Sharolyn Charles Case Summary

In this case, yes I do believe that Sharolyn Charles should win because all of the fees and penalties that were added up by the law firm, Lundgren and Associates were not necessary. When Check Rite referred the matter over to Lundgren, Lundgren had no right to continue to add unknown charges and send these notices to Sharolyn Charles without reasoning. For example, in the text it mentions that there are consumer protection laws and that failure to disclose all of the charges related to a consumer loan or a credit purchase would be an omission that carries rights for consumers and penalties for the business. Also mentioned in the text, consumer protection status can also provide a consumer who has been harmed by a violation of the statues may recover by his own suit against the business that acted improperly. Now, Charles was not harmed in this matter but she was violated by receiving four letters by the firm demanding she pay the settlement offer.
If it was not then there is no reason to collect debt simply because Charles used a check at restaurant. There was also no reason for Check Rite to refer this matter over to the law firm because they were not the company that the check was forwarded to in the first