Preview

Should Capital Punishment Be In Place For Heinous Crimes?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1117 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Capital Punishment Be In Place For Heinous Crimes?
Capital punishment should be in place for heinous crimes because it acts as a deterrent for criminals; life terms are not effective; and rehabilitation does not help.
Capital Punishment will help criminals determine their actions before committing a crime. Ernest van den Haag, a professor of Jurisprudence at Fordham University, Adjunct Professor of Social Philosophy at New York University, and lecturer in Sociology and Psychology at the Graduate/Undergraduate Faculties, has been studying deterrence in people very closely. He stated,”Whatever people fear most is likely to deter most.” Professor Van den Haag believes that we must use their fears, so maybe they won’t murder or commit horrible crimes. Some people are afraid of death, but they can’t
…show more content…
87% of criminologists do not believe the death penalty is a proven deterrent to homicide and other harsh crimes. The studies and tests normally aren’t finished or aren’t complete. This shows that its not proven to deter crimes or that it does help keep criminals.(deathpenalty.org) Life imprisonment is better from the criminal because there are botched executions. Lethal injections are inhumane and are cruel to the criminal. A paramedic, becoming a physician, failed to find a vein after a dozen stabs into Locketts arm. After stabbing and hopefully finding a vein, Lockett suffered for one hour and 57 …show more content…
“The victim is already dead-you cannot bring him back. When the opponents feel “fear of death” will prevent one from committing murder.(prodeathpenalty.com)” The criminal shouldn’t have the chance to go to rehab due to his crimes. Rehab can’t just change their way of thinking. Murdering has been their way of thinking and it's hard to relearn something. For instance, drug rehabilitation, approximately 65 percent complete the treatment but only about 30% stick with being sober.(recoveryvillage.com.) Drug users may see or smell a drug and have an urge to use again. With murderers a possible victim could have made them angry or is their soon to be victim is like the last victim they have murderer. Many murderers after they are incarcerated they had motive and will normally stick to it, for that's the only they may know. It's like a routine for them.They have an urge to follow them and kill them just like the last time. Murdering to a murderer is like a drug to a drug user, they have it have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively…as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historically there is no clear evidence that the death penalty has decreased the murder rate or acted as an effective deterrent to murder. Capital punishment is a violation of natural rights. This is wrong for everyone who is involved: The prosecuted innocent, the criminals, the victim’s family and our nation. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for the innocent. Nothing good comes out of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) It prevents the individual from committing more crimes while they are incarcerated. B. [Attack the reasoning] Second, although capital punishment could be seen as a deterrent, there’s no data to support the claim. 1. From a scholarly essay written by John Lamperti, a professor of mathematics at Dartmouth university, the author does a statistical analysis on whether or not capital punishment deters murder.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kennedy Vs Louisiana

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These are the three main points to support my opinion of capital punishment. First, innocent people go to jail or get assassinated over things they didn’t do. Second, when criminals are put into jail, they get out in a certain amount of years, then go back to the crime they did before. Lastly, racial discrimination is everywhere, even in court. Proving a deeper perspective, I will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that capital punishment does not deter crime.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the Death Penalty be allowed in the United States? What are some pros and cons of the death penalty? Some believe that the death penalty is a clever idea, however; I feel the death penalty is a very harsh punishment. The paragraphs below will explain in detail why I am against the death penalty. The cost of having criminals on death row versus life in prison, the mentally ill criminals, and the unfairness to the criminals.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment will deter people from committing a crime. In 1973, Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing a murder. For each execution, the crime rate dropped by over 18%. By having the death penalty in our law system, it will teach kids to stay in school, so they don't get into…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People also believe that the death penalty is a deterrent to criminals, the most powerful weapon to prevent the crime occurred. But the fact is the death penalty compared with other kinds of punishment, the death penalty does not deter crime has a special function. Offenders can be divided into two categories: Impulsive type and plan type. For impulsive, they are in the non-rational state at the time of crime, reckless commission of a crime, the death penalty cannot afford deterrent for them. For the plan type, there are too many elements need priorities than death, such as Benefits available on crime, criminal attitude towards his life and so on. Thus, the deterrent effect of the death penalty not prominent than other kinds of punishment. As some homicide, injury, rape, crimes were mostly due to some conflicts or situations stimulation, so that the loss of reason, impulsive, and at the moment committed a crime. In this case, the perpetrators are often impossible to accurately discretionary legal consequences of his crime may cause. For these people, the death penalty deterrence can be said too late to play. Furthermore, most of these people will regret afterward, in fact, sentenced these people to death runs counter to repentance, even those who escaped will continue to stimulate criminal psychology. According to studies, many murderers have that idea after killed first person: "kill one person is dead, kill more people is dead too, so it's ok to kill more.” So the death penalty maybe is an indirect stimulation of the…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who support the death penalty would argue that the death penalty deters people from murder because they are scared of being sentenced to death. It might scare some people, but the vast majority of murders would kill anyway, for most murders are not rationalizing their actions. Also, according to some being sentenced to life is a worse punishment than the death penalty for death would put them out of their misery. The life sentence is just as bad as a death sentence, so why have the death penalty at all? The death penalty is not beneficial. It only creates problems.…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has not been proven to deter crime and it opens the possibility of executing innocent people. That is why the United States of America should abolish the death penalty.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ For hundreds of years people have considered capital punishment a deterrence of crime. Seven hundred and five individuals have died since 1976, by means of capital punishment; twenty-two of these executions have already occurred this year at Death Penalty Information Center”, exclaims Tara Volpe in her article, Capital Punishment: Does Death Equal Justice? In another article written by Coretta King, the author states that, “In recent years, an increase of violence in America, both individual and political, has prompted a backlash of public opinion on capital punishment”. Capital punishment is a tremendous issue that faces the criminal justice system. Some people think that capital punishment is a good idea for those who commit capital or very serious crimes; on the other hand, some people believe that capital punishment is wrong. In reality, capital punishment is wrong for several reasons.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Went Out Death Penalty

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages

    If one tries hard enough they can research and find the statistics that will help them back their position in the ongoing debate. The fact that the debate is ongoing provides the fuel to both sides to push their agenda and hope that the undecided voters in the debate will take up their side and push the numbers up on one side that the opposite side can’t dispute and finally bring closure to the question of vengeance or deterrent, as opposed to unlawful state sanctioned murder or legal justice. Factors that are used for and against the death penalty are not always the exact opposites that one might suspect. It is not as clear as night and day, or hot and cold. Those that are in favor of the death penalty base their support on the factors that the death penalty is a deterrent to those that commit horrendous crimes such as rape, kidnapping, and the killing of a police officer. Those opposed to the death penalty point to the fact that the statics say that is not the case. They cite how states with death penalty laws do not have lower serious crime rates than states that do not have the death penalty laws. In fact, there is actually proof that their murder rate is higher. This has been thought to be supported by the fact in those death penalty states rates are higher because the person that is committing a crime feels that if they let the person live they will have to face them in court if…

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a cruel and barbaric way to stop crime. Most kids have heard the expression “do not fight fire with fire.” Using the death penalty is doing just that. Punishing criminals for murder by doing exactly what landed them in jail in the first place seems counterproductive. Instead, making felons live in prison, reflecting on their actions, gives them the opportunity to learn from their mistakes. No one would be able to live with themselves if they were involved with an innocent man being wrongfully executed. Eliminating capital punishment would make that fear…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays