Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Selling Drugs for Fun and Profit

Good Essays
283 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Selling Drugs for Fun and Profit
10 April 2004
Selling Drugs for Fun and Profit The War on Drugs is an unmitigated waste of time money and manpower. While the United States has increased the mandatory minimums, it has done nothing to stem the need for a good buzz. The only thing better than a blunt is a nice piece of chunky monkey all lubed up and ready to go. You can say that drug dealers are evil people, but in reality they are no more than just businessmen. They see a need and they fill it. Prostitutes and drug dealers are no different than a retailer selling any other commodity; they just sell something that is illegal.

I have read "Drug traffickers share common traits along with the terrorists of the world. A drug trafficker does not have a general regard for human life. The only thing that matters to the trafficker is the money that is made from the illegal sale of the product. Whether the money comes from a twelve year old in anyone of the main cities in the United States" this is a blatant untruth. Why would you want to kill off your customer base? That is just not sound fiscal policy.

What could the United States do to reduce the illegal trafficking of drugs? Simple make marijuana, diazepam, and most of the schedule II narcotics legal for sale through government controlled or regulated distribution points. The last time I checked there was no drive by shootings in Amsterdam this week.

So be a good American, grow your own and light a blunt today!

WORKS CITED
Denny, David. TERRORISM, DRUG TRAFFICKING INEXTRICABLY LINKED. 5 December 2001 http://www.usembassy.it/file2001_12/alia/a112020508.htm

Cited: Denny, David. TERRORISM, DRUG TRAFFICKING INEXTRICABLY LINKED. 5 December 2001 http://www.usembassy.it/file2001_12/alia/a112020508.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drugking

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drug King has two financial assets, an investment in Series A and Series B preferred stock of TIp-Top that it will transfer to InsureAll. Series A stock is traded publically and has a call option written by InsureAll which allows the repurchase of the stock two years after the transfer date with a fixed exercise date. The Series B preferrd stock, which is not publically traded, will be transferred to InsureAll with a call option attached to the stock allowing DrugKing to repurchase the stock from whomever owns it as long as the purchase is completed within two years of the transfer date and like the Series A preferred stock it has a fixed exercise price. An outside source has also concluded that both "transfers isolate the transferred asset…beyond the reach of DrugKing and it creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership."…

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trade. If we (the U.S.) stop the drugs from entering our country, then I believe there will…

    • 499 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    El Chapo Thesis

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Various crime lords and syndicates prove to us that when someone is taken down in this business, someone else almost immediately will take their place and continue the trade as if nothing happened. The government itself is the main reason why this war continues; instead of simply regulating and taxing these drugs for recreational and medical advantages, our tax money is spent on something that will never have an end, throwing countless bodies and currencies into a bottomless pit. Is our drug fueled society itself fueled by the greed, corruption and violence started by the ones we chose to represent…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    English Comp Rough Draft

    • 1155 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Substance abuse and consumption have become an epidemic in America. The use of drugs results in countless drug-related deaths and causes states to spend billions of dollars to combat drug trafficking. Drugs are shipped in by sea, air, automobile, and even smuggled in by person. These drugs are supplied by drug cartels. These criminal organizations where formed to promote, control, produce, and distribute narcotic drugs. While these cartels operate from all parts of the world, some of the most infamous are the Mexican and Columbian Cartels. America has put policies into combating drug trafficking, however these policies are not effective as drug abuse is at a society crippling high.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalizing does not mean giving up on the problem; it rather means regulation and control over the situation. Contrasting the problem, criminalization means prohibition. The U.S cannot regulate what it prohibits, and drugs are too dangerous to remain unregulated. Prohibition will not help anyone, just like the U.S prohibited alcohol during the 20’s and 30’s, and it did not work. It is happening exactly like it with the drugs. U.S News & World Report writer Peter Moskos says, “ Illegal drug dealers sell to anyone. Legal Ones are licensed and help keep drugs such as beer, cigarettes, and pharmaceuticals away from minors. Illegal dealers settle disputes with guns, when on the other hand; legal ones solve theirs in court. Illegal dealers fear police, and legal ones fear IRS” (8). What Moskos is trying to explain is that by regulating the drugs things are kept under control. Usually people fall for drugs in a high percentage because it is “illegal”, and usually what we can have is what we want. By legalizing the U.S will be hitting hard the drug dealer’s economy and devastating their dirty, corrupt cartels. It is or choice to legalize drugs or pass through a second century of failed prohibition. Government regulation might not sound as powerful as “war on drugs” but it will do its job. (Moskos…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War On Drugs In The 1960s

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultimately the new “war on drugs” had a negative impact on American life during the mid 1980s-early 2000s due to the economic costs, the strain put on our justice system, and the civil liberty violations that occurred. As with any other war or bureaucratic endeavor, money must be heavily drawn upon and invested. When discussing the overall cost of this “war” through this time, congressman Lee Hamilton stated that, “Federal and local governments spend over $3 billion each year to fight drugs.” (cite) In his quote it becomes apparent that the United States had become highly invested and arguably obsessed in a seemingly impossible “war.”…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Exploratory Paper

    • 956 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In our world today you always hear about this so called ‘War on Drugs’. Living in Southern California, close to the Mexican Border I hear about this all the time. With always hearing about this so called war and seeing shows about cartels and drug smuggling, it began to spark my curiosity. What exactly is this so called ‘War on Drugs,’ are we winning, and what exactly is this all about?…

    • 956 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war on drugs has been going on for over thirty years. It does not appear that a lot of progress has been made. If the United States were fighting any other war, this long, with these results, they would change direction. The United States current drug policy has consumed tens of billions of dollars and ruined countless lives. According to Unitarian Universalists for Drug Policy Reform (2006), "The costs of this policy include the increasing breakdown of families, escalating rates of incarceration, political corruption, and the imposition of United States policy abroad. For United States taxpayers, the price tag on the drug offensive has soared from sixty six million in 1968 to…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "war on drugs" started over 100 years ago in San Francisco, California when the first law against drugs was enacted to stop the "smoking of opium." In all actuality, this law was against the Chinese people living in the U.S., because they were known for smoking of the opium as a custom. The government feared that opium induced Chinese men would try to lure white women to them. The next drug that was considered illegal was cocaine. The law enacted against cocaine was against Negroes. The government feared that Negroes would use the drug and become violent and go on rampages of raping white women. (Schaffer, n.d.)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet people in law enforcement and local communities are not convinced for good reasons. Although casual illegal drugs use appears to fluctuate and may have declined in recent years, the regular usage of these drugs has not. The government warning about how dangerous these are, such as; heroin, marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine only confuse matter further. Actually, such warning are an indication that these drugs are unwinnable. Production sources , smuggling techniques, purity price and use patterns have changed through the years in dynamic drugs markets as governments has made claims of progress, but the war on drugs that began in 1914 has no end in…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, prohibiting a commodity for which there is high demand inevitably creates profit opportunities for criminal entrepreneurs, pushing production, supply and consumption into an illicit parallel economy. Countries all around the world have been struggling with the war on drug trafficking which has led to illegal acts involving cartel organization, manufacturing, distribution, trafficking and the addiction to drugs.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Larry Elder, “The war on drugs is wrong, both tactically and morally. It assumes that people are too stupid, too reckless, and too irresponsible to decide whether and under what conditions to consume drugs. The war on drugs is morally bankrupt” ("war on drugs is wrong, both tactically and morally. It assumes that people are too stupid, too reckless, and too irresponsible to decide whether and under what conditions to consume drugs. The war on drugs is morally bankrupt.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The war on drugs in the United States is an expensive and deadly ongoing battle that has not yet been won. The term war on drugs provides drug distributors with more income due to the illegal nature of drugs. Americans do not have readily available easy access to many types of drugs that are illegal. Because narcotics are illegal that is enough for many people to want drugs. This is a major problem faced today in our prison systems throughout the United States. Especially in the state of California where many people find their way into our criminal justice system due to many factors…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the text, “The existing budget to fight the supply of drugs cannot compete with the limitless resources available to drug traffickers”. (R.Dowd, 1997). Even though the U.S. spends millions of dollars every year on the war against drugs, it’s not enough. Tax payers’ dollars are being used to fight drugs, while the drug traffickers have almost “limitless” resources due to the large amount of their gross income. Drugs that are being trafficked in the U.S. are also giving gangs the upper hand with a lot of different things. Drug cartels have so much money, power, and even respect from people and other gangs that it makes it even more difficult to stop them. As stated in the text: “ The U.S. has implemented many innovative ways to reduce drug trafficking over the last 20 years, but still has not been successful and bringing the number down to a tolerable level”. (D.Baum,…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Legalization

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One simple resolution of legalizing drugs would be eliminating drug cartels, which would cause crime rates to go down. Eduardo Porter from ‘’NY times’’ states “When policy makers in Washington worry about Mexico these days, they think in terms of a handful of numbers: Mexico’s 19,500 hectares devoted to poppy cultivation for heroin; its 17,500 hectares growing cannabis; the 95 percent of American cocaine imports brought by Mexican cartels through…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics