Preview

Serial Killer

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Serial Killer
Kerri Geiser
Shaun Reno
English 101
29 April 2013
Commentary
Audience- College Sports Fans When you think about college sports, you don 't think about the athletes who work hard for their school and hard for themselves to achieve the goal of winning their games. But these athletes, in my opinion, work to hard to not get paid for what they do. I believe that college athletes should get paid because of the amount of work put into it, the fact their name and likenesses are used in video games, the time they take out of their lives for the sport and because they work twice as hard as a person who just works and gets paid. College athletes work hard for the sport they play. They go to practices, games, scrimmages, and probably play in their free-time to improve themselves. The practices for most are pretty long and take a lot out of a person. An average game is anywhere from an hour to an hour and a half, and that is a long time to be running around constantly with minimal breaks. Scrimmages are just extra games for the athletes to improve against other players. There are many arguments over the topic of paying college athletes. Supporters of paying college athletes say that the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) makes billions of dollars from the athletes and that the players should be compensated (““Paying College Athletes””). Boyce Watkins, a finance professor at Syracuse University, argues, ““If what you do earns money, then you have the right to negotiate...for your share. When Tom Cruise makes a film, he gets paid quite well. He doesn 't get the money because he 's a nice guy, he gets paid because he is generating revenue for someone else. That 's how capitalism works””(““PCA””). Ron Barce, a Boston College football player, says playing college sports is like a job. They get up early, work out, meetings, class and practice. They 're giving up a big chunk of their life and sees no reason they shouldn 't be paid (““PCA””). Critics of



Cited: ““Paying College Athletes”” Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 21 June 2010. Web. 10 Apr 2013. "Why College Athletes Deserve Six-Figure Salaries." The Week. N.p., 14 Sept 2011. Web. 10 Apr 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marcus Miller Mrs. Johnson Composition 2 4 November 2014 Annotated Bibliography Bennett, Dashiell. “Only 22 Of 120 Division I Athletic Programs Made Money Last Year.” Business Insider. Business Insider, Inc., 15 Jun. 2011. Web. 28 Oct 2014.This supports Frank Crumley’s claim that most athletic programs “work in the red.” The author also shows how football is the big money maker. Not all departments can pay their players. Therefore, it would be unfair for departments that can pay their players to do so. The figures come from the NCAA annual report of revenue and expenses for Division I sports. This is one of my main arguments against paying football players.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Pay for Play

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There have been ongoing arguments over the past decade of whether or not college athletes should be paid to play. Many argue that they do not have time to get real jobs because the requirements for the sport that they participate in are far too demanding. Others cite that these athletes are provided full scholarships to attend the schools at which they are playing the sport. However regardless of the argument, I still feel that college athletes should not be paid to play.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pay for Play

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages

    College Athletes: Pay for Play? Ever since the National Collegiate Athletic Association was formed in 1905, their role in regulating intercollegiate athletics has involved many different tasks. These tasks include making athletics safe in order to prevent injury, marketing athletic events, regulating and changing rules in order to make college sports more fun for the fans, and enforcing the key principle of college sports: amateurism. Amateurism in college athletics means that athletes are unpaid. As a result, the NCAA has had to deal with deciding how to handle issuing and assigning monetary value of scholarships and grants. However, the NCAA has not had to manage the debate over college athletes getting paid to play. In a day where more and more college athletes are leaving college early to enter the professional leagues it is time to ask a question: Should division-I college athletes get paid? The question is based on the assumption that there is a place for college athletics within a university. The NCAA should be looked at economically because the universities within it generate profits through their athletic departments and operate as businesses by assessing costs, revenues, etc. With that assumption established, because of the market inefficiency and exploitative characteristics of the NCAA, division-I college athletes should get paid in a free-market environment. Division-I college athletes recognize that they are exploited and receiving a scholarship worth less than their market value, so they have no incentive to not cheat and accept illegal payments.…

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After doing some research over a year ago and taking another look at this issue now, the question about paying college athletes has stayed the same. The debate whether to pay college athletes or not arose in the 1980s after Southern Methodist University was caught paying football players for their services. Upon discovery of these infractions, SMU was administered the “death penalty”, including loss of scholarships and no participation in bowl games for five years. The controversy surrounding paying college athletes seems to have risen from this unfortunate circumstance and has been cultivated into a huge social topic today. Following the SMU scandal in the late 1980s the NCAA rewrote their guidebook that describes an athlete’s role in an academic institution. According to the NCAA, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (NCAA.com). Looking at the arguments made by the NCAA, they make a valid point in showing how athletes are “compensated” for their participation in sports. According to the NCAA, “Many [athletes] receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Introduction The notion of paying college athletes has been an ongoing and controversial debate for student-athletes, coaches, schools, media and most certainly the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Many would argue that playing major college sports is more like a job versus an extracurricular activity. As with the majority of many student athletes, some attend college with the aspiration of becoming professional players thereby college is seen as a means to end. Although student-athletes already receive compensation via full and partial scholarships to participate at the college level, passionate conversations will continue to be a topic of debate because of the enormous revenue generated by college sports.…

    • 3400 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Dilemma to Pay College Athletes The United States is the only country in the world that hosts big-time sports at institutions of higher learning. This should not, in and of itself, be controversial. What has become debatable is whether college athletes of high revenue-producing sports deserve to receive compensation for being the basis of a billion dollar business. In other words, do certain college athletes deserve to be paid to play? Although this may seem like a good idea to some, it ignores already existing compensations to players as well as other dilemmas that would arise if players were to be paid. Despite the amount of money universities generate because of their student athletes, pay for play would be wrong.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    CaDerius Andrews Ms.Teague Eng.102 30 April 2014 Are college athlete’s players or employees? The idea of paying a college athlete appears to be outrageous to some. The thought of giving someone money for something they have chosen to do may not appear to be fair. The greatest concern is where to draw the line. Should the decision be based on the amount of money and fame the program generates? Why should athletes be treated special and receive compensation for their contribution to the school? One major factor is that athletes make numerous sacrifices beyond that of a nonathletic student. Many athletes can’t seek employment to help offset the expenses of college because they are on the field or court for the majority of their day. Their time and effort is devoted to that of the school, thus potentially sacrificing their education. In many cases, athletes don’t receive funding for college, which means that not only are they paying financially, but physically to compete. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. If the athletes are fortunate enough to receive a scholarship, usually that is the only benefit. This in turn leads to taking out loans and having to look for other scholarships or sources of compensation, but this doesn’t stop them from being involved in the teams’ activities. The real question is why shouldn’t an athlete in college be paid to play? College athletes are the real moneymakers for the school, and they should be paid to play.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    March 29, 2012 English 112 (B) Research Paper 1 Should We Pay College Athletes? Should we pay college athletes? That is a big topic in NCAA sports right now. People think that college athletes work hard and that they deserve to get paid. Michael Wilbon is one of these people. At first he was against paying college athletes, but now he is all for it. He says that he is interested in seeing the people that make revenue share a little piece of it. Then you have people like a reporter from the Daily Evergreen. He is against paying the athletes. He states that when you are a student athlete it is student first and athlete second, and that if you start paying college athletes it will put being an athlete first. I strongly think that college athletes shouldn’t be paid for playing sports in college. Paying players to play sports in college can cause players to ruin their career, cause the NCAA to be one sided, and would take away scholarships.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should College Athletes Get Paid to Play “It’s Time for College Athletes to Get Paid”, an article written by AJ Enno, examines college athletics are a key source of income, and they attract students to their colleges. The article states, universities depend on their athletes to produce and maintain the popularity of their school's name. He acknowledges college athletes are supposed to be the best of the best on that level, so this is why they should get paid. Enno also states, college athletes make enough money for universities that it would not hurt to give some back. So while the coaches get paid more than the President of the United States does, players sit back and have to be content with the sweat off their back as payment. He identifies, without the players coaches would not get paid as much as they do, and nobody goes to see a college game to see the coach in action, they go to see the players. Enno discusses, these athletes are practicing one half of the day and going to school the second half; there is no extra time for them to hold a job. It’s sad that people play video games with these players’ in the games, but they can’t collect any type of paycheck from game publishers; but the NCAA does. “It’s Time for College Athletes to Get Paid”, concludes that college sports will always be a big money maker for big time universities and colleges and they should take better care of their athletes by paying them for their…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paying NCAA Athletes

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thesis: As the popularity, and revenue continues to grow in college sports, the debate will be taken to new heights about whether or not college athletes are being exploited, and if they should be compensated monetarily.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: 1. http://www.thesportjournal.org/article/pointcounterpoint-paying-college-athletes 2. Let’s Start Paying College Athletesby Joe Nocera (Dec. 30th 2011, NY Times)…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For years the question, “Should college athletes be paid?” has appeared in the debatable world. College athletes across the nation have argued that they deserve compensation for the particular sport in which they participate in. “We deserve a check for what we do,” Southern Miss football player, Urell Johnson stated. “Win or lose, our sport is our job. We work all day, every day. If you think about it, the athletic department brings in the most revenue to the university.” Non-athletes, such as students (like myself) and faculty, have disagreed with the idea of reimbursing athletes who are still in college. Paying college athletes would be absurd, being that it would be too expensive, produce avaricious athletes, and most of all, it would be injustice to every other young adult attending college.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Should College Athletes Be Paid To Play?." Diverse: Issues In Higher Education 28.10 (2011): 12-13. ERIC. Web. 18 Sept. 2013.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Horne, L. (2008, October 4) Why College Players Should Not Get Paid To Play. Bleacher Report. Retrieved…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletics is a billion-dollar industry with revenue generated from hard-working, unpaid athletes. A college sport competition, such as football, basketball, and baseball, can be found on the television, radio, and Internet, almost every day. Intercollegiate athletics generate amazing ratings and revenue for both the media and universities due to their immense popularity in the United States. College athletics are big business and big money. In spite of this, the topic of paying college athletes is an extremely controversial topic. In fact, the “recent explosion of revenues flowing to NCAA member institutions and the relative pittance going to the primary input – the players…have created growing unease over the distribution of the [revenue]”…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays