My theory for the reasoning of punishment has two main goals which are to provide justice for the victims and a lesson to the convicted. When a judge sits in preparation to initiate sentencing they have to go through numerous thought processes because of the uniqueness of every case. Considerations such as what are they trying to accomplish with the punishment and who would benefit from such a sentence. General factors like the age of the convicted and the heinousness of the crime committed matters as well. When a criminal is sentence it is reasoned by retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, or rehabilitation.…
In the murder of Uma Opee Mr. Dents is found guilty in the following elements. The elements are Homicide, assault of a police officer, kidnapping, burglary and crimes related to drugs.…
The approaches used to address the crime problem seen in America are subject to political influences (Travis; Walker). Celebrated cases, such as those of Megan Kanka and Polly Klaas, can put extreme political pressure on legislatures to take extraordinary measures to control or prevent crime (Walker). In addition, the local evening news in most metropolitan areas begins each night with stories on the murders, rapes, and assaults that had occurred in the community. This sets the public perception of the incidence of crime in the community and can likewise lead to political pressures coming to bear on the lawmakers to better control crime.…
Deterrence is the first punishment philosophy. Deterrence is the philosophy that if fear of punishment for committing crimes is present, then crimes are less likely to be committed. Deterrence in today's society is more for police and their presence in the community to prevent or slow down crime. The idea of deterrence also can be helped through punishment of crimes to be carried out swiftly and being a punishment that will make others think twice before committing the same crime. With the philosophy of deterrence, people are going to be less likely to commit a crime if they are more than likely going to be caught committing the crime, and they will be punished for committing the crime. The adult court systems rely on deterrence to come from punishments people found guilty are sentenced to. Punishments should fit the crime and when punishments are severe, most people will reconsider committing the same crime in fear that incarceration will result. Juvenile courts use the threat of punishment as a deterrent for minors that commit crimes.…
The purpose of punishment is paramount for the protection of society. Sentencing is traditionally the means in which the state and the community punish the offender for the crime they have committed. For a sentencing to occur the judge or magistrate may try to fulfil punishment objectives such as: incapacitation which is needed to protect society by removing the offender from society. Deterrence which tries to inhibit an individual offender as well as sending a message to the community that criminal behaviour is unacceptable and will be punished. Rehabilitation which tries to change the behaviour of the offender so that they will not re-offend. Retribution can be seen as the most important factor in sentencing. The impact of the crime will reflect on society, thus retribution encompasses the notion that the punishment should fit the crime. This is the most important factor of sentencing. The judge or magistrate has to consider the particular sentence to provide for the accused. THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURES) ACT 1999 (NSW) lays down the allowable purpose of sentencing in s 3A of the act, this act is cost efficient to society and requires no additional resources to enforce its guidelines. An example of the purpose of punishment incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation and retribution is evident in the case Regina v Milat February 1998 where Ivan Milat was sentenced seven consecutive life sentences plus eighteen years. The punishment was given primarily on…
The Effects Of Punishment And Sentencing The effects of punishment and sentencing The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are; retribution, this philosophy is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered, deterrence, this strategy is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender. Incapacitate is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal…
In summary if people such as Sable were given fair sentencings for their crimes less people could be in jail which would save state tax dollars to be put into schools and hospitals. People get extreme sentencings for the crimes they commit which are not deserving of them, more people should get the chance to be put on parole and show that they can positively contribute to their community. It is important to help people create a better life for themselves if they are willing to work and commit themselves to it. When someone fails at something they need to be picked up and given a second chance to show they can do better just as many prisoners need. The Prison-Industrial Complex System receives millions of citizens’ tax dollars to…
The second philosophical reason for sentencing is deterrence. To deter is to encourage something through fear. In this case, if you fear losing your freedom, one is encouraged to obey the law. Deterrence not only looks for retribution but also looks to punish the defendant to a point whereas they would not have a desire to commit another crime. Deterrence can take two forms, general and specific. The general deterrence punishes the criminal, dissuading them from committing the same crime.…
Philosophies of Punishment: Retribution David A. Gonzales California State University, Fullerton According to the book, Criminal Law and Punishment, written by Joel Samaha, the characteristics of punishment include pain or unpleasant consequences, punishment prescribed by the law, punishment administered intentionally and punishment administered by the state (Samaha 22). The two sole purposes of punishment are prevention and retribution. The five philosophies of punishment include retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restitution. Retribution is the best at exemplifying the philosophy of punishment.…
Goals of Sentencing There are five goals of sentencing: punishment, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restitution. Punishment, also called retribution is society’s way of getting revenge on a criminal for the harm they have caused. Retribution is society’s way of getting revenge or feeling like they got even with a criminal. In society a crime not only harms the victim of a crime, but society as well. A criminal’s injurious actions may outrage society as a whole. This creates the longing for revenge, and punishing the criminal is a way to satisfy that want. Its purpose is to punish a criminal based on a perceived need for justice. Retribution is society’s way of punishing the offender for anti-societal behavior. Punishment “is justified because it makes the offender give up money, personal freedom or comfort that is equivalent to the harm or loss done to others” (Sociological Index, 2010). Historically, punishment was immediate, often without due process, and was given little thought as to whether the punishment fit the crime. Death and exile were commonly imposed sentences. In today’s society, retribution is similar to the just deserts model of sentencing; which believes the offender deserves the punishment they get, and that punishment should fit the crime, and should be appropriate to the type and severity of the crime committed. Punishment has both favorable and unfavorable consequences. We punish our children to teach them right from wrong, because we want to raise law abiding citizens. We punish criminals to teach them what law abiding behavior is and what are criminal behaviors in our society; also, that these behaviors will not go unpunished. Punishment is the correctional goal that “emphasizes the infliction of pain or suffering” (Seiter 2008, p. 28). It is through the painful consequences of punishment that these behaviors are deterred. Punishment is necessary to deter criminal behavior, and “the presence of punishment…
Once a person is convicted of a crime by a guilty plea, plea bargain, or jury verdict the sentencing takes place. A sentence is a decree of punishment. This punishment can be fines, incarceration in jain for short term and in prison for longer term, probation, payment of restitution to crime victim, community service or drug and alcohol rehabilitation. Not only will the severity of the crime determine the punishment but the sentencing judge usually will consider the defendants criminal history or lack thereof; the nature of the crime, the manner in which it was committed and the impact on the victims. The judge will also take the defendants personal, economic, social circumstances and his/her regret or remorse expressed into consideration.…
As a judge, they play many roles; but the main purpose of their role is, “Sentencing.”…
Law enforcement teaches offenders that crime is punished. However, deterrence is the exclusion of commit a criminal act for factors as such as fear of sanctions or punishment. The history of deterrence begins by the end of the 1700s in the work of Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, but the interest in deterrence and rational choice theory developed by the mid-1960s. Specific deterrence view that if experienced punishment is severe enough, convicted offenders will be deterred from repeating their criminal activity. However, this theory states that people seek pleasure and avoid pain ( Weinrath and Gartrell, 2001). Both authors discuss that the length of punishment affects the offender to commit the crime again. In other words, specific deterrence…
Prison sentences are too soft in New Zealand to the criminals who commit serious crimes and need to be harsher.…
Sabrina Carlamere Deterrence Needs to be Deterred The one quote that stood out the most to me was the one given by the American Correctional Association. They stated, “The absence of a noticeable reduction in the adult crime rate as incarceration rates have climbed raises serious questions about the efficacy of America’s sentencing policies”. To me this is very relevant to society today. In American today the incarceration rates have climbed, but the adult crime rates have not reduced. Therefore, how effective is our sentencing policies in America. The American Correctional Association is hinting at the ideology of deterrence, and what deterrence should encompass. In goal of deterrence is highly theoretical (which is half the problem) in the fact that it is intended to prevent other potential offenders from committing crimes due to the potential for punishment. In other words, deterrence is supposed to make people not want to commit crimes if they see harsh punishment against crime. Therefore, the behavior of the offender should change, because they will not want to go through with the crime to resort with that harsh punishment. However, does this actually work? Do prisons deter people from crime? Behaviorally, I do not think deterrence works, because this might not faze them. Sometimes when people commit crimes, they do not care about the punishment, or feel any kind of remorse. Therefore, their behavior would not change so deterrence would be ineffective. Also, this also comes across the ideology of the death penalty, because that’s a major punishment. However, the death penalty doesn’t stop people from committing the crimes that person committed either. Therefore, deterrence simply does not work, because for an adult a slap on a wrist doesn’t cut it anymore. However, I believe incapacitation sentencing does work, and this should be used instead of deterrence. If you are imprisoned how are you supposed to commit crime? You simply can’t. Therefore, if an…