Selection and Recruitment

Topics: Validity, Psychometrics, Cognitive Abilities Test Pages: 18 (5949 words) Published: June 21, 2009
EMPLOYMENT RECRUITMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW

CRITICALLY EVALUATE VARIOUS SCREENING AND SELECTION METHODS AND RECOMMEND A SCREENING AND SELECTION PROGRAMME FOR YOUR DEPARTMENT

This paper will critically evaluate and explore the key tools and techniques that are used in selection and recruitment process by the organizations. Organizations have infact, a vast range of tools to consider in screening and selecting a workforce. This paper will analyze the theoretical principles behind the relevant screening and selection method and then apply the theories to the Jandal Air Call Centre. The first section of this paper defines and describes the key concepts of validity, predictive validity, utility and reliability and then investigating the nature of call centre work and identifying the key competencies required in the Jandal Air Call Centre. The second section will critically evaluates the selection methods such as application blanks, biographical data, resumes and cover letters, reference checks and initial interviews. The third section will analyze and evaluate the selection methods of personality tests including service orientation inventories, cognitive testing, work samples, integrity tests, structure interviews and assessment centre's. This paper concludes with a final screening and selection plan for the Jandal Air Call Centre and considers its implementation. Organization's major challenge in the rapidly changing work environment is designing and managing successful staffing processes. (Heneman & Judge, 2006). Organizations use external or internal recruitment methods to get the best possible candidate in order to achieve their goals and objectives. Legge (1995), argues that the integration and internal consistency of human resource systems is very important for organizational success. Thus he says that the selection and recruitment processes are the foremost part of finding and identifying potential candidates. Success in securing appropriate and skilled employees sets upper limits on potential organizational performance, however good the management and development of that workforce be (Wolf & Jenkins, 2006). Heneman and Judge (2006), suggest that although costs need to be considered in evaluating assessment methods, more consideration should be given to the fact that valid selection measures pay off and will return many times their cost. Firms that are less selective or hire lower-skilled employees are likely to experience significant effects on productivity, while hiring a mismatched employee can result in poor performance and higher turnover rates (Batt, 2002). The importance of careful selection is punctuated in the case of front-line service roles, as these employees are situated at the organizational-customer interface, representing the organization to customers (Ashforth & Humphery, 1993). However, according to Hays Recruitment (2009), due to the current economic climate, pressure to maximize sales and revenue has created demand for experienced telesales consultants, while the need to maintain customer bases has created demand for capable customer service representatives. Selectors need to be aware of how well particular methods predict future performance which is the validity and of the different methods cost, relative to the increased accuracy they bring which the utility (Wolf & Jenkins, 2006). In staffing, there is a concern with the validity of predictors both in terms of accuracy of measurement and accuracy of prediction (Heneman and Judge, 2006). It is important to use predictors that are an accurate representation of the knowledge, skills and other abilities (KSAOs) to be measured. In order to assess the various screening and selection methods we must first understand the key concepts of validity, reliability and utility. According to Heneman and Judge (2006), validity refers to the accuracy of measurement and accuracy of prediction, as reflected by the...


References: Ashforth, B., & Humphery, R. (1993). Emotional Labour in Service Roles: The Influence of Identity. Academy of Management Review, 18 (1), 88-115.
Barrick, M., Mount, M., & Judge, T. (2001). Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? Personality and Performance, 9 (1), 9-29.
Batt, R. (2002). Managing Customer Services: Human Resources Practices, Quit Rates, and Sales Growth. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (3), 587-597.
Bartram, D. (2004). Assessment in Organizations. Applied Psychology, 53 (2), 237-259.
Bright, J., & Hutton, S. (2000). The Impact of Competences Statements on Resumes for Short-listing Decisions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 79 (1), 897-908.
Brown, S. H., (1981). Validity Generalization and Situational Moderation in the Life Insurance Industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66 (6), 664-670.
Callaghan, G., and Thompson, P. (2002). We Recruit Attitude: the Selection and Shaping of Routine Call Centre Labour. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (2), 223-255.
Deery, S., Iverson, R.,. & Walsh, J. (2002). Work Relationships in Telephone Call Centres: Understanding Emotional Exhaustion and Employee Withdrawal. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (4), 471-496.
Dewberry, C. (2001). Performance Disparities between White and Ethnic Minorities: Real Differences or Assessment Bias. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74 (5), 659-674.
Elkins, T., and Philips, J. (2000). Job Context, Selection Decision Outcome and Perceived Fairness of Selection Tests: Biodata as an illustrative case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 479-484.
Frei, R., & McDaniel, M. (1998). Validity of Customer-Service Measures in Personnel Selection: a Review of Criterion and Construct Evidence. Human Performance, 11 (1), 1-27.
Frenkel, S., Korczynski, M., Shire, K., & Tam, M. (1998). Beyond Bureaucracy: Work Organization in Call Centres. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9 (6), 957-979.
Gaines, J., & Jermier, J. (1983). Emotional Exhaustion in a High-Stress Organization. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 567-586.
Hays Recruitment. (2009). Hays Contact Centres - April 2009. Retrieved May 5 2009, from http://hays-hps.co.nz/forecast/contactcentres.aspx.
Heneman, H., & Judge, T. (2006). Staffing Organization. Middleton, WI: McGraw Hill.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The Managed Heart: The Commercialization of Human Feeling, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hunt, E. (1999). Intelligence and Human Resources: Past Present and Future in Ackerman. American Psychological Association, 3-31
Kleinmann, M
Lawler, E. (1994). From Job-Based to Competency-Based Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15 (1), 3-15.
Legge, K. (1995). Human Resource Management; Rhetoric 's and Realities. London, Macmillan Business Press.
Markus, Cooper-Thomas & Allpress (2005). Confounded by Competencies: An Evaluation of the Evolution and use of Jobs Involving Interpersonal Interactions. NZ Journal of Psychology, 34 (2), 117-126.
Murphy, C. (2000). Impact of Assessments of Validity Generalization and Situational Specifically on the Science and Practice of Personnel Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 194-215.
Ones, D., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Integrity Tests and other Criterion: Focused Occupational Personality Scales (COPS) used in Personnel Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9 (1), 31-39.
Parry, E., & Tyson, S. (2008). An Analysis of the use and success of online Recruitment Methods in the UK. Human Resource Management Journal, 18 (4), 257-274.
Redman, T., & Matthews, B. (1998). Service Quality and Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda. Personnel Review, 27 (1), 57-77.
Robertson, T., & Smith, M. (2001). Personnel Selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74 (4), 441-472.
Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Research: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (2), 262-274.
Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1980). The Future of Criterion-Related Validity. Personal Psychology, 33, 168-180.
Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (2004). General Mental Ability in the World of Work: Occupational Attainment and Job Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (1), 162-173.
Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. (1992). The Service Organization: Human Resources Management is Crucial. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 39-52.
Searle, R. (2003). Selection and Recruitment, Open University, London.
Taylor, P., & Bain, P. (1999). An assembly line in the head: the Call Centre Labour Process.
Wolf, A., & Jenkins, A. (2006). Explaining greater test use for Selection: the role of HR Professional in a World of Expanding Regulation. Human Resource Management, 16 (2), 193-213.
+
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Recruitment and selection Essay
  • Selection and Recruitment Essay
  • Recruitment and Selection Essay
  • Recruitment & Selection Essay
  • Recruitment and selection Essay
  • Recruitment and Selection Essay
  • Recruitment and Selection paper 1
  • Recruitment and selection process Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free