Preview

shipwreck case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
shipwreck case
Government
Period: 5
Case of the Shipwrecked Sailors In the case of the Shipwrecked sailors; Dudley and Stephens are faced with charges of murder. In my opinion it is fair that they get tried, for what they did because it clearly states that:” Brooks objected refused to consent However Dudley and Stephan’s decide Brooks would die soon anyway ….After agreeing they killed and ate Brooks”. It’s clear how Brooks from the evidence says that he refused. Even though it says he agreed with them all drawing lots. That is something that they could use against Brooks. They should be convicted for their crime because they did commit a crime of the murder of Brooks and should receive the punishment for murder. To murder is: “the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another” because after all they did plan Brooks to die even if he was weak.

In the case of the Shipwrecked sailors; Dudley and Stephens are faced with charges of murder. In my opinion it is fair that they get tried, for what they did because it clearly states that:” Brooks objected refused to consent However Dudley and Stephan’s decide Brooks would die soon anyway ….After agreeing they killed and ate Brooks”. It’s clear how Brooks from the evidence says that he refused. Even though it says he agreed with them all drawing lots. That is something that they could use against Brooks. They should be convicted for their crime because they did commit a crime of the murder of Brooks and should receive the punishment for murder. To murder is: “the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another” because after all they did plan Brooks to die even if he was weak.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hussey V. Peter Belmont: The Supreme Court Case
    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hussey V. Peter Belmont: The Supreme Court Case

    Before making the final decision the court considered the following factors, length of delay, prejudiced to the accused, explanation for the delay, and Waiver of Appellants. The Supreme Court then concluded that the delay of 2 years after the appellant's preliminary trial was unreasonable. The Crown did not justify the institutional delay and did not prove that the delay prejudiced the delay of the accused. Therefore, their final decision was to set the four men free as the delay was excessive. I agree with the court's decision because the Crown did not justify the reason for the 2-year delay, which was a violation of the men's charter rights. The men were also held in custody for 6 months before being proven guilty. This to me was the right ruling of the case because no serious crime was committed when the incident occurred, and the two-year delay was not appropriate for this type of…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Flawed Executions By Herb Hanes: An Analysis
    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page

    Flawed Executions By Herb Hanes: An Analysis

    In the book the author Herb Hanes reveals information on flawed executions. In the author's case flawed executions are “executions in which public sensibilities are offended by a breakdown in routine procedures of convicting murders and putting them to death”. The authors research specifies that botched executions is too small to capture the delicacy of the executions. The paper deliberates four ways in which flawed executions are occured. “1.executions may be technically botched, 2.convicts may not play their assigned roles, 3.the prescribed solemnity of the death chamber may be compromised and irregularities in conviction and 4.sentencing may come to light”.In the paper the author uses evidence and answers specific questions in proving that…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Steven Truscott Case Essay
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Steven Truscott Case Essay

    3) If someone is convicted of a crime as heinous as murder I feel it is the right thing to do to compensate…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Research Paper On Ned Kelly Murder
    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page

    Research Paper On Ned Kelly Murder

    I, Judge Longfellow, find Ned Kelly guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter. Firstly, I have heard that at the Stringybark Creek shootout, the Kelly Gang only wanted to take the guns and horses. Ned Kelly had absolutely no intension of shooting the police but he did so in self defence. Secondly, I have heard that the Kelly family have been harassed. Whenever a cow or a horse has gone missing, the police have straight away accused Ned Kelly or someone else in his family. Finally, I have heard that Constable Fitzpatrick went into the Kelly’s house to arrest Dan Kelly without a warrant. This constant harassment has no doubt forced this young man down the path of crime. The evidence directs me to find Ned Kelly guilty of the lesser charge…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Judge Lawrence Wargrave Guilty
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Is Judge Lawrence Wargrave Guilty

    Ever since Judge Lawrence Wargrave was a child he had a thing for seeing and causing death. He had a tormented mind. He himself could not kill the innocent for that was his tragic flaw. So he found a loophole and wanted to kill the guilty, but were the people on the island were really guild of the same crime. If they were wouldn't they have been in jail or giving the death penalty. That is not at all the way Wargrave saw it he had seen people get away with murder and they deserved to die, but he was wrong. He made a…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should Lewis Powell Have A Big Punishment For Killing The President?
    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Lewis Powell Have A Big Punishment For Killing The President?

    Killing the president is a bad choice and all the people that were involved in killing the president should be punished. George Atzerodt was told and forced to kill Lincoln, but in the end he did not, but he still deserves a punishment for being part of the group that killed him, but, he should not have a big punishment like most other people. I think George Atzerodt needs to be in jail for about 3-5 years, so he would not get in another group of people and be forced to kill someone again. Lewis Powell had to murder the secretary of state seward. They all didn’t have a choice, Booth was a tough leader and he was very strict about his goal.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Billy Budd: Was Captain Vere Right?
    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Billy Budd: Was Captain Vere Right?

    death, and Captain Vere feels sorry for Billy and does not want Billy to suffer…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Lord Of The Flies Dbq Analysis
    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Lord Of The Flies Dbq Analysis

    So if they had to tell who was guilty or who's not it would go like this. Sawyer tried to kill Mars but he missed so that would be 2nd degree murder because it was intended to do and jack finished it of so Sawyer would be the guilty one because his intention was to killing him and Jack didn't want to see him suffer so he did what he had to do. So whoever tried killing piggy is guilty it was intention of murder so they are guilty.And Simon’s death was an accident because they were having self defense and they didn't know who was…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Simmons Death Penalty
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Simmons Death Penalty

    In the 1993 Missouri court case Ropers v. Simmons, Christopher Simmons (17 y/o), accompanied by his two friends Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer, devised a plan to kill Shirley Cook. The full plan was to commit burglary and homicide by breaking and entering the residence, tying up the woman, and tossing the victim off a bridge (We the People). The night of the murder the three met at midnight, Tessmer later decided to drop out of the plan. Without Tessmer, Simmons and Benjamin broke into Mrs. Crook's home, bound her hands, covered her eyes, and then drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. Although Simmons later pleaded innocence because of the evidence, leading up to the crime, Simmons had expressed to his two friends that he wanted to murder someone (Roper v. Simmons). He deliberately planned this murder for months and presented his plan to his two friends who later played a significant role in the ruling.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Bartolomeo Vanzetti Guilty
    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bartolomeo Vanzetti Guilty

    They believe that they are guilty because Vanzetti lied about the whereabouts of his friends and guns. Not only this, but he also lied about the reason he was in Bridgewater on May 5th. He stated that he had gone there to collect anarchist literature, but could not give names of anyone he went to see that day or the addresses of the places that he went. Many prosecutors believed that this was a weak explanation. With all these lies building up it started to show “consciousness of guilt.” However, I do not think that slips of the tongue or little white lies are evidence to convict and execute the two men. During the court case Vanzetti eventually told the truth. He testified, saying that he did tell lies about his gun and whereabouts because the United States was in the grip of a Red Scare. He feared for his life, of course he is not going to fully tell the truth if he thinks it will get him or his friends in some type of trouble. Aside from clearing up the lies about his guns/friends, he still stuck to his original story about why he was in Bridgewater. Defense attorney Moore started to look into the case after Vanzetti's execution. He thinks that Vanzetti had gone to Bridgewater with Sacco to pick up a car from Boda's so they could collect dynamite. Moore thinks that Vanzetti told the lie because if he had told the truth about going to collect dynamite it would have been pretty…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Law Trials Change Over Time?
    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Law Trials Change Over Time?

    In a report written in 1819, the unknown author gives the reader “a brief account of the horrid massacre of the captain, mate and supercargo” that happened in July of 1816. According to this report, four crewmembers, John Williams, John Rog, Francis Frederick, and Niles Fogelgreen, led by Williams, killed the captain and the supercargo, threw the first officer overboard, and held the second officer hostage. The ship, sailing from Baltimore to Europe, had approximately 42 thousand dollars’ worth of coffee and other valuables onboard. The crew divvied up the goods and sold them in Norway, but caused too much suspicion when they next stopped in Copenhagen, so the authorities arrested them and sent them to Boston to await trial. Their trial was open to the public, and the courtroom was full of excited…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Men After Conviction Cases
    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Men After Conviction Cases

    When looking at the case of The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens and the punishment that the two men face after conviction is one that requires a lot of thought (Brody and Acker, 2010). These two men were faced with a difficult situation that due to their being in a position of making life threating decisions that would determine if they all lived or if they all died with the sacrifice of one saving the other three men. These two men’s fate, after their criminal conviction, should be evaluated with the circumstances of the crime of murder with the intent of the two men to survive while stuck in the middle of the ocean with no way out (Gollwitzer and Keller, 2010).…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paths of Glory
    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Paths of Glory

    I would say that their trial was taken place in a Kangaroo court. Kangaroo court is…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tison vs. Arizona: Summary of Defense
    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tison vs. Arizona: Summary of Defense

    In this case, the felony-murder law is unconstitutional and Tisons cannot be executed because if they did not plan to or actually kill anyone, under the 8th Amendment, their punishment given is cruel and unusual. In Enmund v. Florida, Earl Enmund was given the death sentence for being an accessory to two murders. He later appealed and the Supreme Court ruled it was unlawful and his death sentence was vacated. The defendant’s punishment must be proportionate to the crimes they have committed and those not actually performing the murders should not be given the death sentence. We want consistency in the Supreme Court and giving the death penalty for Ricky and Raymond Tison should be uplifted because it would just not be a reasonable punishment. The 14th Amendment states, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. In the Enmund case, Earl Enmund was not given the death sentence because he did not commit any murder. It is only fair, under these circumstances, that the Tison brothers shouldn’t be given the death sentence either because they did not commit any murders. Our defendants were accessories to the murders, they aided and embedded their father and his friend, they were involved in armed robbery, kidnapping, and car theft but due to the fact that there is no evidence that the defendants intended to, attempted to, or in fact kill anyone, they do not deserve the death penalty under these conditions. We want to honor the 8th and 14th Amendment and keep uniformity in this country and that is why these two men should not receive the death sentence. There is no question these two brothers should be punished and that is why a life sentence without possibility of parole is a more…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bigger Thomas Analysis
    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bigger Thomas Analysis

    Bigger Thomas is and should be held 100 percent responsible for his actions. He did not give an iota about the lives of those two young women. In the end, the only life that mattered to Bigger was the life of Bigger Thomas. His actions caused him to take not two lives, but three. He took the life of Bessie Mears, Mary Dalton, and the one and only Bigger Thomas. There is no argument that can be found to prove Bigger Thomas not responsible for his actions. He tried to cover up the murders, and when that failed, he fled the…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics