Shankar Et Al 2003 Strategic Management Journal

Topics: Video game console, Empiricism, Nintendo Pages: 10 (6127 words) Published: March 20, 2015
Strategic Management Journal
Strat. Mgmt. J., 24: 375–384 (2003)
Published online 18 November 2002 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/smj.296

RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES
NETWORK EFFECTS AND COMPETITION: AN
EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HOME VIDEO GAME
INDUSTRY
VENKATESH SHANKAR1 and BARRY L. BAYUS2 *
1
Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, U.S.A.
2
Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Building on the resource-based view of the firm, we advance the idea that a firm’s customer network can be a strategic asset. We suggest that network effects are a function of network size (i.e., installed customer base) and network strength (i.e., the marginal impact of a unit increase in network size on demand). We empirically study these network effects in the 16bit home video game industry in which the dominant competitors were Nintendo and Sega. In the spirit of the new empirical IO framework, we estimate a structural econometric model assuming the data are equilibrium outcomes of the best fitting noncooperative game in price and advertising. After controlling for other effects, we find strong evidence that network effects are asymmetric between the competitors in the home video game industry. Specifically, we find that the firm with a smaller customer network (Nintendo) has higher network strength than the firm with the larger customer base (Sega). Thus, our results provide a possible explanation for this situation in which the firm with a smaller customer network (Nintendo) was able to overtake the sales of a firm with a larger network size (Sega). Copyright  2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

INTRODUCTION
In many industries, the network of consumers
using compatible products or services influences
the benefits of consumption. Positive network
effects arise when the consumer utility of using
a product or service increases with the number
of users of that product or service. The telephone system is a widely used example since Key words: network externalities; technology lock-in;
new empirical industrial organization
*Correspondence to: Barry L. Bayus, Kenan-Flagler Business
School, University of North Carolina, CB3490, Chapel Hill,
NC 27599, U.S.A.

Copyright  2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

it seems clear that the value of being part of
the network rises as the network size increases.
Consumption benefits can also arise in markets
where a large customer network leads to increases
in complementary products and services, which
in turn leads to increased consumer utility (e.g.,
see Farrell and Saloner, 1985; Katz and Shapiro,
1985). Prominent examples of industries thought
to exhibit network effects include automated bank
teller machines, computer hardware and software,
videocassette recorders, video games, and Internet
web browsers. Not surprisingly, network externalities and the implications of having a large installed customer base are receiving increased
Received 3 November 1999
Final revision received 14 August 2002

376

V. Shankar and B. L. Bayus

attention by strategy researchers (e.g., Hill, 1997;
Schilling, 2002).
As noted by Majumdar and Venkataraman
(1998), the literature related to network effects
broadly tackles three categories of research questions: (1) technology adoption decisions (e.g., what factors are related to whether and when a new
technology is adopted); (2) technology compatibility decisions (e.g., what factors influence a firm’s decision to seek compatibility); and (3) decisions
among competing incompatible technologies (e.g.,
what factors are related to consumers’ choices
among rival incompatible products within a single
product category). While theoretical research has
addressed all three of these categories, empirical
research has been limited to the first and second
categories of questions (e.g., see the review by...

References: Arthur WB. 1996. Increasing returns and the new
world of business
Balasubramanian S, Mahajan V. 2000. The economic
leverage of the virtual community
Barney J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive
advantage
Brynjolfsson E, Kemerer C. 1996. Network externalities
in microcomputer software: an econometric analysis of
David P. 1985. CLIO and the economics of QWERTY.
Economides N. 2001. Bibliography on network economics.
Farrell J, Saloner G. 1985. Standardization, compatibility
and innovation
Feld S. 1981. The focused organization of social ties.
Fudenberg D, Tirole J. 1992. Game Theory. MIT Press:
Cambridge, MA.
Gabel H. 1991. Competitive Strategies for Product
Standards
Glesjer H. 1969. A new test for heteroscedasticity.
Grindley P. 1995. Standards Strategy and Policy. Oxford
University Press: New York.
Hill C. 1997. Establishing a standard: competitive
strategy and technological standards in winner-take-all
Homans G. 1974. The Human Group. Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich: New York.
Kadiyali V, Sudhir K, Rao V. 2001. Structural analysis
of competitive behavior: new empirical industrial
Katz M, Shapiro C. 1985. Network externalities, competition and compatibility. American Economic Review
75(3): 424–440.
Majumdar S, Venkataraman S. 1998. Network effects
and the adoption of new technology: evidence
Monopolies and Mergers Commission. 1995. Video
Games: A Report on the Supply of Video Games
Moorthy S. 1993. Competitive marketing strategies. In
Handbooks in Operations Research and Management
Mueller M. 1997. Universal Service: Competition,
Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the
Rosen E. 2000. The Anatomy of Buzz . Doubleday: New
York.
Rumelt R. 1984. Toward a strategic theory of the firm.
Strat. Mgmt. J., 24: 375–384 (2003)
384
Shankar V, Bayus B. 2002. Network effects and competition: an empirical analysis of the home video
game industry
Voortman J. 1993. Curbing aftermarket monopolization.
Wall Street Journal. 1995. MCI and sprint set fresh
moves in AT&T battle: phone companies to offer
Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm.
Strat. Mgmt. J., 24: 375–384 (2003)
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on Strategic Management
  • Strategic Management Essay
  • Strategic Management Essay
  • Strategic Management Essay
  • Strategic Management Essay
  • Strategic Management And Organisational Dynamics Essay
  • strategic management Essay
  • Strategic Management Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free