top-rated free essay

Should Art Be Censored?

By razznika Mar 27, 2003 820 Words
Art is supposed to be the expression of feelings, the visual representation of what the artists is feeling or trying to show. All people need to have the freedom to express opinions and feelings to the extent that is acceptable, but who is to say what is acceptable? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but who is the beholder, and who gave them the superiority to decide what is P.C or not. Rudolph Giuliani has no right to decide for a city what is acceptable or not, art is an expression of a person, and putting certain restrictions on that is like fastening someone's mouth shut.

So how to decide who puts borders on things, well Rudolph Giuliani thinks he can. Whoever is actually doing the artwork is the only one who knows the reasons behind its creation and the feelings that were present at the time. Boundaries in art are a hard thing to do, some people think the work of Damien Hirst is "sick, foul and outrageous" (Robinson 1) but the deeper meaning of this work may just not be understood by the viewer, so who says they should be able to censor it. No one is fully able to define all the borders for an artist's work, people have different tastes and opinions. For instance Giuliani goes up for re-election, "bans hot-dog vendors from midtown sidewalks [and] sells off public gardens in poor neighbourhoods to private developers", (Robinson 1) so do all these decisions make him a viable resource for judging an art exhibit. He seems to be quite against a lot of modern things, so this would give him a large bias towards more traditional art. No one is able to put full and total boundaries on any type of art, different people have different opinions, and this does not mean what is good for one person is not totally acceptable to another.

Art is not always what we expect of it, if an artist has had a very hard life and is very depressed they do not have to make a "pleasant" artwork. This kind of censorship is unacceptable, having all artwork be pleasant is giving an outline to artists and would not let the express themselves to their full extent. Artists need to be able say whatever they need to express through their artworks. It is being claimed that having an unpleasant art show in a museum is a "violat[ion] [of] a provision in its lease ... to educate, enlighten, and provide enjoyment" (Barstow 3) is the reason for museums. It is no ones rights to be able to say if these works actually do not do these three things. Artwork that is not pleasant can help educate people on the other part of humanity that we are not so familiar with. Making people only see work that is pleasant is sheltering and does not help people understand and accept world issues, these unpleasant artworks can help people understand the other part of the world that lives differently then us. This is a very important part of society, we need to be aware of unpleasant things, and some of these are best visualised through some unpleasant but very factual artworks.

No one should be able to judge artwork, they are not even qualified to do this. Being qualified for this is not something you can get, but it comes from experience. The museum in New York is just demonstrating some very interesting art works and should be commended for its bravery in doing so. The government has no right to decide that this is not good for the museum, it is worse if they give them this eviction. It is a very large museum and having it leave the city would cost it a large amount of money. Also "the museum...cannot responsibly make plans for future exhibitions" (Barstow 4) if it is under the impression that it could be evicted because that would not be fair to the donators of the artwork. Every city needs some culture, and with culture and art comes a very broad amount of feelings and opinions, having museums means that you have to be able to accept what comes with it. Some of these artworks may not be acceptable for some age groups, but this is no reason to close it down, or even challenge the museum with an eviction.

Rudolph Giuliani has no right to decide for the city what is right to show in a museum, putting borders on the artistic expression on an artists is like telling them not to do art anymore. Just because you do not agree with the content does not mean it has no value for other people to see, people need to open up and be more welcoming of new things. Being close-minded just keeps us in the same mind set and does not help anyone become a better or more enlightened person.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • ART `

    ...even when there is just a shift change. In our previous case, the disorganization or the hand off lead to one of Nightingale Community Hospital’s patient’s Tina, to be discharged to a parent who did not have custody of her, resulting in a sentinel event. 2. 1. Nightingale Community Hospital needs to repeat the steps taken to evaluate t...

    Read More
  • Should the Internet Be Censored?

    ...Ximenes 1 Should the Internet Be Censored? "No bones about it, the Internet needs to be censored". At least according to Gerry Morgan, president of an Internet contents provider and a parent, he among other non-denominational Christian parents claims that they have found "the only realistic answer to the In...

    Read More
  • should cartoon violence be censored?!

    ...Should cartoon violence be censored? “It seems today, that all you see, is violence in movies and sex on TV. But where are those good old fashion values. On which we used to rely!”(family guy theme song) speak of the devil itself. Now in to the twenty first century the primary learning school for kids aging 1 to 4 are mostly all tho...

    Read More
  • Should the Internet Be Censored?

    ...Should the Internet be censored? From colonial times to the present, the media in America has been subject to censorship challenges and regulations. The Internet has become a vast sea of opportunity. Everyone is seizing the moment. The good and the bad of society have reduced the meaning of the Internet. Menace threatens each onlooker, as p...

    Read More
  • Should the Internet Be Censored?

    ...Should the internet be censored? The internet is the last vestige of free media and press in the whole wide world. The internet is a far more powerful tool but unfortunately our politicians don’t seem to mix too well with technology and social media. Hence, I absolutely abhor the idea of a tyrannical government censoring. By censoring the i...

    Read More
  • Art assignment

    ...heaven. He also knew that in death he would be at peace and further portrays this by using bold colors in the Starry Night painting. In a letter to his brother, Theo, van Gogh comments: "I should not be surprised if you liked the Starry Night and the Ploughed Fields, there is a greater quiet about them than in the other canvases. " Later in...

    Read More
  • Should the Harry Potter series be censored?

    ... Should the Harry Potter series be censored? Should the Harry Potter series be banned from schools and libraries? I don’t think there is anybody in modern countries who hasn’t at least heard of Harry Potter and his adventures at Hogwarts School for witches and wizardry. The Harry Potter series is a widely popular children’s book. The...

    Read More
  • Should Art Museums Be Democratized?

    ...The art museum is a place that collects and preserves very valuable and profound pieces of art created by some of the most influential artists of all time. Not everyone can understand the emotions and profound ideas that are expressed in old works of art. Only a fraction of all people can really appreciate a fine work of art and understand its t...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.