Preview

Selection of the Jury - Oj Simpson Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
637 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Selection of the Jury - Oj Simpson Case
Selection of the Jury - OJ Simpson Case

The jury selection of OJ Simpson trial started on September 24, 1994 in the judge's courtroom. Present that day were: 250 potential members of the jury, the judge, Simpson, and lawyers for both sides. The Judge explained procedures to the potential jury members and warned them that the trial might last several months. The judge told the potential jurors they must complete a 79-page, 294-question questionnaire, including questions proposed by both the prosecution and defense. In addition, they were to complete a one-page "hardship" questionnaire designed to determine jurors who could be initially excluded from the selection process. Potential jurors complained about the lengthy questionnaire, which took about four hours for many people to complete. They also were overheard muttering complaints about the personal nature of many of the questions.

The Jury selection continued for two months. The Judge excluded from consideration potential jurors who violated his strict rules relating to exposure to the media. One juror was excluded for watching cartoons with her children, another for waking up to a clock radio. On October 18, a book about the couple’s relationship hit the bookstores, causing the judge to order a temporary halt to jury selection and to tell potential jurors "to stay out of bookstores." A week later there was another controversy, the prosecutor had publicly complained that potential jurors were "lying" to get on the Simpson jury and that they all ought to be given lie-detector tests. It was refused by the judge. During the VOIR DIRE process, each potential juror took a seat at a conference table. Also seated at the table, were lawyers for both sides and Simpson. Jurors who give answers that indicate that they have prejudged the case can be challenged for cause, others can be excluded using a limited number of peremptory challenges. Attorneys can exercise their peremptory challenges for almost any reason -

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecutors are not supposed to select certain gender, race or age for the jury selection. The important for the plaintiff and the defendant is to have jurors who are not in favor of any involved parties. In cases were a lawsuit involves significant amount of money, the voir dire has become extra complicated over time, so now attorneys use skilled jury selection services to help them pick analytical data to select the perfect jurors. Attorneys think with the option of selecting professional jurors can help their clients win cases. Critics complain, this special jury selection services provide an unfair help to the other party, who cannot afford the cost of the…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    O. J. Simpson Case Summary

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Colley Jr. was an ordinary man with little money and no fame. He shot and killed his wife, Amanda Cloaninger-Colley and her close friend, Lindy Dobbins on August 27, 2015. He fled from the police but was later arrested and found guilty of both murders. On June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ronald Goldman, were found murdered outside of Simpson’s condo. Her husband, at the time, was the very famous and very wealthy professional football player Orenthal James Simpson, also known as O.J. Simpson. He fled from the police and was arrested. Simpson was the key suspect in both murders, but after a lengthy trial, he was later exonerated on all charges. How could this wealthy man not get charged with murder, when he was clearly the perpetrator?…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1985, Orenthal James Simpson married Nicole Brown Simpson. Several years later, the couple had filed for divorce. Throughout their marriage Orenthal was allegedly abusing Nicole. On June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found dead outside of her Los Angeles home. Both victims had multiple lacerations across their faces and necks. Also, the wounds in their necks were very severe and exposed their larynxes. The police believed the crime was committed between 10:15 and 10:40 p.m. Soon enough, Orenthal was arrested because the LAPD believed he was the main suspect in the double homicide case. When he was arraigned, OJ pleaded not guilty to the charges of first degree murder.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Oj Simpson Case

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    O.J simpson was acquitted of all charges of killing his ex-wife and her friend. On June 12, 1994 the bodies of Nicole brown ex wife of former football player and her friend Ronald Goldman were found outside Browns house. The crime scene was covered in blood, and there was also a black glove which had DNA evidence of Oj Simpson. O.J simpson at the time was out of town and was called by a detective to inform him of the death of his former wife. Later, when he arrived detectives noticed a cut on his finger due to a glass breaking.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Trial Analysis

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This was a rather catchy song. While I’m not typically a country music fan, this song got stuck in my hard for far longer than I care to admit. The chorus of the song sees Chris Knight repeating that he was framed for the murder of his wife’s presumed lover. I might even have believed that he was framed, except for the section where he states that the “man took his wife, he was hell bound. Even if he did shoot him down, I was framed.” He attempted to justify his actions by blaming the shooting victim and saying that he wasn’t the only one to blame for the situation that occurred. This song is a rough parallel to the OJ Simpson trial. OJ Simpson was accused of killing his wife, Nicole and her friend Ron Goldman. Prosecutors unsuccessfully…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the event that the O.J. Simpson case characterized the most recent century's fixation on American wrongdoing and its arrangement of equity, "Innocent Killer" puts forth the defense for owning that refinement in this one. Armies of watchers, changed into online sleuths, keep on analyzing through the subtle elements of the mind-twisting instance of Steven Avery, the Manitowoc District man who was wrongly sentenced in 1985, just to be captured two years after his discharge from jail for the awful murder of Teresa Halbach.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This stage is an examination of potential jurors to ensure a fair trial for the defendant. Ideally, voir dire will result in an impartial jury for the trial of the accused. On March 4, 2004 jury selection began for the trial of Scott Peterson. Nearly 100 potential jurors began answering questionnaires about their views on the death penalty and their opinions on extramarital affairs. The nearly 30-page questionnaire given to prospective jurors also included questions as whether they read Field and Stream, what stickers grace their car bumpers and whether they have lost a child. On April 14, 2004 Judge Alfred A. Delucchi dismissed an unidentified Redwood City woman after a brief meeting in his chambers. Defense attorney Mark Geragos two weeks early had accused the retired secretary of bragging to her friends on a bus trip to Reno, Nevada, that she has "passed the test" to get on Peterson's jury and that Peterson was "guilty as hell" and would "get what's due him." May 28, 2004 six men and six women were selected for Scott Peterson's murder trial all said they would be willing to sentence him to death if they convict him of killing his wife and the couple's fetus.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the stage of jury selection, attorneys have the opportunity to remove specific jurors that they believe may possess prejudicial attitudes that may negatively effect their goal regarding the outcome of the case. There are specific subjects that attorneys can touch upon when asking their potential jurors questions that may or may not reflect their attitudes of topics similar to their case. Examples of topics addressed include: media contact, knowledge of the defendants and their case, trust in the government, spare time activities, organizational memberships, opinion on war/conflicts, and other issues that are potentially related to the trial.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This week’s group presentation was about the jury selection. In many states they add the list of driver’s license and telephone directories to the juror pool which is how jurors get summons with a specific date and time. Other states add government list such as tax rolls and people who receive unemployment or food stamps however it is all random selection. Everyone has the right to trial and jurors are essential to this process. In order for a juror to get selected they must be citizens that are register to vote, are over the age of 18, they have to be mentally competent, speak English, and never convicted of any crimes. When selecting a jury this process is very long due to no-shows or people who responded they couldn’t make it. “Unfortunately,…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moreover, jury selection takes longer in capital punishment cases and a defendant is held on death row which typically takes years before being executed while the defense make extensive investigation of the defendant’s case because people cannot limit reviewing a defendant’s claim on innocence, especially if it is life they are fighting for. Additionally, more judges, juries, and all court personnel have to get paid for putting more time in the…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nine Ten

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the play unfolds, we are presented with some of the characters and their situation at the jury grand hall. People are seated at different benches in the room. "Lyris: Why do they call us at eight-thirty? It's like, nine already, and they haven't said anything." (Line 7), the opening consist of complaints on why they're up so early if nothing is happening. Jury duty is a slow process for everyone and not just the jurors. Picking out the names of people who are going to serve takes a hefty amount of time as people come in at different times in the morning. One individual, Nick, thinks about a way of getting out of jury duty. He tries to do so by making them think he's a criminal and not some ordinary person. "Nick: I'm going to tell the judge that I'm a felon. He won't even…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An examination process called voir dire is performed on each potential juror, to ensure any unbiased or preconceived notions of guilt or innocence doesn’t exist. Any person desiring or summoned by a judge to sit on the panel must meet certain qualifications. An individual must be 18 years of age, be a citizen, live in the judicial area for one year, and speak English, no mental or physical conditions or any felony charges. Certain people are excused from juror duty; armed forces, professional fire, police and public officers. The Jury Act will excuse a person from jury duty on the grounds of undue hardship or an extreme inconvenience.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision Making of Juries

    • 4552 Words
    • 19 Pages

    In an ideal world, a jury would be made up of unbiased and unprejudiced people, intelligent enough to comprehend the evidence and with the necessary verbal and social skills to contribute to discussion. In the real world however, research has shown that jury verdicts are influenced by irrelevant aspects of the defendant such as their physical attractiveness, gender, race and even their accent.…

    • 4552 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the voir dire, when selecting the jury, attorneys are biased in that they will do what they can to win the case. Therefore, both attorneys select jurors that they believe will decide the verdict in favor of their side. Prosecutors are more likely to excuse those they feel will decide in favor of the defendant, and defense attorneys are more likely to excuse those they think will decide against their clients. Since each side is allowed their certain amount of peremptory challenges that they do not need to provide a reason for, they are able to choose jurors they believe will decide in their favor (Politan,…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I liked you clarification of closing statement particularly when you expressed that the end contention is the event when a prosecutor convinces the jury. However is right, the jury ought to be given a decent closing statement which will permit them to come up with a guilty or not guilty verdict. Juries in criminal cases are by and large, generally speaking, required to achieve a consistent decision, and when jury turn into a hung jury or halted jury normally imply that the end proclamation wasn't sufficiently clear for jury to settle on a consistent choice. The closing statement is very important to the…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics