Preview

"Seeing Conditions What We Believe

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1124 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
"Seeing Conditions What We Believe
When a closer look is taken at the working of human nature, we begin to notice a reoccurring pattern. Whereas faith is often constructed based on a person's initial perception of a situation, it is this faith that, once finalized, goes on to limit perception of new situations, therefore resulting in a downward spiral of limited understanding. Many prominent examples of this gradual digression have presented themselves throughout history providing as support to the general statement ‘seeing conditions what we believe: believing conditions what we see' which I will discuss.

The majority of human opinion of ‘belief' is formulated based on personal experience to which we apply our own understanding. Generally, human creativity appears to be limited to facts that relate to information we have been told. For instance, when trying to create and image of an extra terrestrial life form, though we know that it is quite possible that it would not resemble a human in any way, our imagination of such a creature is still limited so as to include humanistic attributes. Therefore, based on this example and the idea it portrays, we can validly state that we base our ideas, or beliefs, on things we experience; or rather, see. With this idea stated, we can now examine some supporting examples where something we see affects our belief, a practice that is often referred to as generalization. The devastation that occurred on September 11th, 2001 in New York City is a widely known incident. Many people stood by and watched as the two planes crashed into the world trade center in riveting seriatim and countless more stood by their televisions to witness this atrocity. It was not long before the message was out: the people responsible for this atrocity were suicide bombers from an afghani terrorist group. How has this affected our perception of people from Afghanistan? Racial profiling directed to people of the Muslim race, even people of darker skin, are stopped and more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Freud and Tillich

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay Draft

    • 2480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    and belief are occurring quite frequently. In a day and age where “rational thought” is prioritized…

    • 2480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will be examining Kierkegaard’s ‘Fear and Trembling’. I will aim to show why, according to Kierkegaard, the book of Genesis story of Abraham and Isaac illustrates the paradoxical nature of faith. I will define particular terms, which are key to my understanding of the text. ‘Faith’ for Kierkegaard is a personal and subjective obligation to follow God’s words above all else. This involves making a leap from complying with what would be deemed as ‘rational’ or ‘ethical’ and accepting the ‘absurd’. By ‘paradox’, Kierkegaard is referring to tension, which exists between two points.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanley Fish discusses how we in society base our lives off of assumptions. Using the example of Dorothy and the tree, Fish is able to show how with our assumptions, we as people categorize others and things into what we believe to be correct. Whether or not we have actually taken the time to figure out if we are right is irrelevant. He notes that we should just “keep trying to expand our sense of ‘us’ as far as we can”, so we can avoid judgments and isolating ourselves from the rest of society. Even though Dorothy realizes her mistake, she doesn’t realize that it is not a failure, but her consciousness assuming the classification of things in the world. Fish later on defines thought as the “structure that at once enables perception”, meaning that within categories things emerge, limiting perception and nothing can allow one to see everything because that is God’s job. Fish uses many Bible allusions to create justification for his assertions. He uses Genesis 1:26, and Paul’s road to Damascus to show that people can be persuaded to change their placement of things in society. Despite all of his valid points, Fish states that it is nearly impossible for one to change just on realizations. He believes it takes practice to accept the fact that there are things that we cannot comprehend because there is no limit on the conceptual trappings of…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bias among many Americans since the September 11 attacks leads to many treating those of the Islamic faith as sub-humans; therefore, prejudice against them are justified by civilians. Decka infers that the racialization is unethical because it places people with different values against each other. In this case, it is Muslims who are often discriminated because they are seen as less civil than others. The inhumane treatment of those detained are justified because their cultural differences make them the enemy. However, Decka believes that even though they may be a potential threat, there should be alternatives and do the ethical thing and treat those detained as humans instead of…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book Future of an Illusion, Sigmund Freud utilizes his method of psychoanalysis on religion by comparing the relationship between human and religion to that of a child and his parents. Freud effectively demonstrates that religion is a product of the human mind. After exposing religion as a an illusion, Freud concludes that humanity will be better off when it has forgone religion. This paper will argue that Freud's assertion that religion is an illusion is correct because of it's blatantly traceable evolution through the history of the human civilization and psyche.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As seen with Kant’s argument concerning morality, man can reason many truths. However, these truths acquire a deeper meaning when considered in the broader scope of faith. As Paul II notes, faith “allows reason to attain correctly what it seeks to know and to place it within the ultimate order of things,” (Paul II 12). In the case of morality, man could reason to find the morality of an action, but it isn’t until he combines this reason with faith that he can conclude the full importance of his action on a larger scale and in relation to God and his fellow man. By doing this, man attains a unique perspective on the the implications of his actions that is not available solely through reason. Despite having a positive attitude toward reason, Kant’s assertion does not create a necessary rupture between faith and reason.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of Reckoning Anew

    • 7315 Words
    • 30 Pages

    ! Of Reckoning Anew: A Path to seeking Philosophy in Good Earnest Philosophy of Science Degree Proposal for the Unique & Interdisciplinary Studies at the City University of New York by Robert Kai Erlenbusch Abstract The general literature regarding the evaluation and utility of the Philosophy of Science emphasizes the gulf between various schools within Humanities and those of the Sciences.…

    • 7315 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These are the three pillars upon which the world is delicately balanced. Conformity, Emotion, and Faith. If one of these crumbles, the others will collapse also. There are those who would rationalise and speak of the terrific consequences of fanciful imaginings, yet this terror is what forces cruelty.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Over the years, the nature of reality, knowing, thinking and believing has constituted puzzling issues which epistemology attempts to grapple with. Issues cutting across what can we know, what is the nature and scope of human knowledge, what can be known with certainty, how do we acquire knowledge, how can we know what is when we come across it, what can be left to faith or opinion to decide, as well as the proper source of knowledge preoccupied the philosophical and at the same time, the epistemological thought of philosophers. In this connection, different schools of thought have come to limelight notably among them are scepticism, rationalism, and empiricism.…

    • 4236 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    To bring about an understanding and acceptance of a new belief individuals must first be open to what might not make sense given their own, their friends, and the majorities interpretation of things. These new ideas might at first be thought of as a type of radicalism, but I have learned that the acceptance of the possibility of a new idea is the only way one changes as person, and the only way society as a whole can change. Throughout my college career I have found that sometimes a door opens and when we allow ourselves to walk through it we may find that there is an unimaginable world on the other side. On this note, Dr. Jason Wirth has been the most influential professor in my time spent here at Seattle University. He taught me that, “there are things that happen sometimes that let you soar out and feel a bigger thing.” To me that bigger thing has been the bright light of a Jesuit education. Jason told me during one of our few meetings about my papers in the fall of this school year that to find what I want to say I must…

    • 6889 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes and Augustine, in their respective examinations of the mind and God, come to the conclusion that the true understanding of all things derives from the withdrawal of the self from foreign influence and the necessity to look inward. Although each thinker’s journey or course of understanding was different, and at times rather contrasting, their ultimate realizations about knowledge are very coherent.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This purpose of this research paper is to gain and give insight on the subject of faith and its…

    • 1359 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Holding on

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The human mind holds thoughts and ideas that sometimes interfere with its acceptance of truth. Sir Francis Bacon calls these hindering ideas “idols” in his work: Idols Which Beset Men’s Minds because people tend to hold onto these flawed ideas even when faced with other possibilities. Charles S. Peirce tells us in The Fixation of Belief that people do not just hold onto a belief, they hold onto it with an unyielding stubbornness. This stubbornness hinders the mind from accepting or pursuing new truth. These human tendencies to persist in a belief, defined by Bacon and Peirce, are illustrated in Bertolt Brecht’s play, Galileo.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Epistemology robs us of our knowledge” (David Lewis). This statement is a direct result of skeptical theory in the epistemological community. For decades, philosophers have struggled with the possibility that individuals cannot know anything about the external world based on their senses. Many skeptical scenarios have been proposed, from Descartes’ “not being able to rule out the possibility that he is dreaming”, to the “Brain in the Vat” scenario, the possibility that no one can know what it is they have previously claimed to know; each haunts the steps of philosophers on their journey for understanding. It seems that for as many instances of skeptical scenarios that have been proposed, counter theories have also risen. The argument against skepticism presented in this paper is called contextualism and in its varying forms, hopes to provide an answer to the issue of skepticism. However, this paper is not simply a recitation of contextualist ideas. It also seeks to show the analysis of the theory given by Richard Feldman. To begin, an understanding of basic contextualist theory is required.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays