Preview

Sectionalism in the early-mid 1800s.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sectionalism in the early-mid 1800s.
A sense of unity filled the United States of America after they gained independence by winning the Revolutionary War. This sense of unity, however, did not last forever. Rather than having disputes with Britain, the United States began to have disputes among its three "sections" - the north, south, and west. Starting with the War of 1812, sectionalism began as a small rift but grew into a huge gap that separated the north, south, and west.

The end of the controversial War of 1812 did not end sectionalism. In fact, the War in general essentially served as an ignition to the division of the sections. Even further dividing the sections, the Protective Tariff of 1814 put a 25% tax on all imported goods. This means that a roll of cloth from Britain that originally sold for $5 would now cost $6.25. This greatly helped the North - British factories often sold goods cheaper than the factories in New England did in order to sell more. Due to the tariff, the North now had the best price and farmers in the west and south were forced to buy from New England factories. To help out the south, the government would spend some of their profits from the tariffs on transportation improvements in the south and west. The south and west, however, was angered by the tariff. The transportation improve-ments, they argued, did not help them significantly. Overall, they felt the north was benefiting from the tariff at their expense.

Sectionalism was such a widespread and realized problem that three sectional representatives - one for each section - emerged. Henry Clay spoke for the west. Although he was a sectional leader, Clay has been called one of the most nationalistic leaders in America 's history. Clay had always tried to improve national unity, but unfortunately, many of his ideas never went into effect. John C. Calhoun was the sectional representative for the south. He was an opinionated man, and believed the states should have more power than the federal government. Calhoun also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main factors for this swap in sectionalistic/nationalistic feelings throughout the country was the beginning of the industrial revolution. Before the Industrial Revolution, some New Englanders even talked about leaving the Union during the Hartford Convention. After the Industrial Revolution, the North’s place in the Union would be stronger then ever. The industrial revolution caused many northern cities, such as Boston, major economic growth. While previously the New England colonies’ economies were not as strong as the South, the North overtook the South in economic terms. Factories sprung up and manufacturing became a major part of the economy. Unlike the North, the South was not as greatly effected by the Industrial Revolution. They remained in their agrarian economy even as the North advanced. This caused a divide between the amount of railroads and factories between the North and South. The South began to lag behind the North in economic growth. The roles that had been set in the 1810’s had been reversed. Now the South wanted to secede from the United States.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1800's, Americans in the North and South often had conflict but could no longer resolve their political disputes through compromise by the year 1860. In this time period, compromise was not an option because slavery and states rights' caused political disputes between the north and south.The two political parties in the north and south lost their ability to cooperate and by the mid 1800's increased the issue of the division of the states.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution 1850 Dbq

