Products

About

©2019 StudyMode.com

Should Britain have a written constitution?

Topics: Separation of powers, Constitution, Judicial review Pages: 3 (942 words) Published: November 29, 2013
At present in Britain we have no written constitution, but instead have a collection of laws and conventions that govern our political system. Along with Israel, we are one of only two democracies in the world not to have a written constitution. A more precise way of describing our constitution is that it is uncodified, which means that parts of it are written down but it is not a single authoritative document or set of rules.

The main argument against a written constitution is that Britain has survived very well without one and that the strength of an unwritten constitution is its ability to evolve according to circumstances because it is not set in stone. As well as being flexible, the current system also has a number of informal checks and balances built into it, mostly based on convention, so that there is a degree of balance between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, which suggests a written constitution would be unnecessary. An example might be the practice of Parliament not commenting on sentences handed down by the courts.

Another argument against a written constitution is that it would have to be relatively vague in places to allow it to evolve with society, and as a result would be constantly open to judicial interpretation. This would cause problems because unelected and unaccountable judges would be able to overrule an elected Parliament, thus undermining its sovereignty. Judges are also unrepresentative of the public and might interpret the law in a biased way. These reasons show that a written constitution would be undesirable.

It could also be argued that a written constitution is unachievable because politicians on the left and right would disagree massively over what exactly it should contain. It would thus be extremely time consuming to reach agreement on the content of a codified, as there would be a variety of different views about the powers of each branch of government, and the rights and obligations of...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Should Britain Have a Codified Constitution? Essay

    ...Should Britain have a fully written codified Constitution? Britain is one of the oldest democracies in the world, which has gradually evolved from Magna Carta in 1215 to the modern time. But one thing significantly differs the UK from all other democratic countries- that is its Constitution [which is a set of principles that establishes the distribution of power within a political system, the limits of government jurisdiction, the rights of citizens and the method of amending the Constitution itself]. For a start, nobody knows what is the UK Constitution. That is not to say [as people often and lazily do] that it is unwritten. Some parts of it are very written indeed. Nobody denies that the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 are parts of the Constitution as well as other Acts. But British Constitution does not exist as a single, codified document. Moreover, some parts of it, such as conventions, do not exist in a written form. The question whether the UK should have a codified Constitution has been asked many times in the past few decades to different governments but no serious attempts to convert the idea of a written Constitution into reality were made. But does the UK really need to “catch up with the modern world” and...

    Read More
    1577 Words 4 Pages
  • Should Britain Have a Codified Constitution Essay

    ...Codified constitution For • A new constitutional settlement is needed to disperse power more widely. • The rights of citizens are under threat and require greater protection. • The police have been given increasing powers as crime and the threat of terrorism have increased. • The state holds a huge amount of information about individuals. • Rights in the workplace need firmer guarantees as trade unions have become weaker. • Parliament has the potential to make and unmake any law as its powers are unrestrained. • There will be less constitutional crises as there will not be confusion as to what is 'unconstitutional behaviour'. • Basic rights of citizens are identified and guaranteed. • For protection from extremists. A written constitution would offer protection if an extremist came to power and wanted to disregard democratic procedures. Against • Britain has survived very well until now with an unwritten constitution. The public is not clamouring for a written constitution because it understands the conventions which govern political procedure. • Written constitutions are ruled upon by judges. In Britain our judges are unelected and it is therefore undemocratic to take power away from our elected representatives and give it to...

    Read More
    316 Words 2 Pages
  • Should the UK have fully written constitution Essay

    ...Should the UK Have fully written constitution? UK has partly an unwritten and uncodified constitution. Such a system, like any other, has their advantages and disadvantages, but because of their unusual system there are a lot of disputes around it. A big question at hand is: “Should the constitution be fully written or not?” A codified constitution means that all the points and laws are written and could be read, such a constitution typically occurs at some critical moment in a country’s history. An uncodified constitution is one that was formed naturally with historical development. In order to assess, whether UK should have a codified constitution it is necessary to consider such issues like flexibility and entrenchment, clarity and constitutional sources, historical development. The British constitution is quite flexible and all its constitutional laws are not guarded from changes. Any change could be made by the parliament who are the main and the most powerful body in the British political system. Parliament has ultimate legal authority and freedom to make and enforce any political decisions without limits; so any law can be easily changed with a simple act of Parliament. Sometimes such simple procedures are convenient and even essential....

    Read More
    1188 Words 4 Pages
  • Essay on Should Britain Introduce a Codified Constitution?

    ...Should Britain introduce a codified constitution? The British constitution is unwritten, although it may be less misleading to call it uncodified as various aspects of the constitution are written down. The term uncodified means the constitution is not all kept in a single document, but is spread about in various pieces of legislature. It also means British laws, policies and codes are developed through statutes, common law, convention, and recently European Union law. Although the British constitution does not have a clear set of rules in one single document, it does clearly state in various documents where political power is held, and how it is allocated. With the constitution being uncodified it makes it very flexible and easy to alter or change. This means if a new situation has to be dealt with by policies or laws, they can quickly be changed to do so with minimal implications. All that is needed for a policy to be changed is a ‘simple act of parliament’ (essentially parliament must agree on it). Unlike written constitutions, old policies and other constitutional practices don’t make it difficult to deal with new situations because new ones can be developed when the need arises. Another argument for maintaining an uncodified constitution is that it could be said that it has served...

    Read More
    888 Words 3 Pages
  • 'The absence of a written Constitution Essay

    ...Prep Activity for Public Law Workshop 1 ‘The absence of a written constitution … enables constitutional change to be brought about within the United Kingdom with the minimum of constitutional formality’ (Hilaire Barnett, Constitutional and Administrative Law 2011) Intro Whilst not completely, I largely agree with the statement posed in the question. Define Constitution Ultimately, the UK has an uncodified Constitution, derived from a number of sources, but revolves around the principle of Parliamentary supremacy, and, as such, an Act of Parliament can effectively change the nature of the UK’s constitution. The very presence of this aforementioned parliamentary supremacy is overwhelmingly different from the rigidity of codified constitutions found elsewhere, most notably in the United States and France. Nevertheless, the incorporation of EU law into UK law has certainly affected the flexibility afforded by an uncodified constitution. All of these aforementioned points shall be developed. Nature of Constitution Statute – Majority needed. (Bill of Rights 1689, Act of Settlement 1701, Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, European Communities Act 1972) Far cry from rigidity in the States. Case Law (Allows judges a place to interpret Parliament Convention, Royal Prerogative (Neither are binding but are flexible and develop with time. Most notable being...

    Read More
    693 Words 3 Pages
  • Essay about If Written Constitution Is Necessary for Uk

    ...the lack of a written constitution. Many people believe that a written constitution would provide greater accountability and democracy. However, other people believe that the traditional unwritten British constitution would provide greater protection. The fact that we have pressure groups and associations such as Charter88, who are campaigning for a written constitution, show that this concept is very controversial. A constitution is a set of rules that seek to establish the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government: regulate the relationship between and among the institutions: and define the relationship between the state and the individual. There are many different types of constitution. Constitution can be codified or uncodified, unitary or federal and seen as rigid or flexible. The most common way of comparing classifying constitution is codified or uncodified. The UK is an example of an uncodified constitution whereas the USA is an example of codified constitution. This essay will show that UK should not adopt a codified constitution. A codified constitution is a constitution in which key constitutional provisions are collected within a single document, it is commonly known as...

    Read More
    1316 Words 4 Pages
  • Essay on Constitution

    ...all over the world are governed by a constitution, which underpins the laws of the country. Most countries have a written constitution while the UK distinctly possesses an unwritten constitution. A written constitution is characterized by a complete codification of all the constitutional laws and principles. That is, the constitution takes the form of a unique document. On the other hand, the unwritten constitution tends to have a bulk of the principles not codified, highly characteristic of the UK constitution. In the UK, what counts as the law is what develops from practice. Pek (2008) emphasizes that even though there are parts of the UK constitution that are codified, it is not enough to classify it as written, since there has been no collective conferring by the people. More often than not, the unwritten nature of the UK constitution has been termed as advantageous. This paper seeks to evaluate the UK constitution with respect to its unwritten characteristic and establish the advantages it has over a written constitution. The UK constitution’s unwritten nature is as a result of history and the steady evolution of principles and laws. Unlike in other states where particular consideration is given to the codification of the...

    Read More
    1426 Words 4 Pages
  • Essay on Should the Uk's Constitution Remain Uncodified?

    ...Should the UK’s constitution remain uncodfied? The UK constitution has an uncodified constitution, which means that it cannot be found in any single document unlike the USA’s constitution. Our constitution comes from a number of various sources. Some are written and the others have just been accepted by the Government, such as EU Law, as it derives from the European Union. More examples of sources include the statute law, books written by Bagehot’s “The British Constitution”, which outlined the role of the cabinet, parliament and monarch. The constitution we have gives way for many benefits and advantages that imply that it shouldn’t be altered or fully codified as this could result in major problems. Although there would be some benefits of the constitution remaining uncodified, some government ministers such as Gordon Brown who was Chancellor of the Exchequer and Prime Minister had called for the topic to be debated in Parliament back in 2006. The Liberal Democrats have also expressed their views on the topic also. To some extent there are many arguments for the British Constitution to become codified, if it was introduced it would significantly affect the power of government; the relationship between the executive and Parliament; multi-level governance;...

    Read More
    1093 Words 3 Pages

Popular Essays

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free