The House of Lords in Salomon v Salomon1 affirmed the legal principle that, upon incorporation, a company is generally considered to be a new legal entity separate from its shareholders. The court did this in relation to what was essentially a one person company. Windeyer J, in the High Court in Peate v Federal Commissioner of Taxation,2 stated that a company represents:…
Corporation charters – Access to investment capital & protection of limited liability [Captains of Industry &/or Robber Barons]…
Corporations exist in part to shield the personal assets of shareholders from personal liability for the debts or actions of a corporation. Unlike a general partnership or sole proprietorship in which the owner could be held responsible for all the debts of the corporation, a corporation traditionally limited the personal liability of the shareholders. The limits of…
References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…
The course will cover the structure and governance of the corporation and the division of corporate powers; the duties and liabilities of directors and other officers; the remedies available to shareholders for the enforcement of director’s duties and protection against oppression or overreaching by controllers. The course considers these legal doctrines and theoretical perspectives as they relate to both public corporations and to small incorporated businesses.…
1. The Salomon case establishes that an incorporated company is a separate legal entity from its participants, namely founders, shareholders, directors, employees and agents. Consequently, a company could enter into contracts in its own rights and possess assets and liabilities distinct from its members. In legal terminology, this rule is referred to as the ‘corporate veil’.…
The purpose of this paper is to discuss my personality type based on result from Jungian 16-Type personality assessment and will discuss in detail about my type, an ISTJ, and how it relates to an organization. Organizations consist of people who differ from one another in almost every dimension possible. Diversity certainly is a challenge that is here to stay. To manage the diversity it is of utmost importance to understand personality and related behavior. Equally important is to understand one’s own personality type. A study of personality becomes relevant to find that an individual’s functioning is affected by how one relates to the world, how one processes information, evaluates the environment and finally making decisions (Kroeger, Thuesen, & Rutledge, 2002). In the present paper an attempt is made to understand my personality type and its relationship with role efficacy.…
Personality and perception are large factors in the workplace. Both should be understood by a manger to increase their awareness of how each impact the dynamics of the workplace. “Personality is defined as a relatively stable set of characteristics that influence an individual’s behavior” (OB, Pg.84), personality is a complex subject matter. In my experience, personality tests have been completed to help sum up these complex set of characteristics into a personality type. Individuals are then trained to “flex” to other personality types. Additionally, they are educated why a particular individual may react differently than others in the same situation. Making individuals aware of the personality differences has been helpful; however, personality is closely tied to perception, as well.…
The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s124, also outlines the legal capacity and powers of a company. S 124(1) states, “ a company has the legal capacity and power of an individual both in and outside this jurisdiction”. A company can also be held primarily3 or secondarily4 accountable for torts and crimes. To think of a corporation as solely an instrument of business, fails to account for social changes, which has taken place over the past century. 5 It is therefore vital that…
Over a century ago the English Courts established the basic principle of separate corporate personality: “the corporation has a separate existence from the shareholder” per Vaughan Williams J in Salomon v Salomon1. A distinct legal personality can “own and deal with property, sue and be sued in its own name and contract on its own behalf.2”…
CAPITAL LTD, an analysis into the division of powers between the members of a company and its board of directors was completed as well as the protection of interests of a company’s creditors. This case touched on these two issues in the context of reduction of capital under section 256B of the Corporations Act (2001).…
Case List – BUSL301 The following list is a guide only – the cases that are most likely to be mentioned in lectures are bolded – most of the cases in this list (or other cases that may be mentioned) will be referred to in one or both of your texts – it is very likely that in the normal course of your reading you will come across these cases – note that cases not on this list, particularly relevant recent cases, may also be discussed in class – how to use cases and what is expected of students in relation to their knowledge of cases will be explained in lectures. LECTURE AREA 1 - COMPARISON OF BUSINESS ORGANISATIONS Cases concerning partnership: Polkinghorne v Holland (1934) 51 CLR 143 National Commercial Banking Corp of Australia Ltd. v Batty (1986) 160 CLR 251 United Dominions Corporation Ltd. v Brian Pty Ltd. (1985) 157 CLR 1 LECTURE AREA 2 - HISTORY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK, REGISTRATION AND TYPES OF COMPANIES Relevant cases regarding the development of companies legislation in Australia Huddart Parker v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330 Strickland v. Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd (1971) 45 ALJR 485 NSW v Commonwealth (1990) 169 CLR 482 Re Wakim (1999) ACLC 1055 R v Hughes (2000) 171 ALR 155 The company as a separate legal entity Salomon v Salomon [1897] AC 22 Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961] AC 12 Macaura v. Northern Assurance Co Ltd. [1925] AC 619 Trustee companies: Broomhead (JW) (Vic) Pty Ltd v JW Broomhead Pty Ltd (1985) 3 ACLC 355 Lifting of the Corporate Veil: Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] Ch 935 Creasey v Breachwood Motors Ltd (1992) 10 ACLC 3,052 LECTURE AREA 3 - THE COMPANY CONSTITUTION AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND OUTSIDERS The company constitution Allen v Gold Reefs of West Africa Ltd [1900] 1 Ch 656 Gambotto v WCP Ltd (1995) 13 ACLC 342 Grey Eisdell Timms v Combined Auctions Pty Ltd (1995) 13 ACLC 965 Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd v Coopers Brewery Ltd [2006] FCAFC 144 Tortious, statutory and criminal liability of a company Tesco…
• Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law, Even if you do not purchase a copy of this book it is highly recommended that you read this comprehensive coverage of modern company law.…
*Note: Unless otherwise mentioned, all sections mentioned in this essay are from the Corporations Act1.…
[ 6 ]. Professor Robert Baxt AO, Law Book Co, Thomson Reuters, 2011, Corporation Legislation…