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1782 Americans won their independence from Britain in the American Revolution. After the colonies won their independence, Americans created the Constitution. Its purpose was to replace the Articles of Confederation and solve its problems and more importantly to bring the states together under a single document creating a stronger union of all the states. There was one problem though: there were a few fundamental issues that the framers could not agree on. In the early nineteenth century the United States began to split, but as the mid-century came around, people became more polarized in their views and the union started to separate drastically. During the period of 1850, until 1861 when the Confederate States of America was formed, the union was clearly divided between the North and South. Although the Constitution was not the only factor leading to sectional tension in America, there are many strong points in the North and South favoring the statement, "By the 1850's the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created."…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Congress letter by John Randolph in 1816 discussed how Congress should regulate commerce and not levy taxes. The taxes favored manufacturers, and they became wealthy, while the southern farmers were extremely poor because of these duties (Doc A.). Along with extreme taxing, came great expansion west because of the population growth. This would seem like a good thing, but only to some parts of the US; particularly the North. The “National Road” was the first improved road to be funded by the federal government. Therefore, the north received roads, canals, and federal aid. The East received protective tariffs, and the South received close to nothing. Slavery was still prominent in the south, and no government aid was provided. In a letter from Anna Hayes Johnson in Charleston, South Carolina, to her cousin in Raleigh, North Carolina, she discusses the slavery dispute in the North and South. Slavery was temporarily dealt with by the Missouri Compromise in 1820; but it was not until later that a permanent abolishment was made (Doc G.). Another instance of Sectionalism was the Panic of 1819. What caused this was the deflation in crop prices; especially cotton as Britain demanded drops and cheaper resources. Also, over speculation of the land made the western farmers unable to pay loans from the US banks. The Bank of the US had suddenly tightened their credits; which incorporated tougher loan requirements, and requirements for specie from state banks. Lastly, politically, sectionalism was very obvious. In maps of popular votes and electoral votes from 1820 and 1824, it was clear that by 1824, different states had begun to vote for different presidents (Doc I.). Eventually, the US was divided into different political parties; and thus, political emerged and changed the US forever. In summary, sectionalism had emerged and what seemed…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The increase in sectionalism and the tensions that arose from it was surprising to me because I naively assumed the United States was for the most completely united at this point in Antebellum America. The political polarization and its dramatic impact on the political landscape of the 1850s was very interesting to learn about. The creation of two political parties, Democrats and Whigs, really cemented the notion of the divide between North and South. The rise of such parties as the Free-Soil Party and the Know-Nothings, or the American Party, is very reminiscent of today’s political climate. While the undertones of the slavery debate create divides even within political parties, the concerns of the nativist movement shifting towards the immigration…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even in the early infancy of America, it is evident that it’s people desired to expand and grow their tiny nation. The New World held so many opportunities for the foreign people with its abundance of land. Though the prosperity of expansion was a major factor, moving into the unexplored land was a cause for most of the countries battles. But, the people’s craving for land was insatiable once they started to branch out. Land was power, and the more you had the better off you’d be in terms of foreign affairs and in the wellbeing of your nation economically.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The North had an industrial economy based on manufacturing. They supported tariffs because they wanted american goods to be sold at lower prices than British goods could. The South was an agrarian economy based on agriculture, meaning that they supplied themselves by growing their own food. The South opposed the tariffs because it would destroy their economy because it would increase the cost of imported goods. The West was an emerging economy and supported the internal improvements and the sale of public lands. When Jackson’s vice president John C. Calhoun supported the criteria needed for a strong central government but didn’t support the tariffs of abominations. In response to the tariffs of abomination, he created the South Carolina Expositions and Protest. Then protest advanced to the states’ rights doctrine. He argued that, because the states had formed the national government, state power should be greater than federal power. He believed states had the right to nullify, or reject, any federal law they judged to be unconstitutional”(Deverell, William and Deborah Gray White). This would help in the future because it would allow states to be more…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the American government started passing unfavorable bills regarding certain territories in America, hostilities increased significantly, destroying the only aspiration of avoiding a civil war. Due to plentiful resources and population growth, the North transformed into a metropolitan area with advanced technology and successful ventures. It was also able to increase its territory due to the Ordinance of 1784, which allowed it to “incorporate new north-western states into its region,” and “achieve a larger population of residents.” The North’s increase in territory caused the South to envy its prosperity, increasing tensions that would contribute to the Civil War. Similar to how the Ordinance of 1784 escalated tensions in the South, the Wilmot Proviso, intended to eradicate slavery, drew an uproar from both the North and the South. Henry Clay, a politician opposing slavery, defied the expectations of both the North and the South by instructing the North to refrain from “demanding the terms” of the Wilmot Proviso and the South “against considering secession.” Since the South possessed a worse economy than the North, Clay had asserted that by eradicating slavery in the South, it would wage war just to preserve its economy. Clay’s warning revealed that the government advocated the North as opposed to the South, and that it was incapable of passing sufficient legislation. The South discovered the government’s bias towards the North and started the process to secede from the Union in order to achieve autonomy and create an honest…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War of 1812 was very divisive to America. Sections were staunchly for it or against it. Generally, the West and South were for the war, the Northeast was hotly against it.…

    • 3587 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Era of Good Feelings

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the War of 1812, Historians believe that the United States of America entered a period of time free of major crisis and filled with prosperity, commonly referred to as “the Era of Good feelings”. While this time period did have a rising influence in nationalism, which brought the nation together, it also brought the rise of sectionalism, which emerged as a problem that would further and further divide the country until the outbreak of the Civil war in 1861. This and the economic problems in the country, like the panic of 1819, caused the traditionally referred to peaceful era to actually be a time of financial troubles and political unrest, which would set the stage for the Civil War.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism In The 1800s

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In American History, we are currently studying the concept of sectionalism. Sectionalism is division within a country based on regional beliefs and interests. In the early to mid 1800’s, sectionalism in America grew as slavery divided the nation. Slavery was ignored, compromised and argued about by the states until the conflict drove our country until the Civil War. Although regional differences are not as distinct these days, many issues are currently causing division among the states and people of our country. These issues lead to what our history class describes as “modern sectionalism.” One such issue is Gay Marriage.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early 1800’s the paths of the north and the south began to grow in opposite directions, making simple compromises became harder and more difficult to deal with as the north continued to produce a large amount of abolitionists and the south never strayed from slavery. The south felt like the north was taking advantage of them in various ways. As the north and the south began to go their own ways they began to differentiate there became apparent disagreements in every aspect of a civilization. Politically, the south felt cornered. They felt that there was only one option that could free the south from the biased compromises and rulings of the north, which was to secede from the union. Their social differences mainly was based on the issue of slavery while economically the north was very industrialized while the south continued to produce crops on plantations.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Essay

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Civil War was the most divisive war in American history. In the early 1800s, the United States experienced a growth of nationalism and unity, but it was replaced by sectionalism, leading to the Civil War. There were many reasons why the South wanted to secede, reasons the North wanted to maintain the Union, and the controversy surrounding slavery and steps taken to abolish it.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays