Should Condoms Be distributed in Schools?

Rush Limbaugh is a well-known man for speaking his mind on his radio show and through interviews. Limbaugh the author of The Way Things Ought To Be, The Way Things Aren’t and The IRS v. the People; he’s also a radio talk show host in Sacramento CA. Limbaugh wrote an article on sex education titled, Should Condoms Be distributed in Schools? While Rush Limbaugh article may be convincing, but when reading his article his argument is not secure. He uses Argument ad Hominem Post Hoc Ergo and Proof by Example, He’s article is vague by his poor choice of words and not interacting with his audience in a direct way. Rush Limbaugh states in his 12th stanza line 11’ “if anyone is trying to trick students, its Planned Parenthood and this band of hedonists who try to tell kids that a condom will protect them from any consequences of sex” this statement Limbaugh uses is an Argument ad Hominem. An Argument ad Hominem is the meaning of attacking ones individual’s opinion by his/hers personality, thereby changing the attention from the value of the proposal. When Limbaugh calls Planned Parenthood “a band of hedonists” he’s bombarding Planned Parenthood attacking there slogan that its okay to have sex as long as you are safe and smart about it, and making them sound to he’s readers that are reading his article like a bunch of hyper sexuality individuals that its okay to have sex we want you to have sex. In Limbaugh article paragraph 17 lines 2-6 he uses Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc fallacy, which is presuming a cause, and effect relationship where none exists even though one event preceded another. He sates that “according to Los Angeles Times, administrators in Los Angeles public schools have regretfully acknowledged that the sex education courses undertaken in the early1970s “might” have correlation to the rising teen pregnancy rates in there schools which can traced to the same years.” Limbaugh wants to compare the 70s era to our 21st century era blaming that because