Preview

Should College Athletes Be Paid Rhetorical Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should College Athletes Be Paid Rhetorical Analysis
Authors such as Abdul-Jabbar, Swanson, Yankah all represent different viewpoints on the controversial topic whether or not college athletes should be paid. Despite each of the authors having polar opposite views on the topic, each author is similar by using rhetorical strategies to their advantage in trying to educate and persuade their audience. Through the use of appeal to ethics, personal experiences, and historical examples the authors share the common goal of convincing their audience whether or not college athletes should be paid. The first of the articles,written against college athletes getting paid, is titled, “Why NCAA Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid”. The article was published in The New Yorker on October 14, 2015. The author is …show more content…
The author of several books, he uses his writing skill to start his article off with a tremendous emotional hook. He describes child boxing matches in Thailand, where 9 and 10 year old children fight until one knocks the other out or renders them unable to continue-all the while as parents and other spectators bet on the outcome. He then compares child boxing matches in Thailand with last year’s NCAA basketball tournament. While not as brutal, the economics of the tournament are staggering. The NCAA earned $ 900 million, while another $ 9.2 billion were gambled on the tournament. He then drives home the point that, just like the Thai child boxers, no player participating in the NCAA basketball tournament received a dime from the …show more content…
When the reader has first read the title of the article and so begins reading and is soon surprised at a number of things said in the first paragraphs. Yankah lists a number of things that he considers to be unfair - most of which deal with the exploitation of athletes. Several paragraphs into the article, he finally makes his point: that the push to pay college athletes is almost insulting in that it both fails to recognize the role of the athletic participation as part of the total college experience and seems to ignore the reality that it is only a very small fraction of the athletes will ever actually make it to the professional level. (The NCAA has run commercials recently that say, “There are almost 400,000 college athletes and practically all of them are going pro in something other than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million,” (Mitchell & Edelman). The money collected by the NCAA, goes towards the sports and the programs, not the players themselves, however, the NCAA says that “Student-athletes are at the heart of the NCAA’s mission,” (NCAA). “Some athletes and their supporters believe that college athletes deserve some type of financial payment for their services and contributions to their institutions, an opinion that has lead to player-initiated lawsuits, court cases, and strikes,” (Garcia).…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “...Is money such a big problem for these student-athletes? Don't they receive scholarships? How much more money do they need?” Most college athletes received scholarships to play for the college they’re going to. They should not receive money for going to school and choosing to play a sport that they don’t have to do. Sports is always an option, no one has to play and no coach is going to force a student to play a sport and maybe cause a distraction from doing their school work.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    College Athletes Cons

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author has fully comprehended his topic. He understands the pros and cons of paying the athletes, and compares the two different sides. For example, one of his opposing viewpoints was that, "…the student-athletes make schools millions of dollars, yet receive no cut of the profit". This pro statement is then countered…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pay for Play

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Ever since the National Collegiate Athletic Association was formed in 1905, their role in regulating intercollegiate athletics has involved many different tasks. These tasks include making athletics safe in order to prevent injury, marketing athletic events, regulating and changing rules in order to make college sports more fun for the fans, and enforcing the key principle of college sports: amateurism. Amateurism in college athletics means that athletes are unpaid. As a result, the NCAA has had to deal with deciding how to handle issuing and assigning monetary value of scholarships and grants. However, the NCAA has not had to manage the debate over college athletes getting paid to play. In a day where more and more college athletes are leaving college early to enter the professional leagues it is time to ask a question: Should division-I college athletes get paid? The question is based on the assumption that there is a place for college athletics within a university. The NCAA should be looked at economically because the universities within it generate profits through their athletic departments and operate as businesses by assessing costs, revenues, etc. With that assumption established, because of the market inefficiency and exploitative characteristics of the NCAA, division-I college athletes should get paid in a free-market environment. Division-I college athletes recognize that they are exploited and receiving a scholarship worth less than their market value, so they have no incentive to not cheat and accept illegal payments.…

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cronk’s article offers his professional perspective on the unjust treatment and regulations by the NCAA and why they must compensate student-athletes for their work and image. Cronk’s article quotes many NCAA guidelines and principles in order to provide the audience with reasons why the NCAA can’t pay student-athletes. The main focus of Cronk’s article…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bokshan, Amanda. ”Viewpoint: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid." USA TODAY College. N.p., 2 Nov. 2011. Web. 28 Oct. 2014. Bokshan argues that college athletes should not be paid because of where the money would come from. This article has ethos because it is written by a college student who is studying sports management. Because she is a sports management major, it shows she is knowledgeable when it comes to sports. This source will provide good information on why the athletes should not be paid. The information is coming from a sports fan who know a good amount of information from her studies as well. The author wrote this article for a campus newspaper, meaning she wrote it out of pleasure. I can incorporate this source because I can relate to the author.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The notion of paying college athletes has been an ongoing and controversial debate for student-athletes, coaches, schools, media and most certainly the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Many would argue that playing major college sports is more like a job versus an extracurricular activity. As with the majority of many student athletes, some attend college with the aspiration of becoming professional players thereby college is seen as a means to end. Although student-athletes already receive compensation via full and partial scholarships to participate at the college level, passionate conversations will continue to be a topic of debate because of the enormous revenue generated by college sports.…

    • 3400 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion there are very many things and aspects we can argue here. The only thing that is right is that college athletes should be compensated. Coaches make way too much money along with the school its self with all of the advertisements. When the black market is up people are not playing fair and everyone is fighting for the right to play. College athletes work too hard to not get paid. College athletes should be…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In recent years, colleges throughout the nation have come across plenty of controversy concerning the idea of whether or not athletes should be paid to play sports in college. To this day the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) deems this a violation of their rules, and that is no matter what the amateur status of the players who make college athletics a billion-dollar business is not going to change (“Associated Press”, 2013). Even though the issue is constantly being debated and to some the answer remains "up in the air" still to this day (Dabad, n.d.), I think the answer is quite simple on why college athletes shouldn’t be paid.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Are college athlete’s players or employees? The idea of paying a college athlete appears to be outrageous to some. The thought of giving someone money for something they have chosen to do may not appear to be fair. The greatest concern is where to draw the line. Should the decision be based on the amount of money and fame the program generates? Why should athletes be treated special and receive compensation for their contribution to the school? One major factor is that athletes make numerous sacrifices beyond that of a nonathletic student. Many athletes can’t seek employment to help offset the expenses of college because they are on the field or court for the majority of their day. Their time and effort is devoted to that of the school, thus potentially sacrificing their education. In many cases, athletes don’t receive funding for college, which means that not only are they paying financially, but physically to compete. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. If the athletes are fortunate enough to receive a scholarship, usually that is the only benefit. This in turn leads to taking out loans and having to look for other scholarships or sources of compensation, but this doesn’t stop them from being involved in the teams’ activities. The real question is why shouldn’t an athlete in college be paid to play? College athletes are the real moneymakers for the school, and they should be paid to play.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “But, is money such a big problem for these student-athletes? Don't they receive scholarships? How much more money do they need?” (Meshefejian). College athletes getting paid is a big issue because it leads to many question on if they do get paid or don’t. If college athletes got paid they would have to deal with how much they should get paid and who gets paid the most. But many that say they should get paid is because they raise a lot of money for their schools and Tv programs. They also say they should because they don’t have enough money to afford food and things they need. I agree they do need extra money but everybody thats in college are not athletes.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Student athletes should be compensated for their work, as they are the sole reason for the Athletic Program’s surplus in revenue. These athletes are working for the schools and are doing a service to the college that seems to go unnoticed. Colleges are using these athletes to boost their respective reputations and bring in revenue while not compensating these athletes for their work. Everywhere else athletes are paid, so why shouldn’t college students too? Some critics may argue that these student-athletes are amateurs, and if paid then are becoming professional athletes. The minor league for baseball could be considered an amateur sport, although they do receive pay according to the team’s revenue.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I have analyzed these two articles I hope that you will have a better understanding of what I am trying to get across. Both articles were very well set up to persuade the reader on why college athletes should be paid to pay and why they should not. After carefully analyzing both arguments Both Authors used many facts that still…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should college athletes be paid to play their sport? This has been a hot topic discussed by many people over the past several years. Through my research, I have come across several different opinions on this matter. I have also found many pros and cons to paying college athletes.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletics have gained immense popularity among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the participating colleges which has fuelled the debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Athletes should not receive payment for their athletic play for reasons such they already receive a full scholarship, which athletes would get paid, and undermines what college is all about.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays