be Banned?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Human Cloning Be Banned?
The informational piece of Pro-Human Cloning that is produced by Simon Smith describes that cloning should be legalized because it allows couples another alternative to conception so if parent(s) want to have children that have the same genetically related child whose DNA was similar to those of the parent. Moreover, it allows the curing and prevention of diseases, and it allows one to clone organs and cells to improve treatment of life threatening-illnesses.
However, even though Simon Smith reveals some reasons why human cloning should not be banned, I do not agree with the writer, I think human cloning must be banned because of medical cloning is immoral by exploits woman for her eggs; creates and destroy human life, shows a lack of respect
…show more content…
And we know from nature’s law that the strongest will win, if we are normal people must fight against superhuman clones, we will lose for sure and our race as normal person will be extinct and being replace by clone people even though we are the creator of them, so we must be careful of doing that.
Another reason why human cloning should be banned is because the population will be exploded (McGee), since the problem of some great countries are over population, if they clone a lot of human even the success rate is small they will make population really crowded, its implication is that we won’t have enough resources and food to nourish cloned humans. This idea is demented, think about the poor kids in the third world countries would it be fair to them? They deserve to have food on their table every meal. We first have to think about others, and then we can think about our people that have passed
…show more content…
Nakasone, a Buddhist priest and Professor of Buddhist Art and Culture at the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, California stated, "The Buddhist response to the possibility of cloning human beings is not if, but when . . . Would we accord a cloned person the benefits enjoyed by those who are born naturally? I would hope so." Buddhists even believe in the natural order of the world and to clone humans would be violating that rule. In addition, why human cloning should be banned is because human clone can be a fraud or criminal, so our clone will do something horrible with our identity, some police departments will be difficult to track the real criminal if we have the same genetics, the same physics but not the same manner, it is not good for us as good people to be libel by our clone if our clone is not good clone. We can see some religions are against the human cloning because it is not our right to play God by creating

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As revealed earlier, cloning humans has a high failure rate, because there are many barriers put in by nature to prevent an “unnatural” event from occurring. These barriers can happen anytime during the cloning process. For example, the enucleated egg might not be compatible with the donor nucleus, the newly transferred nucleus may not grow and develop properly, the step where the embryo is implanted into the surrogate could fail, or the pregnancy may fail. Even if the pregnancy succeeds, there is no guarantee that the clone will act like a clone unless the right genes are activated. In a transferred human cloning, the scientist has to re-program the nucleus and force it to pretend as if it belongs in an early embryonic stage. If the nucleus is not programmed properly or completely, the embryo will more than likely become abnormal or die. Now, if the embryo manages to pass all of the post-zygotic barriers, “there is a possibility that the [fully developed] cloned individual might carry certain abnormalities…” causing them to live a shorter life span than expected (Wickman). There are also other concerns, besides health-related, such moral issues. The ability to clone individuals could lead to an out-of-control situation created by someone who wants to create an army of genetic replicas by abusing the new…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main issues that cloning brings about is whether or not people will take advantage of this new technology. For instance, Lewis Thomas wonders if “the rich and powerful but socially objectionable” or the “governments of dumb, docile masses” will misuse the technology. These seemingly important people may be able to give themselves a “version of immortality”. Just because the ability to clone exists does not mean that valuable people should be able to multiply themselves. No one on Earth is exactly the same for a reason, and it should stay that way. If there were to be several hundred Paris Hiltons or Kim Kardashians walking around, the world would be a pretty terrifying place. People should remain unique, separate from the “precise sameness” that Thomas…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning is a process in which an organism or cell is replicated. Cloning should stop because it is not natural, it is wrong to force specific results. Cloning causes animals to live a shorter amount of time or be born with LOS causing permanent damage. What is not natural should not be forced especially if the results are…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While a large portion of society do not believe that we should clone any species there is the portion that whole heartedly support the quest to prefect not only the cloning of animals but the cloning of humans. By cloning we can create new ways to fight diseases and other health problems by doing things like cloning a liver for a person whose is shutting down. Cloning can also help bring a species back from the brink of extinction due…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning could provide many advantages but includes many risks like the possibility to start a whole new war. An army of clones could be created which means other counties would have to follow. Cloning should still be legal because it could help people even this risk.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, there are bad points about cloning. The success rates of cloning are very low. Cloning has a 70% failure rate of being mutated. Another bad point is that it will reduce variety in people. So if the environment changes, the clones wouldn’t be able to adapt to the environment.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human Cloning Is Wrong

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Second, there are a lot of disadvantages and bad effects of human cloning such as emotional risks and improper wars. For example, a baby is born by cloning without parents, after going to school and being in class with his classmates who were born normally, then imagine what the child fell about himself. He will ask why he does not have parents and how he could be born. This is one of the disadvantages of human cloning as emotional risks. There is a small group of people who want to destroy a country such as terrorists. Because they do not have enough people, they just clone themselves couple times in order to get enough people to destroy the country. Then, you can imagine that will be many copies of same human who are used for war. I call this an improper war which is…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cloning Debate

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When asked why these people did not support cloning, 34 percent believed that it was against their religion, 22 percent believed that it interfered with distinctiveness and individuality, another 22 percent were concerned that cloning could be used for questionable purposes, 14 percent were worried about the technology used, 5 percent had a different reason not previously mentioned, and 3 percent were just against it for an unknown reason. People are concerned scientists are “playing God” and these creatures are abominations. The question of ethics is often brought up to surround this topic, the quality of life for the clones is a big issue. Clones do not live as long as their “original copy” and often suffer more genetic disorders as well as other health issues (1). Other people worry that if human clones came into existence, they might be treated as second class citizens or be locked up waiting for their organs to be harvested. For these reasons, “Scientific organizations like the American Academy for the Advancement of Sciences have spoken in favor of a ban on human cloning until it can be done safely.” (7). However, most scientists are in favor of cloning, as long as it is under strict government control and ethical review. Others look forward to bringing extinct animals back into existence and helping endangered creatures from that fate.…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To me cloning has way too many horrible outcomes. For example, there is an extremely high…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ethical issues that are raised from to this issue have not been successfully debated about, and is still in the grey, and thus human cloning could produce more problems than solutions among between the opposing members of NZers. Ethical issues such as ‘are clones entitled to human rights’, what is the clones’ identity crisis, is the clone an individual or an extension of the copied human, etc raises far too many sub-branching questions, most of which cannot be answered without making implications on other controversial issues, such as abortion, contraceptives, murder, etc. For the sake of our current social stability, reproductive clones should not be introduced into our world, which threatens the moral values, dignity and pride that our laws, society, and as individual humans, stand firmly…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just as times change, so do the solutions to problems we are faced with. There is a certain point however, when we have to reevaluate just how much we should allow these new technologies to take over our lives. Human cloning holds extraordinary capabilities that definitely have the power to change our lives and the lives of future generations. Would it benefit us to have the capability to clone a human being? Perhaps, but do the pros outweigh the cons?…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statistics from the National Funeral Directors Association show that 8.8 people die in death per every on one thousand in the U.S. population, with the population at over two hundred billion to date. If cloning were introduced in to society, I feel that the death rate would slowly decrease. If cloning were used for medical purposes, scientist would be able to create healthy lungs for cancer patients, or new hearts for heart patients, which would drastically reduce waiting lists for people who need vital organ transplants to live.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Have you ever had one of ‘those’ days? You know which ones; the days where there just aren’t enough hands to go around or enough time to finish everything that needs to be done. Those are the days that people tend to have that one fleeting thought: “If only there were two of me, I could relax while my clone does all the work!” But if they had the chance to try it, to have a clone, knowing all of the risks and consequences involved, would they go through with it? No, probably not, but the average person doesn’t think about what the repercussions of cloning themselves may be: repercussions that justify the outlawing of the cloning process.…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bio Ethics

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The article on human cloning starts talking about the successful cloning of a sheep and the successful chances in trying to clone a human based on results from monkeys. Morally some people think that cloning humans is no worse than creating custom embryos from sperm and egg donors. According to some scientists it’s only a matter of time until a human is cloned. Some advantages or pros in cloning are being able to express character genes that weren’t present before. Another pro is if someone is diagnosed with cancer you could clone him or her and use the clone as a bone marrow donor. Scientists believe clones can be useful in a variety of ways, but it is society that determines the its morality. The other points of viewing brought up in this subject are the cons. One major con is determining whether cloning is a moral issue or is it even legal. Other cons would ask what would the results be? Is it harmful? Or what would happen after a long period of time?…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For these reasons, I am against human cloning. We can't let people make clones for their satisfaction and for commercial purposes. A lot of people worry that cloned people would not have full rights, since they are just copies. I find this reasoning absolutely ridiculous, since a person is a person despite their genetic source or of artificially…

    • 352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics