Senate Elections Essay

The names of the authors that wrote an article titled candidates and policy in the United States Senate elections are Gerald C. Wright and Michael B. Berkman. Although, previous literature on the subject suggests that policy is not a major factor in the decision making process, the article argued otherwise.
It is a known fact that a substantial policy differences between the candidates in a particular race exists. The outcome of the race determines policy. Positive correlation exists between a district or a state's position on the ideological spectrum and the position of the candidate on the ideological spectrum. Conservative states or districts have conservative candidates regardless of party affiliation. Meanwhile, liberal states or districts
For policy, a Senator's constituents are more likely to rely on policy issues to determine who to vote for than a constituency for a member of the House of Representatives. Although, this may be due to the office of Senator in relative to that of a Representatives. Senators are also more visible in the media as an example than members of the House of Representatives. Polling has helped in coming up with the new conclusion by the two authors in regards to the importance of policy on election in the United States Senate. Previously, the thought was, it is perhaps conceivable that a policy is a factor in determining who a voter will vote for, but the previous thinking believed that it is not a major factor. The authors have provided empirical evidence that suggests that policy does affect an outcome of an election and it is a major factor for voters in deciding who to vote for in a particular election for the United States Senate. Furthermore, although the study did not focus on the House of Representatives, the article's authors hypothesized that policy is a big factor in an election for the House of Representatives as