Sex Differences In Ultrasonic Vocalization in Rat Pups

Topics: Gender, Sex, Human brain Pages: 8 (7579 words) Published: April 23, 2015
3276 • The Journal of Neuroscience, February 20, 2013 • 33(8):3276 –3283

Behavioral/Cognitive

Foxp2 Mediates Sex Differences in Ultrasonic Vocalization
by Rat Pups and Directs Order of Maternal Retrieval
J. Michael Bowers,1 Miguel Perez-Pouchoulen,4,5 N. Shalon Edwards,3 and Margaret M. McCarthy1,2,3 Departments of 1Physiology and 2Psychiatry, and 3Department of Pharmacology and Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, and 4Centro de Investigaciones Cerebrales and 5Doctorado en Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, 91000 Xalapa, Me´xico

The FOXP2 gene is central to acquisition of speech and language in humans and vocal production in birds and mammals. Rodents communicate via ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) and newborn pups emit distress USVs when separated from their dam, thereby facilitating their retrieval. We observed that isolated male rat pups emitted substantially more USV calls and these were characterized by a significantly lower frequency and amplitude compared with female rat pups. Moreover, the dam was more likely to first retrieve male pups back to the nest, then females. The amount of Foxp2 protein was significantly higher in multiple regions of the developing male brain compared with females and a reduction of brain Foxp2 by siRNA eliminated the sex differences in USVs and altered the order of pup retrieval. Our results implicate Foxp2 as a component of the neurobiological basis of sex differences in vocal communication in mammals. We extended these observations to humans, a species reported to have gender differences in language acquisition, and found the amount of FOXP2 protein in the left hemisphere cortex of 4-year-old boys was significantly lower than in age-matched girls.

Introduction
Effective communication between conspecifics is essential to fitness at both the individual and species level. Bird song has proven particularly valuable because of the profound sex differences exhibited by some species, leading to the discovery of the first sexually dimorphic neuroanatomical underpinnings controlling a specific behavior (Nottebohm and Arnold, 1976). Sex differences in auditory communication are prevalent in the animal kingdom (Kelley and Bass, 2010) but to date they have largely if not exclusively been identified in the context of attracting conspecific mating partners and/or defending territories. An additional critical communicative pair is the parent/offspring unit. When dependent offspring are separated from their caregiver they frequently signal their distress vocally. This is a tightly regulated contextspecific behavior that is common in a wide range of vertebrate species including birds, rodents and humans (Bell and Ainsworth, 1972; Vilberg et al., 1984; Brudzynski, 2005). To our knowledge, there has been no consideration of whether male

versus female dependents signal differently, and if so, whether this has any functional consequences.
FOXP2 is a member of the forkhead family of transcription
factors and has a highly conserved amino acid and DNA sequence Received Jan. 30, 2012; revised Dec. 6, 2012; accepted Dec. 7, 2012. Author contributions: J.M.B. and M.M.M. designed research; J.M.B., M.R.P.-P., and N.S.E. performed research; M.M.M. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; J.M.B. and M.R.P.-P. analyzed data; J.M.B. and M.M.M. wrote the paper.

This work was supported by NIH Grant R01 NS050525 to M.M.M., NIH Individual Postdoctoral Fellowship (F32) MH086258 to J.M.B., and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT 205779) of Mexico to MPP. Human tissue was obtained from the NICHD Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland. Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. J. Michael Bowers at the above address. E-mail: mbowe006@umaryland.edu.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-12.2013
Copyright © 2013 the authors 0270-6474/13/333276-08$15.00/0

as well as...

References: Amateau SK, McCarthy MM (2002) A novel mechanism of dendritic spine
plasticity involving estradiol induction of prostaglandin-E2
22:8586 – 8596. Medline
Bates E (1976) Language and context
Bates E, Benigni L, Bretherton I, Camaioni L, Volterra V (1979) The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York:
Academic.
Bell SM, Ainsworth MD (1972) Infant crying and maternal responsiveness.
(2008) The Danish Communicative Developmental Inventories: validity
and main developmental trends
Medline
Brunelli SA (2005) Selective breeding for an infant phenotype: rat pup ultrasonic vocalization (USV)
Burgdorf J, Panksepp J, Brudzynski SM, Beinfeld MC, Cromwell HC, Kroes
RA, Moskal JR (2009) The effects of selective breeding for differential
Dev Psychobiol 51:34 – 46. CrossRef Medline
Butterworth G, Morissette P (1996) Onset of pointing and the acquisition of
Ehret G (2005) Infant rodent ultrasounds—a gate to the understanding of
sound communication
Enard W, Przeworski M, Fisher SE, Lai CS, Wiebe V, Kitano T, Monaco AP,
Pa¨a¨bo S (2002) Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in
speech and language. Nature 418:869 – 872. CrossRef Medline
Fisher SE, Scharff C (2009) FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and
language. Trends Genet 25:166 –177. CrossRef Medline
Haesler S, Rochefort C, Georgi B, Licznerski P, Osten P, Scharff C (2007)
Medline
Hamson DK, Csupity AS, Gaspar JM, Watson NV (2009) Analysis of Foxp2
expression in the cerebellum reveals a possible sex difference. Neuroreport 20:611– 616. CrossRef Medline
Hofer MA, Shair H (1978) Ultrasonic vocalization during social interaction
Wohlleber E, Illig T, Bezzina CR, Franke A, Spranger S, VillavicencioLorini P, Seifert W, Rosenfeld J, et al. (2010) Identification of FOXP1
deletions in three unrelated patients with mental retardation and significant speech and language deficits
Medline
Huttenlocher J Haight W, Bryk A, Seltzer M, Lyons T (1991) Early vocabulary growth: relation to language input and gender
248. CrossRef
Kelley DB, Bass AH (2010) Neurobiology of vocal communication: mechanisms for sensorimotor integration and vocal patterning
Konopka G, Bomar JM, Winden K, Coppola G, Jonsson ZO, Gao F, Peng S,
Preuss TM, Wohlschlegel JA, Geschwind DH (2009) Human-specific
Krause J, Lalueza-Fox C, Orlando L, Enard W, Green RE, Burbano HA, Hublin JJ,
Ha¨nni C, Fortea J, de la Rasilla M, Bertranpetit J, Rosas A, Pa¨a¨bo S (2007)
The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neanderthals. Curr Biol 17:1908 –1912. CrossRef Medline
Lai CS, Fisher SE, Hurst JA, Vargha-Khadem F, Monaco AP (2001) A
forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature 413:519 –523. CrossRef Medline
Li S, Weidenfeld J, Morrisey EE (2004) Transcriptional and DNA binding
activity of the Foxp1/2/4 family is modulated by heterotypic and homotypic protein interactions. Mol Cell Biol 24:809 – 822. CrossRef Medline
Maccoby E (1966) The development of sex differences
MacDermot KD, Bonora E, Sykes N, Coupe AM, Lai CS, Vernes SC, VarghaKhadem F, McKenzie F, Smith RL, Monaco AP, Fisher SE (2005) Identification of FOXP2 truncation as a novel cause of developmental speech
and language deficits
McCarthy MM, Arnold AP (2011) Reframing sexual differentiation of the
brain
J. Neurosci., February 20, 2013 • 33(8):3276 –3283 • 3283
Meyer A, Zardoya R (2003) Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny
P, Geschwind DH (2011) Regulation of MET by FOXP2, genes implicated in higher cognitive dysfunction and autism risk. J Neurosci 31:
11437–11442
Newbury DF, Monaco AP (2010) Genetic advances in the study of speech
and language disorders
Nottebohm F, Arnold AP (1976) Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas
of the songbird brain
Fisher SE, Shendure J, Eichler EE (2011) Exome sequencing in sporadic
autism spectrum disorders identifies severe de novo mutations
43:585–589. CrossRef Medline
Ozc¸alis¸kan S, Goldin-Meadow S (2010) Sex differences in language first appear in gesture
Pinker S (1994) The language instinct: how the mind creates language. New
York: Harper Perennial.
Ptak SE, Enard W, Wiebe V, Hellmann I, Krause J, Lachmann M, Pa¨a¨bo S
(2009) Linkage disequilibrium extends across putative selected sites in
FOXP2. Mol Biol Evol 26:2181–2184. CrossRef Medline
Ramer A (1976) Syntactic styles in emerging language
Schulz SB, Haesler S, Scharff C, Rochefort C (2010) Knockdown of FoxP2
alters spine density in Area X of the zebra finch
740. CrossRef Medline
Simpson AP (2009) Phonetic differences between male and female speech.
Lang Linguist Compass 3:621– 640. CrossRef
Teramitsu I, Kudo LC, London SE, Geschwind DH, White SA (2004) Parallel FoxP1 and FoxP2 expression in songbird and human brain predicts
functional interaction. J Neurosci 24:3152–3163. CrossRef Medline
Teramitsu I, Poopatanapong A, Torrisi S, White SA (2010) Striatal FoxP2 is
Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary
the sex ratio of offspring
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Sex Differences Essay
  • Sex Differences Essay
  • Essay on Pup Pup Pup Pup
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Sex Difference in Evolutionary Psychology Essay
  • Difference Between Sex and Gender Essay
  • Sex Differences in Mongolian Gerbils Essay
  • Essay on Psychology Sex differences and personality

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free