Preview

Self-Represented Litigants

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Self-Represented Litigants
SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS
NEW MEXICO STATEWIDE CONFERENCE PERSPECTIVES ON THE PRO SE PHENOMENON:
SCRIPT FOR A PANEL DISCUSSION Note: The above Script was prepared by John Greacen, Director of the New Mexico Administrative Office of the Courts, for the New Mexico Conference on Pro Se, presented in January 2001. The Script, while not necessarily reflecting the actual workshop, provides an excellent summary of, and introduction to this important issue.
Among the issues discussed below are:
From the judge’s and court staff perspective:
· lack of understanding of rules of procedure, rules of evidence, and courtroom protocol by self-represented litigants
· papers are not complete or correct causing delay in the courtroom
· litigants have difficulty presenting their position without getting emotionally involved
· difficulty in remaining fair and impartial when one party is represented by counsel and the other is not
· discomfort after ruling against a pro se litigant due to procedural non-compliance
· ex parte communications
· the use of court staff time
· difficulty in drawing the line between giving legal information and legal advice

From the lawyer’s perspective:
· waiting in court on a trailing docket while a pro se litigant in another case wastes everyone’s time and my client’s money
· difficulty in knowing how to conduct myself when the other party is unrepresented. If I raise all objections, the process goes nowhere, yet, I have a duty to represent my client.
· danger that the pro se litigant thinks I represent him or her too
· worry over future problems that might arise at a later date and be harder and more expensive to resolve if matters are not correctly resolved at the beginning
· concern that pro se assistance efforts will undermine the role of the bar and take away business

From the self-represented litigant’s perspective:
· lack of information and the inability to get the right forms or information for what I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the United States, a traditional litigation refers to the process of bringing, defending and maintaining a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Traditional litigation goes through a structured process of answer, discovery trial and jury. Whereas the nontraditional litigation process, alternative dispute resolution, known as ADR is a more flexible, less expensive, not as time consuming, and confidential process. There are several forms of alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and utilizing a judicial referee. Arbitration and mediation are similar to where it is a form of negotiation and a neutral party settles the dispute. Negotiation is where the two parties negotiate to settle the dispute. A mini-trial is a shortened version of a traditional litigation trial. Fact-finding situations call for the parties to employ a third party to investigate the facts to come to a resolution. Lastly, a judicial referee is much like a mini-trial but both parties reserve the right to appeal. Ninety percent of cases are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (Harms, 2011). The next several paragraphs will identify risks associated with traditional litigation and the advantages of the alternative dispute resolution in reducing those risks.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History of Regret

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Bibliography: Guttentag, Lucas. "Discrimination, Preemption, and Arizona’s Immigration Law - Stanford Law Review." Stanford Law Review. N.p., 18 June 2012. Web. 8 Dec. 2012. <http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/discrimination-preemption>.…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Issues

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the issues facing the court system today is judges are not able to see many cases because of their administrative role. Judges spend the majority of their time “papering budgets, scheduling cases, supervising employees, and maintaining court records” (Robinson, 2009, pg. 208, para 5). The courthouse employee’s work together getting cases dispensed as quickly as possible. Some of these cases are dismissed before even being seen because of how many cases there are. Many of the minor cases are plea bargained so that the…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify your case – an example of a case which reveals the many factors needed to be taken into account in balancing competing interests.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frivolous Lawsuits

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    As American citizens we do it everyday: we see something wrong and form ideas of suing. Whether our intentions are resolute or passive, the simple gesture itself poses a series of questions for why Americans find the courtrooms a haven to the solutions for their troubles. Although our forefathers didn't plan on suits like suing McDonalds for serving hot coffee or causing obesity in children in America, they did create a judicial system that was easily accessible and fair. If examining the root of the problem, we must look back over 200 years ago, when our forefathers envisioned a country with justice and equality, without the idea of abusing the legal system with the intention of financial betterment in mind. In fact, over the past 50 years, America has resorted to the legal system with that exact intention. A major gateway to this broad social change occurred when congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This era, known as the "due process revolution," was when lawyers won criminal defendants the right to a lawyer and a hearing (Jost). The aged and disabled began fighting for their rights, and eventually employees in the workplace caught on to the courtroom trend…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Use of Force

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Bruno, Lisa (2010) Justice 515 Class Syllabus pp 2. Retrieved from http://angel02.gcu.edu/AngelUploads/Content/JUS515 on 11-18-2010.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the name suggests, the adversary system in Australia refers to a method of trial, which involves contestants or adversaries, that is, it is an adversarial approach in attempting to resolve legal issues between two opposing sides. There are five features of the adversary system in Australia; contest; party control; strict rules of evidence and procedures; role of the judge or magistrate and single event trials. The strengths and weaknesses of the adversary system, which has evolved through out history are varied, and as a result the question of whether this system provides justice is often challenged.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    reduce tension and conflict from within the courtroom as she currently believes it presents itself as a…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, in certain dispute situations the balance between these two aims may get tipped more in favor of protecting and defending the professionals than in protecting the public. An example can be used to illustrate this. In a dispute between a lawyer and his/her client or between a patient and his/her doctor, the Law Society of England and Wales or the General Medical Council will inevitably find itself plunged into a conflict of interest in (a) its wish to defend the interests of the client, while also (b) wishing to defend the interests, status and privileges of the professional. It is clearly a tough call for it do both.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Small Claims Trial Essay

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is interesting as it came from the common law system where judges sat in a royal courts of justice that were established by English Kings in 1066CE. These principles have travelled through history and still applicable to this day. The judge came in well informed and prepared on the case before entering the trail. He was introduced to the plaintiff, Vino Petal, who was represented by a paralegal whereas the defendant, Waseem who was self-represented. The plaintiff was trying to prove breach of contract and fraud. After which the judge declared the case as “a commercial deal gone sour’’. The judge became furious when he had learned that Waseem showed a lack of due diligence as he did not have his small claims court rules. Due diligence is reasonable steps that must be taken in order to satisfy the law. Both parties showed a lack of due diligence that not only caused the judge to become impatient, but also went against the litigants favor. This highlights the significance of Due diligence in the court of law. Yet the absences of it show that you are not only wasting the time of the judge but also disrespecting the court. However the judge had a higher expectation from the paralegal compared to Waseem, who was self-represented. Then judge then said “ Mr. Waseem I am not your attorney but I will state the procedure for you”. As done in small claims…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Model

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As specialized courts continue to progress, Quinn (2009) stated that it is important that policymakers consider all voices, agnostics, and critics as they are all working to improve the courts (As cited in Cole and Getz, 2013). The material has clearly indicated that oftentimes policymakers have continued to overlook the issues mentioned above, which is quite problematic. It is crucial that individuals in such positions do not continue to poor economic resources into these courts without future experimentation, as the results have varied over the years. If one truly hopes to avoid repeating history and mistakes, our decisions must be fueled by more informed, balanced, and thoughtful discourse than what we are currently…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning of our journey through the Reptile we are constantly asking ourselves one question: “Why should Bubba Care about my Case?” The reason we ask that question stems from the “Why we Lose at Trial” stool. This stool tells us that reason we lose at trial is because of compassion fatigue, tort reform, and negative attribution. The jury comes to the courtroom tainted with these afflictions, without us making a single argument or admitting a single piece of evidence. These afflictions stem from their everyday experiences, expectations of society, and their hopes for the future.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Professional Jury System

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    be capable of sorting out the facts, they have a hard time understanding the judge’s instructions…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Observation

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case that I attended, both the plaintiff and defendant were represented by their respective lawyers. As I only had the opportunity to witness the defendant’s lawyer to prove his version of the case, as to call witness and asking questions. I felt that he wasn’t effective when presenting his case as he fumbled with his words a lot and was not questions most of time to the defendant. This shows that the counsel is unable to present himself well enough to communicate his facts to the witnesses. I also felt that counsel has…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    America Columbus School of Law, 2001–2003; Professor and Director of the Center on Law & Government at the University of Notre Dame, 1980–1999; Assistant Attorney General and Head of the Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice, 1985– 1989. 1. The use of the masculine in this…

    • 7781 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays