Mr. Chairman, Impartial panel of judges, accurate timekeeper, fellow debaters, invited guests, Ladies and gentlemen. It gives me great pleasure to SPEAK against the motion that abortion should be legalized. I think abortion should be considered illegal..
Panel of judges, Abortion should be legal if the babies are not persons. What is the difference between a baby in the womb and a 2 year old? There are 4 basic differences; they are the size, level of development, environment, and degree of dependency.
Is a fetus a nonperson due to its size? Is a 4 foot person any less a person than a 6 foot one? No, so the size no matter what of the fetus should make the fetus or any human a nonperson.
Mr. Chairman, The second thing is level of development. Is a 17 year old more developed physically and mentally than a 2 year old? Yes. But is that 2 years old any less human? No. Level of development had nothing to due with the nature of personhood.
Thirdly is the environment. How does a change of location classify a human as a nonperson? Does moving to a new state make you not a person? So how does living in a womb make a baby not a person and quite simply it doesn't.
Fellow debaters, finally is the degree of dependency. Are diabetics living on insulin or a man living on life support make them nonpersons? Would it be right to kill them based on their condition? No, so why would it be right to murder a baby in the womb.
The abortion issue isn't about the rights of the mother. It's about the rights of the baby. Murdering a human being is never okay. Ladies and gentlemen, no matter how you look at it, killing a baby in its mother womb IS murder in the FIRST DEGREE! NO taxpayer should be paying for murder of innocent babies, they should be funding a program to HELP POOR MOTHERS care for their child, or legally put them up for adoption, Based on the evidence above I have concluded that fetuses are persons and should therefore have their own undeniable rights.
Mr. Chairman, Impartial panel of judges, accurate timekeeper, fellow debaters, invited guests, Ladies and gentlemen, I still stand by my words that abortion should not be legalized. Thank you
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
4. If we grant that a fetus is a person and thus has a right to life, why can’t we allow for abortions in cases of rape or incest?…
- 951 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The first argument and the most basic question on any discussion of abortion is whether the fetus, or unborn child, is a human person or not. On the pro-life side, people argue that the fetus is "a human within a human". In the context of biology, a fetus is “alive” as it grows in the mother’s womb by time to time due to the cell division. On the pro-choice side people tend to argue that a child can only be consider…
- 1268 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Paper #2: Jane English and the Analogy of the Hypnotized Attackers Mario P. Martinez November 6,1997 For our next paper I plan on discussing abortion as a social issue. I want to do this in the form of a critical paper This seems to be a very sticky subject and is one of the topics we had in our class that was very interesting to me with a lot of room for interpretation as to when it is or is not o.k. to abort the fetus if it should ever be done at all. The argument I plan to discuss is Jane English's analogy of the hypnotized attackers which was not one of our readings, but one I came across in some research I did for this upcoming paper.…
- 2630 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The act of abortion is morally impermissible and should not continue mainly in regards to Kantian Theory, treating the individual, the baby, as a mere means instead of an end in him or herself. Most arguments concerning abortion stem against this notion with each arguing the baby is not a true human and therefore does not count in the moral community. In On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, Mary Anne Warren defines personhood, what defines a human being, with five concepts and the need to meet the majority of them(SOURCE). Warren affirms consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, the capacity to communicate, and the presence of self- concept as the five components of personhood. Furthermore, she claims if an entity does not possess one of the five it should not be extended the moral rights as a person. Not all human beings are people. Warren labels the fetus as not a person with these criteria. On the contrary, a fetus meets more than one of the five elements, establishing him or her more so a person than others. As for the first one, the ability to detect if another being experiences pain renders itself a difficult task…
- 1405 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
An idea central to the abortion debate is personhood and when a foetus can be classed as a person. There are many different beliefs e.g. at the age of viability, at conception, at birth, when the foetus has a heartbeat etc. J Glover said that determining the point at which a foetus can be considered a person is logically impossible and to attempt to do so is like trying to define at what point a cake mix becomes a cake. Peter Singer said that a person is someone who has the ability to plan and anticipate ones future and since the foetus is unable to do this, it isn’t a person. Singer believed that the right to life is grounded in personhood and therefore abortion can be justified. However, this definition has flaws in that it fails to include babies and young children, as well as the mentally disabled, surely all of which we class as people? Mary Anne Warren suggested the following criteria to define a person;…
- 3338 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Is Abortion really murder. Give about 266 days after conception and see what emerges from the womb. It will be a human baby, not a horse, a fish or an honey badger. When a human egg and sperm unite, the result is a fetus. Within 3 week you can hear a heartbeat. At 4 weeks you are able to pick out facial features, arms and legs. Nerves and brain waves are in place by eight weeks after conception. At 12 weeks breathing of fluid for oxygen. So is this a fetus or a human? That is still up to interpretation. Legal rights have stepped in but, yet they are broken all the time.…
- 783 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
In the mid-1800s states started to pass laws making it illegal to carry out an abortion. The motivations for anti-abortion laws varied from state to state. One of the reasons included fears that the population would be dominated by the children of newly arriving immigrants, whose birth rates were higher than those of "native" Anglo-Saxon women. The real issue at hand regarding the abortion debate is not the women's rights or other factors but the status of the unborn fetus. Participants of the personal choice argument suggest that the unborn fetus is not a human being, but if the unborn child is indeed a human person, then no amount of freedom justifies its elective termination. Therefore prochoice debaters has made an argument stating the question by presupposing their conclusions, they are only plausible if and only if the unborn are not human persons.…
- 1320 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The main argument pertaining to abortion is whether or not a fetus is a "person" that is "indistinguishable from the rest of us" and if it deserves rights equal to women's. On this question there is a tremendous spectrum of religious, philosophical, scientific, and medical opinion, but it all really depends on who you ask. It's been argued for centuries. Fortunately, our society has recognized that each woman must be able to make this decision, based on her own conscience. To impose a law defining a fetus as a "person," granting it rights equal to or superior to a woman's, thinking, feeling, conscious human being, is not only arrogant but absurd. It only serves to diminish a woman's value. (Heritage House 76, Inc.)Under the view of pro choice supporters the embryo is not a baby since it can not survive and live outside the uterus since it receives everything needed to survive from the mother's body. In a sense the fetus dies but it was never living to begin with so it can not be considered an act of murder as pro-lifers would argue. More simply consider acorns and trees. (Robinson) Just as an acorn is a fertilized egg of the oak, that does not make it a tree. Sure it has the potential to become an oak tree, but it has not yet grown to that…
- 1055 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Mary Anne Warren in On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion stated the characteristics which are central to the concept of personhood which are “sentience, emotionality, reason, the capacity to communicate, self awareness, and moral agency” (Cahn 193). In Warren’s requirements, adults are placed in the “persons” category. On the other hand, fetuses are not “persons” since fetuses do not abide to Warren’s characteristics. Fetuses therefore do not have the right to life. When a person has a “right,” it indicates that the person is justified to do something. For example in a legal stance, every United States citizen has the right to vote. Therefore no one can prevent a United States citizen from voting, since the citizen is justified to vote according to United States law. In a moral stance, since an adult has a right to life and not a fetus, my mother, technically if ever placed in a situation for choosing between my mother and a fetus, deserves to live not the fetus. In addition, a “fetus” is the zygote formed upon conception. The zygote is not a person. Even though the zygote will become an adult, at this point the zygote has no rights since the zygote does not fulfill Warren’s requirements. Therefore, abortion i¬s justified since the fetus is not a “person.”…
- 851 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
the matter is whether the fetus is a living human. (2) The bottom line being, that the fetus's moral status…
- 1113 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
A dilemma is brewing for the society as a whole today in the name of abortion which has become a controversial issue that faces everyone countrywide. Abortion is defined as the forcible removal of a developing baby from the womb of his or her mother, using surgical, involuntary, or chemical means. Nowadays, abortion has been a very popular and debatable topic because of the moral and ethical issue associated with it. The most momentous moment in the history of abortion in America was the Roe vs. Wade case, which allowed the option of abortions legal to women across the nation. Today struggle still remains on the moral ethics behind it and the question is asked, “Is abortion the murder of an unborn child?” and the other question asked today is, “should abortion be declared illegal?” The debate over abortion in the United States historically holds ground both politically and socially. America is split into two sides; pro - choice and pro – life, both sides have their points that they stand on. To sum it up, either a living human is or isn’t being killed, and case between life or liberty is born. The differences make it hard to settle the two sides. Though it looks like both sides will never compromise they do share some similarities. Both sides to the abortion controversy share a common objective, which is to make abortion safer, and the overall number of abortions should reduce. There is much debate whether this is an action of life or death, and the difference is rather large. Our nation is split over the legal and moral status of abortion. The two sides of abortion, are the "pro-choice” and the "pro-life." In simple terms, a pro-choice individual believes that the choice to abort a pregnancy is to be made only by the woman; the state should not interfere. A pro-life advocate believes from the second of conception, the fetus is alive; and has rights thus abortion is the…
- 1273 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
In the 1973 case Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court proclaimed the unborn are not legally defined as people. However, the court also allows states to restrict access to abortions where fetuses are viable, this means potentially capable to survive outside the womb on their own. Pro-choice supporters argument that you cannot have two entities with equal rights in one body. As a woman and a pro-choice supporter I believe giving rights to an embryo cancels out the mother 's right to life. Pro-life supporters argument that a fertilized egg if left to grown becomes a full develop baby.…
- 1322 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It is my personal belief, that a child should be considered a person once the child has reached the third trimester of development. Although Canadian standards do not recognize a child as an actual person until they are birthed, there should be certain safeguards in place in order to protect the child, despite the fact that they have not yet been born. I am aware that there are certain provisions in place to protect unborn children, but a child that has reached the third trimester of development should be considered a “person” in my opinion, because they have reached certain developmental milestones that should classify them as such. As the textbook outlined, there have been gruesome cases in which the only right considered by the legal system…
- 475 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Abortions has been legalized since 1973, since then approximately 1,500,000 babies have been aborted a year. The babies of women who decide to kill are like an innocent person being sentenced to death for a crime they did not commit. Just as humans wish to live , and enjoy their life , sure enough the baby would like to deserve a chance at life.…
- 231 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
When a baby is aborted it is still in the process to be a fetus. The baby is tissue in the uterus, which means that the avoid would not feel any pain. Taking away the right for women to have the option of abortion would lead to more deaths because women would seek illegal abortions. In countries outside of the US, the cause of woman's death is 13% from getting illegal abortions. Before abortions were legal in the US, 265 deaths occurred in the year of 1965 because of illegal abortions. Abortions are against religions, but in US God and state are separate so there should be no religion influencing people's stance on abortion. Abortion needs to stay legal to save women's lives mentally, physically, and…
- 709 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays