Preview

Selective Incorporation Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Selective Incorporation Case
The Bill of Rights was created to protect the basic rights of citizens living in the United States from the national government. However, there were many state and local government throughout this nation’s history that restricted the basic rights of their own citizens. Then came selective incorporation which is a process that saved many innocent people from prison for acting out their basic rights. Selective incorporation is not a law but it is a doctrine that makes sure the states’ lawmaker are not taking away American citizens constitutional right. This process opens a way to stop local and state government from taking away or creating laws which disobeys the constitution of the United States of America. We understand that even if these rights are never to be taken away, the government has ways to restrict someone from exercising their right. When the national government steps in to these situations it reminds us why we need the national government, to ensure that we are protected from those who want to take away our fundamental right. …show more content…
Minnesota case of 1931, is a landmark Supreme Court case which provides an insight on how selective incorporation works. It begins when a man named Near, published an article which people claimed to be hateful and racist. The state police of Minnesota arrested Near because this was released to the public which was a violation of the Minnesota Gag Law of 1925. This was implemented because they wanted to prevent hate speech in the media which they were afraid would cause a riot. Near stated that this was a violation to his 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech, he wanted to express how he felt not start a riot. This case went to the Supreme Court which turned to be an important case for everyone in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thus, the court ruled that the Minnesota law was unconstitutional as it violated the right of freedom of the press. Dissent/Concurrences: None Doctrine: Prior censorship of the press violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press. Exceptions exist in limited and extreme circumstances. Case: New York Times vs. United States 1971 U.S. Supreme…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Bethel School District v. Fraser a lot happened. In my understanding there was a school event in which students gave speeches. The one student gave a speech with language unaccepted in the school, and got suspended, and was not allowed to be voted in for the election. The Father got angry and believed that his sons amendment rights were being violated. He felt like his sons first amendment right of freedom of speech was being withheld from him, along with his fourteenth amendment right. The case first went to a general court and it could not be agreed upon, so in tern it went to the Supreme Court because it could not be agreed upon in the lower court system and was to controversial. The court case was taken extremely seriously because it could change school rights, as they were known.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plessy v. Ferguson. This case upheld the rights of states to pass laws allowing or even…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution’s Structural Limits on Power Should Be the Focus of the Bill of Rights” contains many valuable insights. In particular, it re-affirms the proposition – lost for many years but perhaps gaining some new currency – that the so-called “structural” provisions of the Constitution are, and were intended to be, not merely matters of mundane and perhaps outdated institutional design but core protections of individual liberty. Further, it rightly emphasizes that the antifederalist-inspired Bill of Rights amendments work together with the Constitution’s structural provisions to limit government and promote individual liberty by reducing the federal government’s power even in areas in which it is granted authority.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Selective incorporation is the gradual or piecemeal process by which the Supreme Court makes provisions of the bill of rights apply to the states. Explain how this process works. Give one example. what this looks like is first a state law is challenged in a federal court (that is, someone claims the law…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas E. Patterson explains the concept of selective incorporation as the process by which certain of the rights contained in the Bill of Rights become applicable through the Fourteen Amendment to actions by the state governments. Before the doctrine of selective doctrine, the Bill of Rights only applied to action by the federal government and not against action by the states. Until in 1925, the Court invoked the Fourteen Amendment in a case involving the state government, which marked a fundamental shift in constitutional doctrine. Which concluded that a right protected by the Bill of Rights from action by the federal government was now also protected from action by individual states, leading to a more national understanding of civil liberties.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAW 421 week 2 reflection

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution applies the Bill of Rights to the states. The Due Process clause outlines procedural laws when the government affects an individual’s life, liberty, or property rights. If the government has to interfere with an individual’s or business’s rights for instance, procedures are that they must give proper notice first. The states’ substantive power to control an individual’s rights is limited by the Due Process Clause. For example, laws passed by the state must be published and written specifically so that anyone may understand them (Melvin, 2011).…

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation Of Powers Dbq

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At first, some of the first people in America didn’t want to have a federal government that had too much power. The Founding Fathers created the Constitution of the United States of America after the Articles of Confederation failed. There are numerous documents in the Constitution that limit the federal government in many ways. For example there is a system called Checks and Balances that gives certain powers to each branch. In the United States, there is something called the Separation of Powers which also limits the federal government. It keeps one branch of government from becoming too powerful against the other branches. Furthermore, the Bill of Rights also limits the federal government. Also known as the first ten additions or amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights protect individual liberties. As you can…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many principles from the U.S constitution. One of them is federalism, federalism in the U.S constitution was divided power between the central governments and states. Federalism is a system based on democratic rules and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and state governments, creating a federation. The constitution came up with amendments and the Tenth Amendment specifically is made for those powers not to be delegated to the United States by the Constitution. The national and state government has different powers. Some of the examples that the national government does is they have provide an army and navy also make treaties and conduct foreign policies, they make laws that are needed to start these powers and etc. The state government is different, they conduct elections, establish local governments, use powers the constitution doesn’t pass on to the national government or that the state doesn’t use. They also did share powers like collecting taxes, built roads, established courts, and many more. Both governments didn’t allow discrimination and provided equal protection for everyone. The Bill of Rights controlled only the federal government. The states, because of this could offer or choose not to offer the protections by the first ten amendments. After the Civil War the federal government fixed that the southern states shouldn’t be allowed without guarantees. The states that had succeeded had to guarantee black suffrage and the running of the Fourteenth Amendment which was equal protection in their new state constitutions before they…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights and the fourteenth amendment are the most important constitutional provisions affecting civil liberties policy making. Bills of Rights which are the 1st 10th amendment of the constitution. Fourteenth amendment granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States. I really appreciate what government have done for people’s right because according to my experience I have never seen in any country such as Europe, Asia or Middle East where people have such freedom like those. Bill of rights such as freedom of expression or religion was not guaranteed to be absolute, government could resist one’s right unless they cross the limit. The condition was to keep balance between the Church and State. I agree…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The incorporation of the Bill of Rights is the procedure by which the United States courts have implemented pieces of the United States Bill of Rights to the states, by the due process clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. During the case of Barron v. Baltimore, the U.S. Supreme Court expressed that the Bill of Rights implemented to the government, but not to the states. Some claimed that the creator of the 14th Amendment intention had been to reverse this particular precedent. This Amendment is one of the reconstruction Amendment, and was adopted in 1868. The fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause forbids local and state governments from denying persons of liberty, life, or property without particular steps that guaranteed fairness.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When James Madison put in the Bill of Rights he had explained that it was suppose to limit the power of government. It would provide a second limitation on the power of government. The Bill of Rights is more than just a way to generally limit the power of the federal government; the rights protected by the Bill of Rights were those that were most effective in empowering people to control and limit their government. Not only did the Bill of Rights create limitations on government, but it specifically identified areas of freedom which, when exercised, could further help to limit…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American people have been known from the start for a strong Constitution created to protect the rights of their citizens. As culture evolved, our interpretation of the document has shifted with it, but the document itself and its fundamental concepts have not. The Constitution has protected the basic rights of all citizens, and has granted us certain privileges that allow us to uphold the democracy and the government that serves the people. Some of these include the right to vote and the ability of citizens to maintain their status.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas Constitution Essay

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of a state constitution is to “indicate the process by which problems will be solved, both in the present and in the future, and should not attempt to solve specific problems, presumably, if this principle is followed, later generations will not need to adopt numerous amendments” (Biles, 2015, p.53). Daily, the Texas Constitution impacts the lives of Texans such as a legislative session being held Austin this past week stating that “under the [Texas] Constitution, we cannot hear bills on the floor of the House during the first 60 days of a legislative session unless they are declared to be an emergency item by the governor” (Metcalf, 2017, p.1).Evidently, we see that the Texas Constitution plays a huge role in every decision such as in Austin with the Texas Legislature. A state constitution differs from the U.S. Constitution that “within the federal system, state constitutions are subject to the U.S. Constitution” (Biles, 2015, p.42).…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conceptualization that individuals have guaranteed rights bestowed upon them is absolutely fascinating. Unlike any other country, America is a completely free country. To know that the government will never infringe upon citizens’ rights is amazing. Civil liberties are gifts from God. They are liberties that are granted to each citizen of the United States of America that cannot be taken away from anyone or by anyone. The Bill of Rights was establish to list these specific guarantees of civil liberties that individuals of America are entitled to have, such as the second amendment. Only individual’s natural rights are listed in the bill of rights so that a person is aware of the rights that are inheritably theirs. By civil liberties,…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays