Top-Rated Free Essay

Separation of Powers

Good Essays
The functions of the government are vast and varied. It is necessary to entrust these functions to specific organs, so that the responsibility for performing these functions may be effectively fixed. The division of governmental power under any constitutions may be of two kinds; the functional division such as legislative, executive and judicial and the territorial division of federalism. Thus structurally considered government consists of three branches having for their functions (i) legislation or law meaning (ii) their execution or administration and (iii) interpretation of these laws. The three branches to which these functions belong are known as the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary respectively.

Political liberty in a state is possible when restraints are imposed on the exercise of these powers. The functions of the government should be differentiated and assigned to separate organs to limit each section to its own sphere of action. So that these organs independently interact between themselves. This is what is known as the theory of separation of powers. Montesquieu, the celebrated French Scholar asserted that concentrated power is dangerous and leads to despotism of government. As a check against this danger he suggested to separate the functions of executive, legislature and the judiciary so that one may operate as a balance against the other.

However Montesquieu was not the first scholar to develop the theory of separations of powers. Its origin can be traced back to Aristotle, the father of Political Science. Of course he did not discuss the issue in great details. He only analysed the functions of the three branches of government, the deliberative, executive and the judiciary without suggesting their separation. Besides many other philosophers at a later stage from thirteenth century onwards gave some attention to the theory of separation of powers. Jean Bodiri one of the earliest thinkers of the modern period sees the importance of separating the executive and judicial powers.

But actually it acquired greater significance in eighteenth century. John Locke was one of the eighteenth century philosophers to pay greater attention to the problems of concentration of governmental power. He argued that the executive and legislative powers should be separate for the sake of liberty. Liberty suffers when the same human being makes the law and executed them.

The Theory :

Montesquieu, the noted political philosopher of France is regarded as the chief architect of the principles of Separation of powers. He in his book "The Spirit of Laws" published in 1748 gave the classic exposition of the idea of separation of powers. During his days the Bouborne monarchy in France had established despotism and the people enjoyed no freedom. The monarch was the chief law giver, executor and the adjudicator. The statement by Louis XIV that 'I am the state' outlined the character and nature of monarchial authority. Montesquieu, a great advocate of human dignity, developed the theory of separation of powers as a weapon to uphold the liberty of the people. He believed that the application of this theory would prevent the overgrowth of a particular organ which spells danger for political liberty. According to him every man entrusted with some power is bound to misuse it. When the executive and the legislative powers are given to the same person there can be no liberty.

Because it is apprehended that the same person may enact oppressive laws to execute them whimsically. Again there is no liberty, if the judicial power is not separated from the legislature and executive. If the judicial and legislative powers are exercised jointly the life and liberty of the subjects could be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge could then be the legislator. If it joined to the executive power the judges might behave with violence and oppression. If the same person or body of persons exercise these three powers that of enacting laws, executing them and of trying the cases of individuals, he maintained, that could spell the doom of the whole system of governance.

In simple words Montesquieu's view is that concentration of legislative, executive and judicial functions either in one single person or a body of persons results in abuse of authority and such an organisation becomes tyrannical. He argued that the three organs of government should be so organized that each should be entrusted to different persons and each should perform distinct functions within the sphere of power assigned to it.

Disadvantages :

Government is an organic unity. The various parts are closely interwoven. Therefore absolute separation of powers is both impossible and undesirable. In every modern government the executive has some kind of law making power to fill the gaps in the structure. Finer observes that rule making is no more or less than secondary legislation. The legislature in almost every country has to perform some judicial function by way of trying of impeachments.

Maclver feels that this theory of separation of powers leads to isolation and disharmony. The various branches of the government tend to exhibit a sense of understanding and cooperation to achieve its end when they work together. But when they are separated to carry on exclusive work of their branch they become arrogant and refuse to work with other branches of government. This gives rise to lot of administrative complications. Every branch suffers from the vice of exclusiveness leading to loss of cooperation and harmony producing inefficiency of the government.

The theory of separation of powers which upholds the system of checks and balances for the sake of equality of powers is based an wrong assumptions. It is not possible to accept the view that all organs of government mutually check each other.

The theory also makes the mistakes in assuming that all the three branches of government are equally powerful. But precisely this is not the case. With the growth of positive states the legislature has been reduced to a subordinate position paving way for the executive supremacy which largely restricts and regulates the former.

'Finally, the relationship between public liberty and separation of powers is not very significant. Liberty of the individuals largely depends on the psyche of the people, their outlook, the existing institutions, traditions, customs and political consciousness. The people of Great Britain are not less free than that of U.S.A. because there is less separation of powers in the former.

Yet however the theory of separation of powers is not altogether without any significance. The complexity of modern society and the accepted concepts of a welfare a state demand more and more action and service on the part of the government. The crux of the problem of modern government is to find a synthesis combining the answer to two needs, the need for the welfare of the state and the need for freedom for the people.

The welfare state assumes concentration of power on the executive level and consequently supremacy of the executive over the legislative branch. Of course it becomes alarming unless controlling and balancing devices are properly developed to keep pace with the ever changing face of the executive power. The doctrine of separation of powers from that point of view because more important today that perhaps any other time.

Points to Remember

Montesquieu developed the theory of separation of powers. He pointed out that the legislative, executive and judicial powers of government should be vested in three separate organs. They should not be concentrated in the hands of one man or a group of men.

Advantages

i) Separation of powers according to Montesquieu is the best guaran­tee of the liberty of people.

ii) Separation of power promotes efficiency in the administration.

Criticism

i) Complete separation of powers is neither possible nor desirable.

ii) Separation of powers is likely to lead to inefficiency in adminis­tration.

iii) The theory is based on the supposition that all the three organs of the government are equality important, but in reality it is not so.

iv) Liberty of the people largely depends more on factors like their psyche, political culture, consciousness, and institutions than separa­tion of powers

this is sept of power

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Separation of Powers

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (as above) explores the concept of the ‘separation of powers’ doctrine and how this is embedded within the ‘Commonwealth Constitution’. It also states that Australia is a ‘constitutional democracy’. To address the meaning of this statement it is important to separate the statement into individual questions. What is a constitutional democracy? What is the doctrine of separation of powers? And lastly, what are the three parts that make up the separation of powers doctrine, and how does this operate in…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Separation of Powers Over two hundred twenty years ago our great fathers brought forth a nation built on the ideal that freedom is meant for all mankind. Although their actions may have been flawed, the proposed idea was profound and beautiful in nature. In 1776 the United States of America had succeeded from Great Britain and thirteen years later our constitution went into effect (Rodgers 109). This incredible and inspiring piece of writing is much more than a piece of parchment with ink scratched…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "The 'separation of powers ' is incomplete within the current unwritten UK constitution." The ‘separation of powers’ is doctrine of the UK constitution first termed by Montesquieu, a French political philosopher, in his 1748 book De l 'esprit des lois (The Spirit of the Laws) he argues that there are three bodies of government – the executive, legislature and judiciary – which each have a discrete area of power with clear functions that no other body can imitate: this is true ‘separation of powers’…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    SEPARATION OF POWERS

    • 2870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    SEPARATION OF POWERS & JUDICIAL ACTIVISM The doctrine of Separation of Powers deals with the mutual relations among the three organs of the Government namely legislature, executive and judiciary. The origin of this principle goes back to the period of Plato and Aristotle. It was Aristotle who for the first time classified the functions of the Government into three categories viz., deliberative, magisterial and judicial. Locks categorized the powers of the Government into three parts namely: continuous…

    • 2870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances So how does the U.S. Constitution provide for a system of separation of powers and check and balances? According to our lesson 3 Congress lecture, our Founding Fathers foresaw that the Congress would be the most central branch of government, even if our U.S. Constitution provides for “separation of powers” and “checks and balances”. In addition, James Madison and others who feared that the Congress would have too much power, decided to settle on the proposal…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ‘The separation of powers, as usually understood, is not a concept to which the United Kingdom constitution adheres.’ The doctrine of separation of powers was perhaps most thoroughly explained by the French Jurist Montesquieu (1989), who based his analysis on the British Constitution of the early 18th century. This essay will discuss the doctrine of separation of powers, its meaning and importance within the United Kingdom’s un-codified constitution. It will analyse the relationship between…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Separation of powers

    • 14596 Words
    • 59 Pages

    1) The separation of powers, often imprecisely used interchangeably with the trias politica principle,[1] is a model for the governance of a state (or who controls the state). The model was first developed in Ancient Greece and Rome. Under this model, the state is divided into branches, each with separate and independent powers and areas of responsibility so that the powers of one branch are not in conflict with the powers associated with the other branches. The normal division of branches is into…

    • 14596 Words
    • 59 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Separation of Powers/Checks and Balances • Analyze how the U.S. Constitution implements separation of powers and checks and balances. Briefly explain why the constitutional framers based the new government on these ideas. Evaluate how separation of powers and checks and balances are working out in practice, today, justifying your assessments with persuasive reasoning and examples. “The ancient political philosophers, particularly Aristotle, believed that a successful republic could best be…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The “Separation of Powers” prevents tyranny within government. Each branch has certain responsibilities preventing too much power within the president or one specific branch. For example the legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch passes or denies the law, and the judicial decides if the law is constitutional or not. If “Separation of Powers” were to not be in place one ruler ( President/King ) or branch would take charge in power and in past experiences they have found that form…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages

    is to defend the assertion that separation of power in Zambia is relative. This essay will begin by giving a brief description of the concept Separation of Powers. executive, legislature and the judiciary. Thereafter, a Main Body shall provide a detailed discussion over the assertion after which a conclusion will be given to summarise the discussion. According to the online business dictionary, Separation of Powers is a constitutional principle that limits the powers vested in any person or institution…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays