Preview

Sega Enterprises, Ltd. V. Accolade, Inc.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
913 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sega Enterprises, Ltd. V. Accolade, Inc.
In this recent Ninth Circuit case the issues centered on compatibility between video games. Accolade copied a Sega video game to obtain compatibility with the Sega Genesis game system.
Accolade decompiled the machine readable object code from a Sega game in order to achieve compatibility with the Sega system for games that it wished to independently create and market. Accolade then created a manual containing only the functional specifications of this decompiled code and not any of Sega's actual code. Accolade next created its own games for the Sega Genesis system using only the functional specifications. The first issue in the case was whether or not this intermediate copying by Accolade constituted copyright infringement or was it a fair use of the code.
Another issue the court decided was whether a screen display of Sega's trademark by the Accolade games was a Lanham Trademark Act violation. Sega included a trademark security system which was required on the game cartridge in order for the system to recognize the particular game." Accolade found this code during its reverse engineering of the Sega game and added it to their manual as a standard header to be included in all games. Thus, when Accolade games are inserted into the Sega Genesis system, the console reads this trademark security system initialization and the Sega trademark is flashed up on the screen. The district court ruled that this trademark security system code was not functional and Accolade could not use such a defense to the trademark infringement claim. The district court also ruled in favor of Sega on the copyright claim and issued an injunction against Accolade, also requiring the recall of all of Accolade's infringing games.' The Ninth Circuit then stayed the injunction and recall order, and decided to hear the case.
As to the trademark issue, the appeals court ruled in Accolade's favor stating that "when there is no other method of access to the computer that is known or readily

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Siegel v. New England Merchants National Bank, 386 Mass. 672, 437 N.E.2d 218, Web 1982…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people argued that it should be abandoned because it is outdated (Tavella, 2012). But New York, Florida and Pennsylvania still outlined the Ultramares rule while some states have adopted different approaches even today. The case of Credit Alliance Corp. v. Arthur Anderson & Co. was among of the cases that reaffirmed the Ultramares rule in the recent…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Comedy III Productions was the registered owner of all rights of former celebrities known as…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mantor v Circuit city inc

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mantor was able to avoid either signing up or openly refusing to participate in the AIRP for three years.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Swoboda Case Study

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ron Swoboda, a former member of the New York Mets baseball team, filed a lawsuit in the State of Louisiana over an internet merchandiser named Parody Productions, LLC selling novelty cards featuring famous baseball players including the plaintiff. This lawsuit is followed initial request of Swoboda to cease the sales which the merchandiser rejected. The trial court made a verdict in favor of the defendant, stating that the court does not have the personal jurisdiction over the defendant to sustain the case itself for trial, which resulted in this appeal in question.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bell was seeking a declaratory judgement that the use of the “Star Bock Beer” logo and name, in connection with alcoholic beverages, was not in violation of the Defendant’s rights under the “Federal Law of Trademark Infringement”, the “Federal Law of Unfair Competition”, the “Common Law of Unfair Competition”, the “Federal Trademark Dilution Act” or the “Texas Anti-Dilution Statute”. Defendants contested and filed counterclaims alleging violations of the aforementioned laws.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    v. Alza Corp., the court found independent standing as the licensee had completely unrestricted rights to sue for infringement. The licensor, University of California, gave an exclusive license to Ciba-Geigy. Alza claimed that Ciba-Geigy lacked standing, but this was rejected by the court because not only did the licensor give the licensee the right to sue infringers, they also agreed to not file any infringement suits of its own. The licensee was allowed to pursue the litigation without absolutely any participation whatsoever from the licensor, and thus had all substantial rights required to independently stand in…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1991 about 10,000 Exxon dealers sued Exxon Corporation in federal court, alleging that the corporation had engaged in an extensive scheme to overcharge them for fuel. A jury found in favor of the plaintiffs, but the District Court judge certified the case for review on the question of supplemental jurisdiction. Some of the multiple plaintiffs in the case had claims that did not meet the minimum amount necessary to qualify for federal diversity jurisdiction (currently $75,000). In 1990 Congress had enacted 28 U.S.C. Section 1367, overturning Finley v. United States, which had narrowly interpreted federal courts' power to confer supplementary jurisdiction on related claims. The question for the District Court was whether Section 1367 also overturned Zahn v. International Paper Co., which ruled that each plaintiff had to separately meet the minimum amount-in-controversy requirement. The District Court accepted the plaintiffs' argument that Section 1367 gave federal courts power to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs with related claims, even if some plaintiffs' claims did not meet the required amount. On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court's ruling on supplemental jurisdiction. However, this ruling conflicted with the ruling of another Circuit, which had taken the opposite view of Section 1367's scope (see Ortega v. Star-Kist Foods, No. 04-79). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and consolidated the cases for argument.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In assessing the author’s reflection on the case study, it can be realized that he has failed to cite specific examples from the case to support his arguments. He mostly uses some generalized circumstances, which may also be acceptable due to the limited word count requirements of the response. Overall, the author has justified the perspectives of Disney’s vulnerability from the communications standpoint. The biblical integration is also relevantly compared with the case, as the author uses the story of Jesus and his struggles against the oppositions.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    legal summary

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page

    Facts: the case between the two cases were intense, Lionel was trading Mikes Trains House Secrets, Once Mikes Train House Inc. found out in they began arguing in court on June, 7th 2006. The court took almost 6 months to come to the ruling. Defendant Lionel, L.L.C., is found guilty and liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and the use of blueprints, awarding the Plaintiff, Mike's Train House Inc., over $40 million in damages and $11 million in lost profit. MTH identified its "trade secrets" the joint and liability of the amount of the damage awarded. Lionel also appeals the court, granting MTH's request for order, Because Lionel argues that the court admitted expert testimony.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M International (“M”) and W Inc. (“W,” a competitor of M) have been engaged in long- standing litigation over a specific patent infringement matter. Below is a summary timeline of specific events that have taken place related to this matter:…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buffets v. Klinke

    • 3142 Words
    • 10 Pages

    PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff appealed a judgment from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington in favor of defendants on claims for misappropriation of trade secrets under Wash. Rev. Code § 19.108.010(4), and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, Wash. Rev. Code § 19.86.020.…

    • 3142 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traco vs Arrow

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The court affirmed the judgment of the lower court in favor of appellee subcontractor, finding that promissory estoppel was a viable cause of action in a bid construction case. The court found that the award of damages based on this theory was factually supported by the evidence, and that there was statutory authority for the award of attorneys' fees. The determination of the rate of prejudgment interest also was proper.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various plaintiffs sued Mitsubishi Motors Corporation after a sport utility vehicle rolled over while driven on a freeway. The trial court entered an order granting the defense a motion to disqualify plaintiff’s legal team and experts. The California Court of Appeal affirmed its decision and plaintiffs sought review.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays